Why Would Trump Hold Onto Anything From His Presidency That Would Give ANYONE Grounds to Invade His Private Space With a Search Warrant?

Do you really believe a guy accused of being a criminal mastermind by dems is that stupid?

1661593904935.png


NO ONE ever called Trump a "mastermind" except himself, but YES, he is THAT stupid.
But a "genius" compared to his cult.
 
Because he is stupid.
Because he had no massive amounts of safety nets as establishment politicians ranging from RINOS to Socialist/Communists in levels of covering for. Biden is special needs. All he needs to do is deny. And the media will make sure he is totally insulated from his real self.
 
Because he had no massive amounts of safety nets as establishment politicians ranging from RINOS to Socialist/Communists in levels of covering for. Biden is special needs. All he needs to do is deny. And the media will make sure he is totally insulated from his real self.

Trump was determined to break the law and take the documents. What safety net did you expect?
 
Last edited:
Because he had no massive amounts of safety nets as establishment politicians ranging from RINOS to Socialist/Communists in levels of covering for. Biden is special needs. All he needs to do is deny. And the media will make sure he is totally insulated from his real self.
Nope. He's just stupid. He always has been, but his daddy's money got him out of the stupid shit he did before.
 
Nope. He's just stupid. He always has been, but his daddy's money got him out of the stupid shit he did before.
You as a Prog concentrate on his personality. That is modern politics. I concentrated on the survival of a sovereign nation. The personal crap means little to Trump as he promoted less interference in an individual's life as compared to Progs. The governor of Michigan if lost in the hinterlands will never make it back to the hustle, bustle of modern lovable and rich Detroit.
 
Maybe I'm just being naive but why give people LEGAL grounds to come after you?

That's like leaving a job, especially if involuntarily and deciding to keep one of the cell phones that you've been using for both work and personal calls and then refusing or not wanting to turn it over when asked for it. I understand that having your own personal items mixed in with your work items presents a dilemma but you don't deal with it by lying about what you're holding and then not turning over everything that is asked for.

Unless I'm missing something, does Trump or anyone else believe he's entitled to keep classified, top secret documents at his home? Why would he not turn these items over? Just general principle?

Former President Trump is asking a federal court to appoint a special master to review the documents the FBI seized from Mar-a-Lago this month during a court-authorized search.​
In a motion filed in federal court in Florida, Trump also is seeking to prevent the government from further reviewing the documents that were taken until a special master is appointed, and he wants the government to provide more details on items that were taken during the search.​
The legal action is the first from Trump's attorneys since FBI agents executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago two weeks ago.​
"Law enforcement is a shield that protects Americans. It cannot be used as a weapon for political purposes," the filing says. "Therefore, we seek judicial assistance in the aftermath of an unprecedented and unnecessary raid on President Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago."​
Trump's attorneys argue that the search raises Fourth Amendment concerns and that the warrant used was overly broad. They also say the department took the unprecedented step of searching the former president's home despite what Trump's attorneys say was his voluntary assistance with investigators over several months.​
In a statement, Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley reiterated that the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago was "authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause."​
The department is aware of Trump's motion, he said, and will file its response in court.​
Last Friday, the judge in the case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, gave the Justice Department one week to provide a redacted copy of the affidavit used to justify the unprecedented search of Trump's residence. Multiple media organizations had asked the judge to unseal all documents related to the search, notably the affidavit laying out the reasoning and research. At a hearing last Thursday, the organizations said they do not want to release any information that would have a chilling effect on current or future witnesses, endanger people involved in the probe or compromise the investigation.​
Read the full warrant documents from FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago home's Mar-a-Lago home

The Justice Department argued at the hearing that redacting the affidavit would leave no information of substance to release and also noted that the search itself and release of the warrant last week had created a volatile situation where FBI agents have already received death threats.​
The Justice Department must give Reinhart their proposed redacted version by Thursday at noon. The judge has not said what, if anything, he will ultimately order made public.​


While the Justice Department asked the court to unseal the warrant, citing intense public interest, it has argued strongly against releasing the affidavit, saying doing so could compromise its investigation, other probes, the possibility of future witness cooperation and the safety of agents and individuals named in the affidavit.​
The warrant shows that FBI agents retrieved documents labeled classified, secret, top secret and confidential as well potential presidential records. It also reveals that the Justice Department is investigating the potential violation of three federal statutes, including the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.​
The genesis of the investigation comes from an unlikely source: the National Archives. This winter the agency, in charge of cataloguing and storing important government documents, retrieved 15 boxes of key presidential records that it said Trump was improperly and possibly illegally keeping at home.​
As insulated and isolated as MAGA world is, it's a reflection of his world.

Trump and his enablers (the real culprits of the last six years) clearly talked themselves and each other into believing that he could do whatever he wanted. In virtually any situation. And no critical input from the outside would change their minds, as usual.

He could easily get away with this and all of the other things he's done. If that happens, that's when Steve Bannon gets what he wants and the country finally breaks.
 
As insulated and isolated as MAGA world is, it's a reflection of his world.

Trump and his enablers (the real culprits of the last six years) clearly talked themselves and each other into believing that he could do whatever he wanted. In virtually any situation. And no critical input from the outside would change their minds, as usual.

He could easily get away with this and all of the other things he's done. If that happens, that's when Steve Bannon gets what he wants and the country finally breaks.

Bootlicker
 
Another personal attack. Boring.

rASlwev.jpg

You continue to get everything wrong while you're smugly convinced you are oh so right.

It's not about Trump, moron.

It's about the fact that we don't essentially HAVE elected officials anymore. The entrenched bureaucracy will decide who we can elect.

You're okay with that, because you're a bootlicker.
 
You continue to get everything wrong while you're smugly convinced you are oh so right.

It's not about Trump, moron.

It's about the fact that we don't essentially HAVE elected officials anymore. The entrenched bureaucracy will decide who we can elect.

You're okay with that, because you're a bootlicker.
Another personal attack. Boring.

Sorry, NewsVine_Mariyam, for the derail. She does this a lot.
 
It doesn't matter... the dems and the swamp was always going to go after Trump no matter what he did or doesn't do... they are relentless in pursuit of him...
If he just slithers away and stop being a politician then his life will get better and tell him to start cutting the checks again…

( Now watch you think I am one of those that want to investigate him )
 
We know you're okay with unelected bureaucrats choosing our presidents and congresscritters Mac. Some people are just mesmerized by unchecked power.
If True Trump wouldn’t have won in 2016…

Now let me be clear why Trump lost was because of States changing their voting laws to allow more Mail in Ballots, and yet Republican States that Trump lost ( Georgia ) didn’t find any real fraud that would have overturned the election.

Now if Trump win in 2024 will you still hold to your guns and claim you can’t trust the voting process or will you proclaim God has blessed us and the World is right again?

As for Trump and the documents the truth is he should have returned them all but because of his ego and the need to play his games ( as usual ) he didn’t do what is logical!

As for Mac, leave him alone and understand not everyone will agree with you!
 
If True Trump wouldn’t have won in 2016…

Now let me be clear why Trump lost was because of States changing their voting laws to allow more Mail in Ballots, and yet Republican States that Trump lost ( Georgia ) didn’t find any real fraud that would have overturned the election.

Now if Trump win in 2024 will you still hold to your guns and claim you can’t trust the voting process or will you proclaim God has blessed us and the World is right again?

As for Trump and the documents the truth is he should have returned them all but because of his ego and the need to play his games ( as usual ) he didn’t do what is logical!

As for Mac, leave him alone and understand not everyone will agree with you!

I will leave Mac alone when he stops lying about "Trumpsters".

The rest is bald nonsense
 

Forum List

Back
Top