- Thread starter
- #61
Note to OP -
1. If you're not gay, you really can't say what their sex is like FOR THEM.
And I don't want to know. Regardless, it's irrelevant to my post
2. No one "subsidizes" stay-at-home mothers and, if they can afford it, there's no other reason why a gay parent cannot stay home with their child.
You don't get that tax breaks for things that other people pay are a subsidy? Tax breaks across the board are not, but the here's a break for fucking someone of the same sex is, someone else has to pay it. LOL. I'm sure you don't, you don't get much. Someone else has to make that up, Skippy. Government sure as hell doesn't spend less when they get less.
Gays make up less than 5% of our population. An even smaller percentage of those will get married. You really think this will amount to much money?
According to the CDC, about 2.2%. But that's a deflection. It's also pure hypocrisy over your hyperventilating over every dollar that goes to things you oppose because we can't afford it
The hateful RWs really need to stop their meddling and MYOB.
Since you are afraid to tell them yourself, I'll let them know for you.
So apparently from the third quote above, you are agreeing society gets no benefit from gay marriage, so we should stop funding it