- Thread starter
- #3,861
All of the ways in which 'other taxpayers' are being forced to 'subsidize' gay marriage are, by definition, the same ways in which gays are obliged to subsidize hetero marriages.
Right. Because it aids in the effort required to raise children. Hetero couples can procreate, homo couples can't.
When you can show me the heterosexual couple that was denied a marriage license for their inability or unwillingness to procreate, you might have a point. You can't and so you don't.
100% of gay couples can't procreate. There is no point to funding it. You should have gay sex on your own dime
Are you sure about that? My children were born of a 100% gay union.
And no, as long as you straight folks are giving yourselves cash and prizes for being married, we get 'em too. Hope it annoys the fuck out of you.
Yes, I'm sure. If you and your partner were the biological parents, you'd be written up in medical journals. You have a link for that?