PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
I figured with all the talk about how crazy O'Donnell was that she had to have a wacky site. I was surprised to find out she is not promoting crazy as some would like you to believe.
I then thought well that must mean that Coons has to be a straight shooter and have everything laid out. When I went to his site it was very vague and had a lot of political talk with no real solution.
I liked Coons education policy much better than O'Donnell. Quit frankly quality private education is not is not affordable by most. I think our public education system is much better than any other country. No other country allows everyone an education to the 12th grade at no cost.
At the same time Coons job creation policy is ludicrous. Extending unemployment and training people to do non existing jobs is not going to help much. I agree we need to find a way to keep jobs here in the United States but I do not want to pay $400 later for something that I can currently get for $100 to do so.
If you look at both candidates' website you will find that they are both very vague in the policies and neither are offering any real solution. You will also find that neither are crazy or out to impose their values on America.
If you notice all of the attacks against O'Donnell are gear towards her life and more personal aspects. They don't want to run on the issues because they will lose if they do that. Coons is an Obama rubber-stamp and that doesn't fly...so everyone is going after his competition on silly bullshit.
That is what I have been trying to point out. Instead of running on policy they are running on reputation. Now I read both websites and neither are offering any answers just a bunch of empty political speak with no explanation on how their plans will work.
If the rule of political science is true, "message trumps resume," then the stories about O'Donnell's past are just static.
This is appears to be the year of conservative ascendancy, the enduring gift of Barak Hussein Obama (peace be on him).