Why is Fox so obsessed with porn and sex?

[Delta4Embassy]

Media observers have not missed the preponderance of titillating and sexually suggestive content that permeates so much of the Fox News broadcast day. The on-air personalities who are young, blonde women far outnumber their ratio of the population at large. Ironically Fox has a program called “Outnumbered” that features four young female co-hosts. And no cable “news” network has done more segments than Fox on Hooters and spring break and hot teachers who seduce the boys in their classrooms.



Fox’s women exclusively wear short skirts and it has been reported that they have been ordered by management to do so. Gabriel Sherman wrote in his biography of Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, “The Loudest Voice In The Room,” that Ailes has repeatedly given direction to his staff regarding the display of female body parts. Furthermore, NPR’s media reporter David Folkenflik was told by knowledgeable sources about the Fox News “Leg Cam” that “goes directly for the legs.” And when host Megyn Kelly was interviewed by GQ (with an accompanying, and revealing, pictorial), she was asked about her own “glass table that shows off your legs.” She responded that “Well, It’s a visual business. People want to see the anchor.” That must be why Sean Hannity struts across the stage in those fuck-me pumps.


A new study published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior sheds some light on why Fox features so much skin. The study found that “American states that identify as more religious and conservative are also more apt to search for sex online.” The researchers concluded that in parts of the country where sexuality is suppressed by religious tradition, there is a pent up demand for that forbidden fruit.


While the study is an interesting window into the lascivious psyche of conservative America, it also helps to explain the decisions by Fox News programmers. As a network devoted to a staunchly right-wing, Christian audience, much of their viewership comes from the states that this study identifies as porn fiends. Consequently, Fox is catering to the demands of their audience. No doubt Fox’s marketing executives figured out a long time ago what this study is affirming more scientifically.


Additionally, at 69 years, Fox’s viewers er … voyeurs skew much older than their competitors. So what we have here is an audience of bible-thumping, Tea Partying, leches who are cooped up in rural communities that look askance at prurient interests. Thus, Fox becomes their source of gratification for both erotic and political arousal. And make no mistake, the obsessive nature of Fox’s concentration on tabloid thrill-fiction like Benghazi and Obama’s birth certificate is the news equivalent of porn. It is presented with a lustful glee and repeated ad nauseam.


The jackpot for Fox, and their audience, comes when Fox can manage to combine porn and politics. An example of that occurred this morning in a segment on Fox & Friends that reported on a man who was acquitted for taking “upskirt” photographs. This gave the program an excuse to show sexy pictures and talk about the decadence of liberalism. One guest even provided justification for the lascivious proclivities of Fox’s viewers by blaming the victims in the case, saying that “These women made a conscious choice [...] to wear certain clothes that day, and some of their body parts were the public domain.” That is, in effect, a legal argument for Peeping Toms.

More at the link, including links to the study and more.

Not surprising that the rabid RW Peeping Toms (you know you are) here are so weird about the subject.

Never so obvious as on 9/12/2001 when the normally scantily clad females dressed ultra conservatively. Was so different than their usual attire it stands out in my recollection.

 

[RKMBrown]

Media observers have not missed the preponderance of titillating and sexually suggestive content that permeates so much of the Fox News broadcast day. The on-air personalities who are young, blonde women far outnumber their ratio of the population at large. Ironically Fox has a program called “Outnumbered” that features four young female co-hosts. And no cable “news” network has done more segments than Fox on Hooters and spring break and hot teachers who seduce the boys in their classrooms.



Fox’s women exclusively wear short skirts and it has been reported that they have been ordered by management to do so. Gabriel Sherman wrote in his biography of Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, “The Loudest Voice In The Room,” that Ailes has repeatedly given direction to his staff regarding the display of female body parts. Furthermore, NPR’s media reporter David Folkenflik was told by knowledgeable sources about the Fox News “Leg Cam” that “goes directly for the legs.” And when host Megyn Kelly was interviewed by GQ (with an accompanying, and revealing, pictorial), she was asked about her own “glass table that shows off your legs.” She responded that “Well, It’s a visual business. People want to see the anchor.” That must be why Sean Hannity struts across the stage in those fuck-me pumps.


A new study published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior sheds some light on why Fox features so much skin. The study found that “American states that identify as more religious and conservative are also more apt to search for sex online.” The researchers concluded that in parts of the country where sexuality is suppressed by religious tradition, there is a pent up demand for that forbidden fruit.


While the study is an interesting window into the lascivious psyche of conservative America, it also helps to explain the decisions by Fox News programmers. As a network devoted to a staunchly right-wing, Christian audience, much of their viewership comes from the states that this study identifies as porn fiends. Consequently, Fox is catering to the demands of their audience. No doubt Fox’s marketing executives figured out a long time ago what this study is affirming more scientifically.


Additionally, at 69 years, Fox’s viewers er … voyeurs skew much older than their competitors. So what we have here is an audience of bible-thumping, Tea Partying, leches who are cooped up in rural communities that look askance at prurient interests. Thus, Fox becomes their source of gratification for both erotic and political arousal. And make no mistake, the obsessive nature of Fox’s concentration on tabloid thrill-fiction like Benghazi and Obama’s birth certificate is the news equivalent of porn. It is presented with a lustful glee and repeated ad nauseam.


The jackpot for Fox, and their audience, comes when Fox can manage to combine porn and politics. An example of that occurred this morning in a segment on Fox & Friends that reported on a man who was acquitted for taking “upskirt” photographs. This gave the program an excuse to show sexy pictures and talk about the decadence of liberalism. One guest even provided justification for the lascivious proclivities of Fox’s viewers by blaming the victims in the case, saying that “These women made a conscious choice [...] to wear certain clothes that day, and some of their body parts were the public domain.” That is, in effect, a legal argument for Peeping Toms.

More at the link, including links to the study and more.

Not surprising that the rabid RW Peeping Toms (you know you are) here are so weird about the subject.

Never so obvious as on 9/12/2001 when the normally scantily clad females dressed ultra conservatively. Was so different than their usual attire it stands out in my recollection.

Don't know about where you liberals go, but hot women are common around all the conservative oriented locales that I make a habit of going to. Maybe the problem is hot women just don't like democrats?

 

[HenryBHough]

FOX has ventured into these areas in hope of attracting liberal viewers.

 

[percysunshine]

.

'Why is Fox so obsessed with porn and sex?'

I guess they could have called it the 'Skank Network', but marketing would probably have objected.

.

 

[whitehall]

The question is why the new metrosexual left is offended by normal intelligent women? What's wrong with short haired Rach Maddow's version of the news? Maybe nobody wants to talk about homosexual rights for more than a minute. Why does the radical left focus on a former Alaskan governor's family life and disregard Hillary Clinton's psychological instability of supporting her husband's perversions in exchange for political power?

 

[elektra]

Why an obsession with porn and sex, because fox news is fair and balanced to attract liberals and democrats.

 

[Jackson]

I would say the women are nicely dressed and you call it porn. Hmmm. Is it me or is it you?

 

[RKMBrown]

I would say the women are nicely dressed and you call it porn. Hmmm. Is it me or is it you?

When your women all look like Hillary, any female that looks like a woman will look like porn to you.

 

[Dragonlady]

Perhaps because Fox viewers don't believe women's opinions matter at all so they better be hot looking so they're of some use.

 

[elektra]

Perhaps because Fox viewers don't believe women's opinions matter at all so they better be hot looking so they're of some use.

Democrats stereotype women, pretty woman can not be smart.

Democrats are bigots, beautiful conservative woman must be dumb.

Democrats are literally at war with women, democrats demonize the men women marry, democrats demonize the religion they follow, democrats will and are sending women to die and fight in wars.

Democrats seriously hate woman, so much so they must marry other men, same sex "marriage".

 

[bodecea]

Same reason they talk more about gay sex than gay people do.

 

[bodecea]

Media observers have not missed the preponderance of titillating and sexually suggestive content that permeates so much of the Fox News broadcast day. The on-air personalities who are young, blonde women far outnumber their ratio of the population at large. Ironically Fox has a program called “Outnumbered” that features four young female co-hosts. And no cable “news” network has done more segments than Fox on Hooters and spring break and hot teachers who seduce the boys in their classrooms.



Fox’s women exclusively wear short skirts and it has been reported that they have been ordered by management to do so. Gabriel Sherman wrote in his biography of Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, “The Loudest Voice In The Room,” that Ailes has repeatedly given direction to his staff regarding the display of female body parts. Furthermore, NPR’s media reporter David Folkenflik was told by knowledgeable sources about the Fox News “Leg Cam” that “goes directly for the legs.” And when host Megyn Kelly was interviewed by GQ (with an accompanying, and revealing, pictorial), she was asked about her own “glass table that shows off your legs.” She responded that “Well, It’s a visual business. People want to see the anchor.” That must be why Sean Hannity struts across the stage in those fuck-me pumps.


A new study published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior sheds some light on why Fox features so much skin. The study found that “American states that identify as more religious and conservative are also more apt to search for sex online.” The researchers concluded that in parts of the country where sexuality is suppressed by religious tradition, there is a pent up demand for that forbidden fruit.


While the study is an interesting window into the lascivious psyche of conservative America, it also helps to explain the decisions by Fox News programmers. As a network devoted to a staunchly right-wing, Christian audience, much of their viewership comes from the states that this study identifies as porn fiends. Consequently, Fox is catering to the demands of their audience. No doubt Fox’s marketing executives figured out a long time ago what this study is affirming more scientifically.


Additionally, at 69 years, Fox’s viewers er … voyeurs skew much older than their competitors. So what we have here is an audience of bible-thumping, Tea Partying, leches who are cooped up in rural communities that look askance at prurient interests. Thus, Fox becomes their source of gratification for both erotic and political arousal. And make no mistake, the obsessive nature of Fox’s concentration on tabloid thrill-fiction like Benghazi and Obama’s birth certificate is the news equivalent of porn. It is presented with a lustful glee and repeated ad nauseam.


The jackpot for Fox, and their audience, comes when Fox can manage to combine porn and politics. An example of that occurred this morning in a segment on Fox & Friends that reported on a man who was acquitted for taking “upskirt” photographs. This gave the program an excuse to show sexy pictures and talk about the decadence of liberalism. One guest even provided justification for the lascivious proclivities of Fox’s viewers by blaming the victims in the case, saying that “These women made a conscious choice [...] to wear certain clothes that day, and some of their body parts were the public domain.” That is, in effect, a legal argument for Peeping Toms.

More at the link, including links to the study and more.

Not surprising that the rabid RW Peeping Toms (you know you are) here are so weird about the subject.

It is kind of odd that the younger, blonder, and "sexier" the women are on FOX, the older, the uglier, and the balder the men.

 

[Dragonlady]

Perhaps because Fox viewers don't believe women's opinions matter at all so they better be hot looking so they're of some use.

Democrats stereotype women, pretty woman can not be smart.

They would still be ahead of conservatives who think all women are dumb. Conservatives even opposed the equal rights amendment. They oppose anything that puts women on an equal footing with men.

[Democrats are bigots, beautiful conservative woman must be dumb.

Liberals have a hard time understanding how any smart woman would vote for the party that doesn't want her to have equal rights to her husband. The plain fact is that very few women vote conservative. Those who do tend to be older white women, who are married.

Democrats are literally at war with women, democrats demonize the men women marry, democrats demonize the religion they follow, democrats will and are sending women to die and fight in wars.

Democrats are not the ones depriving women of their rights, opposing pay equity, reproductive choice, or birth control for women. They don't demonize anyone, women or men, because of who they choose to marry. Democrats didn't oppose the ERA, or any other legislation which protects women. And women aren't being "sent". They choose enlistment, knowing they may be put in harm's way. It wasn't a democrat who said that if a woman was truly raped, she couldn't get pregnant, it was a conservative.

Democrats seriously hate woman, so much so they must marry other men, same sex "marriage".

Men don't marry other men because they hate women. They marry men because that's who they are attracted to. Most of the gay men I know love and respect women, more than many straight men I know.

Your notions of men and women, conservatives and liberals defy logic, history, and popular culture.

 

[Mojo2]

The fish rots from the head, so I blame Rupert

Who do we blame for the likes of you?

 

[Mojo2]

Perhaps because Fox viewers don't believe women's opinions matter at all so they better be hot looking so they're of some use.

Only a stupid woman poster would say that.

 

[Mojo2]

Why an obsession with porn and sex, because fox news is fair and balanced to attract liberals and democrats.

That was my thought as I opened the thread.

Still is.

 

[elektra]

Perhaps because Fox viewers don't believe women's opinions matter at all so they better be hot looking so they're of some use.

Democrats stereotype women, pretty woman can not be smart.

They would still be ahead of conservatives who think all women are dumb. Conservatives even opposed the equal rights amendment. They oppose anything that puts women on an equal footing with men.

[Democrats are bigots, beautiful conservative woman must be dumb.

Liberals have a hard time understanding how any smart woman would vote for the party that doesn't want her to have equal rights to her husband. The plain fact is that very few women vote conservative. Those who do tend to be older white women, who are married.

Democrats are literally at war with women, democrats demonize the men women marry, democrats demonize the religion they follow, democrats will and are sending women to die and fight in wars.

Democrats are not the ones depriving women of their rights, opposing pay equity, reproductive choice, or birth control for women. They don't demonize anyone, women or men, because of who they choose to marry. Democrats didn't oppose the ERA, or any other legislation which protects women. And women aren't being "sent". They choose enlistment, knowing they may be put in harm's way. It wasn't a democrat who said that if a woman was truly raped, she couldn't get pregnant, it was a conservative.

Democrats seriously hate woman, so much so they must marry other men, same sex "marriage".

Men don't marry other men because they hate women. They marry men because that's who they are attracted to. Most of the gay men I know love and respect women, more than many straight men I know.

Your notions of men and women, conservatives and liberals defy logic, history, and popular culture.

Democrats lie about conservative women, democrats lie about conservative men, democrats lie about history, democrats will even deny orphaned girls a chance to be adopted by a man and a woman, i.e. homosexual "parents.

Democrats hate women

 

[Political Junky]

Fox's audience of seniors likes the flash of a leg and big hair.

 

[barryqwalsh]

Do you have Page 3 Girls in the US?


Page 3 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[jwoodie]

Media observers have not missed the preponderance of titillating and sexually suggestive content that permeates so much of the Fox News broadcast day. The on-air personalities who are young, blonde women far outnumber their ratio of the population at large. Ironically Fox has a program called “Outnumbered” that features four young female co-hosts. And no cable “news” network has done more segments than Fox on Hooters and spring break and hot teachers who seduce the boys in their classrooms.



Fox’s women exclusively wear short skirts and it has been reported that they have been ordered by management to do so. Gabriel Sherman wrote in his biography of Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, “The Loudest Voice In The Room,” that Ailes has repeatedly given direction to his staff regarding the display of female body parts. Furthermore, NPR’s media reporter David Folkenflik was told by knowledgeable sources about the Fox News “Leg Cam” that “goes directly for the legs.” And when host Megyn Kelly was interviewed by GQ (with an accompanying, and revealing, pictorial), she was asked about her own “glass table that shows off your legs.” She responded that “Well, It’s a visual business. People want to see the anchor.” That must be why Sean Hannity struts across the stage in those fuck-me pumps.


A new study published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior sheds some light on why Fox features so much skin. The study found that “American states that identify as more religious and conservative are also more apt to search for sex online.” The researchers concluded that in parts of the country where sexuality is suppressed by religious tradition, there is a pent up demand for that forbidden fruit.


While the study is an interesting window into the lascivious psyche of conservative America, it also helps to explain the decisions by Fox News programmers. As a network devoted to a staunchly right-wing, Christian audience, much of their viewership comes from the states that this study identifies as porn fiends. Consequently, Fox is catering to the demands of their audience. No doubt Fox’s marketing executives figured out a long time ago what this study is affirming more scientifically.


Additionally, at 69 years, Fox’s viewers er … voyeurs skew much older than their competitors. So what we have here is an audience of bible-thumping, Tea Partying, leches who are cooped up in rural communities that look askance at prurient interests. Thus, Fox becomes their source of gratification for both erotic and political arousal. And make no mistake, the obsessive nature of Fox’s concentration on tabloid thrill-fiction like Benghazi and Obama’s birth certificate is the news equivalent of porn. It is presented with a lustful glee and repeated ad nauseam.


The jackpot for Fox, and their audience, comes when Fox can manage to combine porn and politics. An example of that occurred this morning in a segment on Fox & Friends that reported on a man who was acquitted for taking “upskirt” photographs. This gave the program an excuse to show sexy pictures and talk about the decadence of liberalism. One guest even provided justification for the lascivious proclivities of Fox’s viewers by blaming the victims in the case, saying that “These women made a conscious choice [...] to wear certain clothes that day, and some of their body parts were the public domain.” That is, in effect, a legal argument for Peeping Toms.

More at the link, including links to the study and more.

Not surprising that the rabid RW Peeping Toms (you know you are) here are so weird about the subject.

Why are You so obsessed with Fox?