Unification
Member
- Aug 5, 2018
- 225
- 7
- 16
- Thread starter
- #101
Your "poly" rules are not recognized under common law.Is not cheating, silly willy - it is polyamory which is what I identify as. Wife should not care if I love other women unless she is ignorant bigot against my sexuality.I'd argue that the irreligious have proven themselves too devolved and degenerate to properly govern themselves without the guidance of, contrary to their deluded notions of "independence". Being given over less-evolved vices such as gluttony, sexual deviancy, porn addiction, and what not - the types of simplistic pleasures befitting of lesser evolved species they have more in common with than enlightened humans who are capable of creating and appreciating higher things such as arts, music, sciences, and spirituality - all which, of course are religious constructs and institutions.
Therefore it would be in the best interest of America and Europe's governments to administer religion to them and re-establish state religion in our schools, universities and media. America's "first Amendment" is something of an outdated holdover of a past area and can easily be amended or subverted; while America's founders were wise in many areas, they were foolish in others, such as in their decision to permit enslavement of Africans - I'd argue that their decision to grant freedom of religion, rather than establishing state religion was one of their foolies, and something which secularists have of course proven themselves incapable of handling responsibly.
As for how to implement this - the details vary. I'd argue that even giving secularists or atheists "human rights" at all is a luxury, but wouldn't see the need or effectiveness in actively arresting and imprisoning them for holding secular beliefs in the privacy of their own how. But ideally, publicly identifying as a "secularist" or "atheist" should be made socially acceptable in any civilized nation on par with publicly identifying as a pedophile, rapist, or Nazi, or otherwise, and this way they could passively be encouraged either to convert to religion or keep their deviant beliefs outside of civilized society.
Hard for me to tell whether you are just trolling- or you really are the Fascist you make yourself out to be.....
But ideally, publicly identifying as a "secularist" or "atheist" should be made socially acceptable in any civilized nation on par with publicly identifying as a pedophile, rapist, or Nazi, or otherwise, and this way they could passively be encouraged either to convert to religion or keep their deviant beliefs outside of civilized society.
So in your mind- anyone who doesn't believe in your fairy tales is just the same as a rapist......
Thank 'god' we have a Constitution to protect us all from Fascists like you.
This troll that posted the OP is a typical religious hypocrite. He claims wants everyone to follow HIS religion, so we can have a moral and ethical world. And then he talks about cheating on his wife.
Yes, it DOES matter. It is the fundamental key to being poly. Everyone you are involved with should know.
According to law, you are infelicitous and it doesn't matter whether or not she "agrees" or knows, since "consent" does not matter as far as state is concerned, and state has right to declare behavior wrong or immoral whether or not people "consent" to it or not.
I not polyamorous, silly rabbit - I just make a point about your absuridty.If she doesn't care after she knows, that is great. If she does care and you continue without allowing her to divorce you, it is cheating.
Can your wife go out and seduce men?
You're still doing the same physical act as cheating, so whether she "knowns" or not doesn't change it, and the state doesn't care whether or not she "consents" to it, they have leeway do declare behavior wrong even if done under consent.
If your wifey divorce you, for example, she can still use your record of infidelity against you in court whether or not she "consented" to the infidelity, since your private "agreement" isn't recognized under common law.