Why do anti-science religionists never question the theory of gravity?

[OohPooPahDoo]

Why do anti-science religionists never question the theory of gravity? Seriously, our current theory of gravity is far more God destroying than evolution or the big bang theory ever could have been! Einstein's gravity shows us that the concepts of an absolute time and space are false, that the measurement of these very basic quantities changes depending on how the observer's space-time is warped by matter - there is no preferred reference frame! Doens't that just blow God out of the water? Yet I rarely see the anti-scientist religionists attacking the theory of gravity!

why?

 

[Ariux]

Einstein's gravity shows us that the concepts of an absolute time and space are false, that the measurement of these very basic quantities changes depending on how the observer's space-time is warped by matter - there is no preferred reference frame! Doens't that just blow God out of the water?

How so, fool?

 

[Oddball]

We can quantify, falsify and repeatedly test -in context- the theory of gravity, to the point that a high school freshman can understand it, even though it cannot be explained at the molecular level....Nobody needs an exclusive group of gravity insiders to "peer review" one another and agree upon these things.

Conversely, the anthropogenic Goebbels warming hoax fails all three of these long-time accepted acid tests of "settled science".

OP: FAIL!

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Einstein's gravity shows us that the concepts of an absolute time and space are false, that the measurement of these very basic quantities changes depending on how the observer's space-time is warped by matter - there is no preferred reference frame! Doens't that just blow God out of the water?

How so, fool?

How so?

That's how. The RHS is the matter-energy stress tensor, the LHS is the Ricci tensor of the space-time geometry in which we exist (plus a cosmological constant term, the last term on the LHS, which can equally well bemoved to the RHS and considered a vaccuum energy). Matter and energy actually cause space-time to become not flat.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

We can quantify, falsify and repeatedly test -in context- the theory of gravity, to the point that a high school freshman can understand it, even though it cannot be explained at the molecular level....

Are you kidding me? High school freshman can only understand gravity in the Newtonian limit - and in that limit space and time can be considered absolutes. I'm talking about Einstein's theory of gravity - and I guarantee you that there are a very small number of people who understand the math behind it. By einstein's gravity space and time are not absolute, they are warped by matter.

Nobody needs an exclusive group of gravity insiders to "peer review" one another and agree upon these things.

The group of scientists activiely publishing in matters of gravity is not terribly big, at least not on the theoretical side.

 

[Truthmatters]

great point.

they only believe sceince when it suits them.

all sceince is subject to political needs to them.

There is nothing they wont attack to retain their historically failed ideas

 

[nitroz]

Cause god made it.
Thinkers go to hell.

 

[Oddball]

We can quantify, falsify and repeatedly test -in context- the theory of gravity, to the point that a high school freshman can understand it, even though it cannot be explained at the molecular level....

Are you kidding me? High school freshman can only understand gravity in the Newtonian limit - and in that limit space and time can be considered absolutes. I'm talking about Einstein's theory of gravity - and I guarantee you that there are a very small number of people who understand the math behind it. By einstein's gravity space and time are not absolute, they are warped by matter.

A high school frosh can understand basics like acceleration rate, theory on destinies and other rudimentary concepts.

Nobody needs an exclusive group of gravity insiders to "peer review" one another and agree upon these things.

The group of scientists activiely publishing in matters of gravity is not terribly big, at least not on the theoretical side.

So fucking what?...The verifiable and falsifiable mechanics of the phenomenon remain the same.

You're just loony because your fewer and fewer people are buying into the anthropogenic Goebbels warming tax-and-central-control scam, itself a quasi-religion, and it just burns your ass.

 

[PredFan]

great point.

they only believe sceince when it suits them.

all sceince is subject to political needs to them.

There is nothing they wont attack to retain their historically failed ideas

You words can fit liberals just as well.

You only believe the science you like.

Science is a political weapon as long as it serves your needs.

There is absolutely NOTHING you won't attack to retain your historically failed ideas.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

We can quantify, falsify and repeatedly test -in context- the theory of gravity, to the point that a high school freshman can understand it, even though it cannot be explained at the molecular level....

Are you kidding me? High school freshman can only understand gravity in the Newtonian limit - and in that limit space and time can be considered absolutes. I'm talking about Einstein's theory of gravity - and I guarantee you that there are a very small number of people who understand the math behind it. By einstein's gravity space and time are not absolute, they are warped by matter.

A high school frosh can understand basics like acceleration rate, theory on destinies and other rudimentary concepts.

Yeah, I know that. They can't understand general relativity.

Nobody needs an exclusive group of gravity insiders to "peer review" one another and agree upon these things.

The group of scientists activiely publishing in matters of gravity is not terribly big, at least not on the theoretical side.

So fucking what?...

You're the one who made an issue of the exclusivity of the group of peers, not me.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

You only believe the science you like.

I like all science.

 

[uscitizen]

Gravity is not mentioned in the bible.

 

[daveman]

Gravity is not mentioned in the bible.

Then the devil took Him to the holy city and had Him stand on the highest point of the temple.
"If You are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: "'He will command His angels concerning You, and they will lift You up in their hands, so that You will not strike Your foot against a stone.'"

Matthew 4:5-6, NIV

 

[uscitizen]

Gravity is not mentioned in the bible.

Then the devil took Him to the holy city and had Him stand on the highest point of the temple.
"If You are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: "'He will command His angels concerning You, and they will lift You up in their hands, so that You will not strike Your foot against a stone.'"

Matthew 4:5-6, NIV

that is the result of gravity. It did not mention why he would splatter if he stepped off the temple.

 

[daveman]

Gravity is not mentioned in the bible.

Then the devil took Him to the holy city and had Him stand on the highest point of the temple.
"If You are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: "'He will command His angels concerning You, and they will lift You up in their hands, so that You will not strike Your foot against a stone.'"

Matthew 4:5-6, NIV

that is the result of gravity. It did not mention why he would splatter if he stepped off the temple.

Splattering has nothing to do with gravity. It has to do with kinetic energy.

You might just want to give up now. You're in over your head.

 

[uscitizen]

Then the devil took Him to the holy city and had Him stand on the highest point of the temple.
"If You are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: "'He will command His angels concerning You, and they will lift You up in their hands, so that You will not strike Your foot against a stone.'"

Matthew 4:5-6, NIV

that is the result of gravity. It did not mention why he would splatter if he stepped off the temple.

Splattering has nothing to do with gravity. It has to do with kinetic energy.

You might just want to give up now. You're in over your head.

and what creates that kinetic energy?

Actually the splattering has to do with the impact.
And human bodies being softer than the ground.
It is a bit more complex than you indicate.

 

[rdean]

We can quantify, falsify and repeatedly test -in context- the theory of gravity, to the point that a high school freshman can understand it, even though it cannot be explained at the molecular level....Nobody needs an exclusive group of gravity insiders to "peer review" one another and agree upon these things.

Conversely, the anthropogenic Goebbels warming hoax fails all three of these long-time accepted acid tests of "settled science".

OP: FAIL!

You can't prove the Grand Canyon wasn't created by Noah's Flood.

 

[Ariux]

How so?

That's how. The RHS is the matter-energy stress tensor, the LHS is the Ricci tensor of the space-time geometry in which we exist (plus a cosmological constant term, the last term on the LHS, which can equally well bemoved to the RHS and considered a vaccuum energy). Matter and energy actually cause space-time to become not flat.

Shitbrain, posting a tensor field equation and asserting that space time isn't flat doesn't support your assertion that Relativity "blow God out of the water." On the contrary, it's a Creationist's salvation, by allowing the existence of differing frames of reference.

 

[PredFan]

You only believe the science you like.

I like all science.

Me too, but I wasn't singling you out.

 

[daveman]

that is the result of gravity. It did not mention why he would splatter if he stepped off the temple.

Splattering has nothing to do with gravity. It has to do with kinetic energy.

You might just want to give up now. You're in over your head.

and what creates that kinetic energy?

Actually the splattering has to do with the impact.
And human bodies being softer than the ground.
It is a bit more complex than you indicate.

And yet, oddly, the effects of gravity are indeed mentioned in the Bible.

If you thought you had a point with your original statement -- you didn't.