Why cant the AGW contingent make their case??

[Wyld Kard]

Why can't the AGW contingent make their case??

Because the Carbon Cult is not interested in facts, only propaganda and the constant repetition of an alleged and unquestionable "truth". Crucial to this has been the creation and control of the UN's IPCC.

The IPCC is believed to a scientific body, but that's not true. It's a corrupt political organization masquerading as scientific, and it manipulates by quoting the scientists who promote the lies and misinformation based on fraudulent science and ignores those who don't.

Whether it's called global warming or climate change, it is nothing more then a massive scam to push a political agenda to introduce more taxation, more regulations, and more government control all in the name of "saving the planet".

 

[mamooth]

The instant anyone starts some insane rambling about the VastGlobalSocialistConspiracy, normal people automatically write them off as babbling conspiracy cultists.

 

[Billy_Bob]

We give you scientists publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. You give us the spewing of an un-degreed ex-TV weatherman, and expect us to give equal weight to that. You are somewhat retarded Wildcard.

The elitist scumbag answer... The ones who think only they are so smart and others who may not have degree's but have the smarts are stupid..... Ignorance!

I know morons who hold PHD's and I know people who have not finished the 10th grade who can stomp them in the dirt in not only math but understanding and identifying processes. Your elitist drivel is just crap..

You missed the point completely Billy Boy. It's not that we are so much smarter than you (though this sort of misinterpretation on your part does lend credence to the idea) but that our experts - the world's actively researching PhD climate scientists - are so much smarter and knowledgeable and ethical than yours: Anthony Watts, Roy Spencer, Bob Tisdale, Christopher Monckton, James Taylor, John Coleman, etc, etc, etc.

BTW, what percentage of people who haven't finished the 10th grade do you believe can "stomp" PhDs "in the dirt" on technical topics? Do you really think most dropouts are smarter than most PhDs Billy? I think you do. Your posts would tend to support the idea that that's what you believe. How supportable do you think such an idea would turn out in the final contest Billy Bob? Where would such a misconception arise if not from your personal antipathy towards the educated? And where would such antipathy arise if not from your own personal failures at education? You didn't make it through school, did you. And that fact has made you a lifelong loser, hasn't it. What do you do for a living Billy Bob? Solid Waste Disposal? Roadside Excavator? Handy Man?

Got it.

We know you can not beat yourself out of a wet paper bag... We get that.. Your elitist mentality and ignorant behavior show just how stupid you really are..

 

[Crick]

I'm not so stupid as to think tenth-grade dropouts can stomp PhD's into the dirt.

 

[skookerasbil]

Who has spent what millions hiding what data?

Have you not actually woken up yet? Are you typing out your dreams?

As usual s0n.......you fAil to connect the dots correctly.

Talking with you and your pals on this is like talking to people who really believe that the reason you buy a car is related directly to the quality of the cup holders.

This back and forth about the data.......its been established that most people believe the data has been fucked with. It doesn't matter for shit that you or your pals think otherwise. Public policy makers are unimpressed.

So lets paint the picture vividly........imagine for a moment a packed car showroom and Mamooth walking around holding up a cup holder and emphatically stating, "Look at these cup holders........I must buy this car!!! You people are ignorant if you can see how these cup holders make THIS the only vehicle to buy!!".

Of course, Im not going to waste my time breaking down the logic to he climate obsessed ( these people struggle with abstracts)........the rest of the people read this and get it!!


Again I want to point out......its not an intelligence thing at all with these people. It is most definitely a thought processing issue. Big difference.....its why abstracts are hazy to these folks.


I never call these people idiots, morons etc......they don't apply. These folks are plenty smart.......far smarter than me. Their obsession with CO2 is a red flag on the thinking process........serotonin issues. Been in the field for 30 years. The dot connecting is compromised.

 

[skookerasbil]

"Most people, those without obsessional thinking problems, discard the irrelevant and useless data and process only that part of it that is pertinent to their current situation".


Sound familiar???


Obsessional Thinking


PS to the climate nutters........"useless data" is not speaking to science data!! Its speaking to data in general.





These people are unable to filter out stuff that is not relevant. Its a brain pathology. ( zero relation to intelligence )

 

[skookerasbil]

In other words.......the AGW crowd is incapable of big picture thinking. To most of the population, everything comes down to looking at the total landscape. That's why these people cannot at all see they are losing.

 

[jc456]

The instant anyone starts some insane rambling about the VastGlobalSocialistConspiracy, normal people automatically write them off as babbling conspiracy cultists.

And yet, the evidence to support your claim is still not found or presented. Cult, seems you are the cultest. Believing in something without evidence. Going along for the ride so to say. Yep, I don't believe, I don't because I asked one fundamental question which your side cannot answer. so how is it I'm a cultest? Please explain?

 

[jc456]

"Most people, those without obsessional thinking problems, discard the irrelevant and useless data and process only that part of it that is pertinent to their current situation".


Sound familiar???


Obsessional Thinking


PS to the climate nutters........"useless data" is not speaking to science data!! Its speaking to data in general.





These people are unable to filter out stuff that is not relevant. Its a brain pathology. ( zero relation to intelligence )

Skooks,

But statistics isn't about science, it is mathematics. so their entire argument is moot, it is about logistics and not science.
Oh, and when they try and discuss the science of it, they can't produce the experiment that is needed in a scientific study. None, zero as you know. so I still ask them what is their science they want to discuss, because what they do discuss has nothing to do with this discussion.

 

[skookerasbil]

"Most people, those without obsessional thinking problems, discard the irrelevant and useless data and process only that part of it that is pertinent to their current situation".


Sound familiar???


Obsessional Thinking


PS to the climate nutters........"useless data" is not speaking to science data!! Its speaking to data in general.





These people are unable to filter out stuff that is not relevant. Its a brain pathology. ( zero relation to intelligence )

Skooks,

But statistics isn't about science, it is mathematics. so their entire argument is moot, it is about logistics and not science.
Oh, and when they try and discuss the science of it, they can't produce the experiment that is needed in a scientific study. None, zero as you know. so I still ask them what is their science they want to discuss, because what they do discuss has nothing to do with this discussion.

Indeed.........and what I always come around to is pointing out that they ONLY talk about the science. As a means to an end though, nothing is working. At the present time, "Climate change" is a concept thats fun to discuss for some.......the debate going back and forth. But in the end, its nonsense really. The whole purpose of even discussing "climate change" is for the purpose of impacting peoples perceptions. Its having no impact except for making for good internet banter. Statistics. Science. Mathematics. Logistics.

Who cares?

It only matters when we look at energy production/use. For renewables.........the end game for the "science".......its a joke. Will be for decades too.


Nothing else mattters.

 

[mamooth]

But statistics isn't about science, it is mathematics. so their entire argument is moot, it is about logistics and not science.

Damn, you're stupid.

To begin understanding why that's so dumb, look up what "logistics" means. One we correct that bit of stupid, we can move on to correcting your other bits of stupid.