Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
Racist.
So wait, calling certain whites that commit crimes and making a thread about why these particular individuals within this ethnic community are not labeled is considered racist?
Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
Because they are white.
Another term you won't hear much is "Christian" terrorist.
Although there a plenty of them.
Its more that there is no cohesive political motive towards the crime. Terrorism is more a political method (violent method) than an actual crime. The actual crimes are murder, derstruction of property, hijacking/kidnapping etc. Terrorism is a motive.
Most mass shooters do not have any overriding political motives, most of them just snap and take it out on society in general.
Despite the varying agendas killing is killing...looks like its the same to me...The question is why aren't whites labeled?
When white people kill without a political or religious motive, they are still labled. We call them murderers. Either you are a dumbass who cant understand simple definitions, or you are a dumbass that wants to use one word to describe EVERYONE that kills. Either way, you are a dumbass.Because they are white.
Another term you won't hear much is "Christian" terrorist.
Although there a plenty of them.
Its more that there is no cohesive political motive towards the crime. Terrorism is more a political method (violent method) than an actual crime. The actual crimes are murder, derstruction of property, hijacking/kidnapping etc. Terrorism is a motive.
Most mass shooters do not have any overriding political motives, most of them just snap and take it out on society in general.
Despite the varying agendas killing is killing...looks like its the same to me...The question is why aren't whites labeled?
Nobody, including government leaders, ever refers to all those white Tea Party people as terrorists.
When white people kill without a political or religious motive, they are still labled. We call them murderers. Either you are a dumbass who cant understand simple definitions, or you are a dumbass that wants to use one word to describe EVERYONE that kills. Either way, you are a dumbass.Its more that there is no cohesive political motive towards the crime. Terrorism is more a political method (violent method) than an actual crime. The actual crimes are murder, derstruction of property, hijacking/kidnapping etc. Terrorism is a motive.
Most mass shooters do not have any overriding political motives, most of them just snap and take it out on society in general.
Despite the varying agendas killing is killing...looks like its the same to me...The question is why aren't whites labeled?
Why would anyone want to change a complex language thats taken well over a thousand years to develope, and make it less effective by using one word to describe many different scenarios? Thats retarded. This thread is retarded too, and so is the OP.
When white people kill without a political or religious motive, they are still labled. We call them murderers. Either you are a dumbass who cant understand simple definitions, or you are a dumbass that wants to use one word to describe EVERYONE that kills. Either way, you are a dumbass.Despite the varying agendas killing is killing...looks like its the same to me...The question is why aren't whites labeled?
Why would anyone want to change a complex language thats taken well over a thousand years to develope, and make it less effective by using one word to describe many different scenarios? Thats retarded. This thread is retarded too, and so is the OP.
Nah Godboy you're the dumbass. You're a piece of shit white person with an ignorant motive of projecting this ignorant idea of racism. Its obvious whites are not labeled on the same level as minorities because there is a racially biased media of projecting minorities as natural villains. You dumbass
When white people kill without a political or religious motive, they are still labled. We call them murderers. Either you are a dumbass who cant understand simple definitions, or you are a dumbass that wants to use one word to describe EVERYONE that kills. Either way, you are a dumbass.Despite the varying agendas killing is killing...looks like its the same to me...The question is why aren't whites labeled?
Why would anyone want to change a complex language thats taken well over a thousand years to develope, and make it less effective by using one word to describe many different scenarios? Thats retarded. This thread is retarded too, and so is the OP.
Nah Godboy you're the dumbass. You're a piece of shit white person with an ignorant motive of projecting this ignorant idea of racism. Its obvious whites are not labeled on the same level as minorities because there is a racially biased media of projecting minorities as natural villains. You dumbass
Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
why aren't black gang members who have shot and killed people in their communities not considered terrorists ?Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
Because they are white.
Another term you won't hear much is "Christian" terrorist.
Although there a plenty of them.
Sticky subject here and the truth does hurt I see and I've read excuses why they shouldn't be called terrorists....based on one part of the definition of a "terrorist" like always ignoring the other definitions:
1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3. (formerly) a member of a political group in Russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.
adjective
5. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of terrorism or terrorists: terrorist tactics.
why aren't black gang members who have shot and killed people in their communities not considered terrorists ?Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
Because they are white.
Another term you won't hear much is "Christian" terrorist.
Although there a plenty of them.
there is politics and there is street politics .why aren't black gang members who have shot and killed people in their communities not considered terrorists ?Because they are white.
Another term you won't hear much is "Christian" terrorist.
Although there a plenty of them.
because it isn't political... and they aren't "targeting civilians" for "POLITICAL" effect.
i hope that helps.
idiot.
there is politics and there is street politics .why aren't black gang members who have shot and killed people in their communities not considered terrorists ?
because it isn't political... and they aren't "targeting civilians" for "POLITICAL" effect.
i hope that helps.
idiot.
there is politics and there is street politics .because it isn't political... and they aren't "targeting civilians" for "POLITICAL" effect.
i hope that helps.
idiot.
no.
Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
Because they are white, and people don't like to think that white people could be terrorists.
Every time there is a mass shooting and the shooter is identified as a "White Person", you never hear the word "terrorists" associated with them. But yet they commit acts that are "terrorist" to say the least.
White people aren't terrorists? News flash to most people of color your are the "Original Terrorists", according to history. But when or if these very same acts are or were committed by people or persons of color, the word terrorists is used quite extensively.
Another word not used to describe a "white terrorists" is being described as an animal. Oh no, the conversation quickly and instantly turns to "mental illness" to describe the shooter. Why is that?
Because they are white.
Another term you won't hear much is "Christian" terrorist.
Although there a plenty of them.
Its more that there is no cohesive political motive towards the crime. Terrorism is more a political method (violent method) than an actual crime. The actual crimes are murder, derstruction of property, hijacking/kidnapping etc. Terrorism is a motive.
Most mass shooters do not have any overriding political motives, most of them just snap and take it out on society in general.
