CDZ Why are anti gunners so open all of a sudden about banning guns?

the millions of illegals that aren't citizens proves that wrong

Except there is no evidence that illegals vote in any significant numbers.

When they can vote, though... you guys are SOOOO done.


again...thank you......you are showing that left wing extremists will not be bound by the rule of law...that power over others is your exclusive desire, and that you will happily achieve that power through any means necessary....you will lie about laws, you will allow illegal aliens to vote, you will ignore legal Precedent.....

No more........you have helped us.....a lot. There are uninformed and naive people on our side who give you the benefit of the doubt, who think you just want "common sense" gun control......you have made it clear that you will not stop till you have banned all guns...

Thanks, it helps....
 
And there is no evidence that those millions of illegal aliens will ever become citizens

Actually, it's inevitable. They aren't going home, and eventually, they'll get a path to citizenship.

It' will take many lifetimes for it to matter

You really do worry about shit over which you have no control

But that is a typical neurosis of control freaks like you
 
No evidence of obstruction either you lose and he is your president for keeps

He fired Comey. Obstruction.

Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.


He could fire anyone just because he doesn't like the tie they are wearing....the democrats don't want to tell the truth about anything....
 
No evidence of obstruction either you lose and he is your president for keeps

He fired Comey. Obstruction.

Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.


He could fire anyone just because he doesn't like the tie they are wearing....the democrats don't want to tell the truth about anything....

In all seriousness, if obstruction was such a slam dunk case, something would almost certainly have gotten underway by now.
 
No evidence of obstruction either you lose and he is your president for keeps

He fired Comey. Obstruction.

Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.


Then why did trump say firing Comey would stop the investigation?

Does he believe that firing Mueller will stop the investigation?

Remember - its trump ...
 
No evidence of obstruction either you lose and he is your president for keeps

He fired Comey. Obstruction.

Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.


He could fire anyone just because he doesn't like the tie they are wearing....the democrats don't want to tell the truth about anything....

In all seriousness, if obstruction was such a slam dunk case, something would almost certainly have gotten underway by now.


Gosh. I see more nails in the coffin almost every day. OTOH, I don't pay much attention to the "alternative facts" sources. Google is your friend.
 
No evidence of obstruction either you lose and he is your president for keeps

He fired Comey. Obstruction.

Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.


Then why did trump say firing Comey would stop the investigation?

Does he believe that firing Mueller will stop the investigation?

Remember - its trump ...

When did Trump say that?
 
No evidence of obstruction either you lose and he is your president for keeps

He fired Comey. Obstruction.

Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.


He could fire anyone just because he doesn't like the tie they are wearing....the democrats don't want to tell the truth about anything....

In all seriousness, if obstruction was such a slam dunk case, something would almost certainly have gotten underway by now.


Gosh. I see more nails in the coffin almost every day. OTOH, I don't pay much attention to the "alternative facts" sources. Google is your friend.

Not much of slam dunk yet.
 
Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.

You get fired for investigating something, and he says that's why you were fired, and you think that isn't going to deter the next guy?

There's a reason why a special counsel was appointed.

He could fire anyone just because he doesn't like the tie they are wearing....the democrats don't want to tell the truth about anything....

Um, no, you really can't and shouldn't. But Trump is too dumb to know that.
 
Wrong. He had the authority to do it and no one in their right mind would think removing one person is going to stop an investigation.

You get fired for investigating something, and he says that's why you were fired, and you think that isn't going to deter the next guy?

There's a reason why a special counsel was appointed.

He could fire anyone just because he doesn't like the tie they are wearing....the democrats don't want to tell the truth about anything....

Um, no, you really can't and shouldn't. But Trump is too dumb to know that.
Yes he can actually.

Whether you think he should or should not is irrelevant.

He never said he fired Comey because of an investigation. You are lying about that little part.
 

Forum List

Back
Top