Ozmar
This tree will shoot you.
nraforlife and lilollady, those are the extremely small and unimportant views of the 14th Amendment. Neither of you addressed my points why it would not be amended.
nraforlife has an interesting hook for dems: amend the 14th to deny "personhood" for corporations in order to limit their ability to swamp elections with their dollars. That's interesting, and I bet 3/4s of America would like that to happen.
I see some dissonance between considering a corporation a person for donation purposes, but not allowing a corporation to vote as a registered voter. My point is this: If an entity does not have the capability to vote, and will never have that capability, why are we allowing it to influence funding? (I'm not talking about legal residents, who may eventually become voting citizens.) Corporations can never become voting citizens, so why should these non-person entities have privileges when it comes to campaign financing?