Who Will Be the Next 'America First' President?

[excalibur]

We cannot add more promises to go to war over more countries. We need to regroup.

Trump had planned to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by May, so why would people celebrate Biden's later date?

...

Donald Trump himself weighed in Sunday, saying Biden's decision was "wonderful," but Joe should have stuck to Trump's May 1 deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Adding a veteran's voice to the broad consensus was the American Legion which called for an end to America's "forever war," and repeal of congressional authorizations to fight this war.

...

Let Republicans openly reject the Biden administration's unilateral commitments to fight China for tiny reefs claimed by the Philippines in the South China Sea and Japan in the East China Sea.

And, surely, it is time for that "agonizing reappraisal" of NATO promised by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in the 1950s.

Why are we still committed, under NATO, to go to war with Russia on behalf of Germany, when the Germans, with their Nord Stream 2 pipeline, are doubling their dependency on Russia's natural gas?

According to the Atlantic Council President Richard Haas, the U.S. should abandon its policy of "strategic ambiguity" as to what we would do if China attacks Taiwan — and make a commitment to defend Taiwan.

But why should the United States commit to a war with China for an island President Richard Nixon conceded in 1972 was part of China?

Among the reasons Trump won in 2016 is that he offered a foreign policy of easing tensions with Vladimir Putin's Russia, getting us out of the endless wars of the Middle East, and making free-riding allies pay the cost of their own defense.

Yet, though, currently, we have commitments to fight for 29 NATO nations, there is a push on among our foreign policy elites to add new nations, such as Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Finland and Sweden.

But, again, why surrender our freedom to decide whether to fight?

As for South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, each could build a nuclear deterrent, as Israel, Pakistan and India have done. If a war were to be fought with China that could go nuclear, why would we want to be a mandatory participant?

...​

Who Will Be the Next 'America First' President?, by Patrick Buchanan

When President Joe Biden announced he would withdraw all U. S.

www.creators.com

 

[Claudette]

We need the one and only "Lets Make America Great Again" guy back in office. Sure hope he runs in 2024. He'll get my vote.

Hope we have some of America left if four years.

 

[GLASNOST]

..... why would people celebrate Biden's later date?

... Why are we still committed, under NATO, to go to war with Russia ...​

​

... But why should the United States commit to a war with China ...​

​

... why surrender our freedom to decide whether to fight?​

​

As for South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, each could build a nuclear deterrent, as Israel, Pakistan and India have done. If a war were to be fought with China that could go nuclear, why would we want to be a mandatory participant? ...​

​

Stop asking this silly question "why". The answer is as it has always been ... if there's big money for the military-industrial complex then it's big money for corrupt politicians too. That's why.​

 

[citygator]

This should be in the rubber room. Bwahahaha.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This should be in the rubber room. Bwahahaha.

You belong in a rubber room.

 

[GLASNOST]

This should be in the rubber room. Bwahahaha.

You belong in a rubber room.

I think they are using neoprene these days.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

The country needs to split.
Half for the people that believe in America first, and half who believe America was founded on racism, believes racism is systemic and is throughout the entire structure of the country, and believes in all the other woke shit today.

I have zero desire to live amongst the latter, and would much prefer to not have anything whatsoever to do with these pricks.

This country will never be a united country again. Why bother trying to save a lost cause?

 

[candycorn]

We cannot add more promises to go to war over more countries. We need to regroup.

Trump had planned to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by May, so why would people celebrate Biden's later date?

...​

​

Donald Trump himself weighed in Sunday, saying Biden's decision was "wonderful," but Joe should have stuck to Trump's May 1 deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan.​

​

Adding a veteran's voice to the broad consensus was the American Legion which called for an end to America's "forever war," and repeal of congressional authorizations to fight this war.​

​

...​

​

Let Republicans openly reject the Biden administration's unilateral commitments to fight China for tiny reefs claimed by the Philippines in the South China Sea and Japan in the East China Sea.​

​

And, surely, it is time for that "agonizing reappraisal" of NATO promised by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in the 1950s.​

​

Why are we still committed, under NATO, to go to war with Russia on behalf of Germany, when the Germans, with their Nord Stream 2 pipeline, are doubling their dependency on Russia's natural gas?​

​

According to the Atlantic Council President Richard Haas, the U.S. should abandon its policy of "strategic ambiguity" as to what we would do if China attacks Taiwan — and make a commitment to defend Taiwan.​

​

But why should the United States commit to a war with China for an island President Richard Nixon conceded in 1972 was part of China?​

​

Among the reasons Trump won in 2016 is that he offered a foreign policy of easing tensions with Vladimir Putin's Russia, getting us out of the endless wars of the Middle East, and making free-riding allies pay the cost of their own defense.​

​

Yet, though, currently, we have commitments to fight for 29 NATO nations, there is a push on among our foreign policy elites to add new nations, such as Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Finland and Sweden.​

​

But, again, why surrender our freedom to decide whether to fight?​

​

As for South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, each could build a nuclear deterrent, as Israel, Pakistan and India have done. If a war were to be fought with China that could go nuclear, why would we want to be a mandatory participant?​

​

...​

Who Will Be the Next 'America First' President?, by Patrick Buchanan

When President Joe Biden announced he would withdraw all U. S.

www.creators.com

Nobody believes your blob. He had 4 years to get us out of there.

YOUR
BLOB
FAILED

 

[GLASNOST]

The country needs to split.

Along the Mason-Dixon Line?

This country will never be a united country again. Why bother trying to save a lost cause?

B-b-b-b-u-t it says "one nation under god INDIVISIBLE ... "

 

[gipper]

We cannot add more promises to go to war over more countries. We need to regroup.

Trump had planned to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by May, so why would people celebrate Biden's later date?

...​

​

Donald Trump himself weighed in Sunday, saying Biden's decision was "wonderful," but Joe should have stuck to Trump's May 1 deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan.​

​

Adding a veteran's voice to the broad consensus was the American Legion which called for an end to America's "forever war," and repeal of congressional authorizations to fight this war.​

​

...​

​

Let Republicans openly reject the Biden administration's unilateral commitments to fight China for tiny reefs claimed by the Philippines in the South China Sea and Japan in the East China Sea.​

​

And, surely, it is time for that "agonizing reappraisal" of NATO promised by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in the 1950s.​

​

Why are we still committed, under NATO, to go to war with Russia on behalf of Germany, when the Germans, with their Nord Stream 2 pipeline, are doubling their dependency on Russia's natural gas?​

​

According to the Atlantic Council President Richard Haas, the U.S. should abandon its policy of "strategic ambiguity" as to what we would do if China attacks Taiwan — and make a commitment to defend Taiwan.​

​

But why should the United States commit to a war with China for an island President Richard Nixon conceded in 1972 was part of China?​

​

Among the reasons Trump won in 2016 is that he offered a foreign policy of easing tensions with Vladimir Putin's Russia, getting us out of the endless wars of the Middle East, and making free-riding allies pay the cost of their own defense.​

​

Yet, though, currently, we have commitments to fight for 29 NATO nations, there is a push on among our foreign policy elites to add new nations, such as Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Finland and Sweden.​

​

But, again, why surrender our freedom to decide whether to fight?​

​

As for South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, each could build a nuclear deterrent, as Israel, Pakistan and India have done. If a war were to be fought with China that could go nuclear, why would we want to be a mandatory participant?​

​

...​

Who Will Be the Next 'America First' President?, by Patrick Buchanan

When President Joe Biden announced he would withdraw all U. S.

www.creators.com

You’re not informed. Trump did not seek better relations with Russia, China, Iran, or Venezuela. He made relations worse with all of them. He didn’t start a new war unlike his predecessors. That’s good, but probably dumb luck. His cold blooded murder of the Iranian general easily could have resulted in war. Thank God the Mullahs kept their heads.

 

[Flash]

DeSantis. He has been a fantastic job with "Make Florida Great Again".

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

We need the one and only "Lets Make America Great Again" guy back in office. Sure hope he runs in 2024. He'll get my vote.

Hope we have some of America left if four years.

If he wins the primary, hell get my vote, but I want DeSantis as the next president

 

[GLASNOST]

You’re not informed. Trump did not seek better relations with Russia, China, Iran, or Venezuela. He made relations worse with all of them. He didn’t start a new war unlike his predecessors. That’s good, but probably dumb luck. His cold blooded murder of the Iranian general easily could have resulted in war. Thank God the Mullahs kept their heads.

Good response!

 

[jknowgood]

We cannot add more promises to go to war over more countries. We need to regroup.

Trump had planned to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by May, so why would people celebrate Biden's later date?

...​

​

Donald Trump himself weighed in Sunday, saying Biden's decision was "wonderful," but Joe should have stuck to Trump's May 1 deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan.​

​

Adding a veteran's voice to the broad consensus was the American Legion which called for an end to America's "forever war," and repeal of congressional authorizations to fight this war.​

​

...​

​

Let Republicans openly reject the Biden administration's unilateral commitments to fight China for tiny reefs claimed by the Philippines in the South China Sea and Japan in the East China Sea.​

​

And, surely, it is time for that "agonizing reappraisal" of NATO promised by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in the 1950s.​

​

Why are we still committed, under NATO, to go to war with Russia on behalf of Germany, when the Germans, with their Nord Stream 2 pipeline, are doubling their dependency on Russia's natural gas?​

​

According to the Atlantic Council President Richard Haas, the U.S. should abandon its policy of "strategic ambiguity" as to what we would do if China attacks Taiwan — and make a commitment to defend Taiwan.​

​

But why should the United States commit to a war with China for an island President Richard Nixon conceded in 1972 was part of China?​

​

Among the reasons Trump won in 2016 is that he offered a foreign policy of easing tensions with Vladimir Putin's Russia, getting us out of the endless wars of the Middle East, and making free-riding allies pay the cost of their own defense.​

​

Yet, though, currently, we have commitments to fight for 29 NATO nations, there is a push on among our foreign policy elites to add new nations, such as Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Finland and Sweden.​

​

But, again, why surrender our freedom to decide whether to fight?​

​

As for South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, each could build a nuclear deterrent, as Israel, Pakistan and India have done. If a war were to be fought with China that could go nuclear, why would we want to be a mandatory participant?​

​

...​

Who Will Be the Next 'America First' President?, by Patrick Buchanan

When President Joe Biden announced he would withdraw all U. S.

www.creators.com

Nobody believes your blob. He had 4 years to get us out of there.

YOUR
BLOB
FAILED

YOUR
PEDOPHILE
IS
FAILING
BIG
TIME

 

[Mac-7]

As for South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, each could build a nuclear deterrent, as Israel, Pakistan and India have done. If a war were to be fought with China that could go nuclear, why would we want to be a mandatory participant?

Because those 3 democratic countries are our neighbors and allies

we need them as much as they need us

as long as we remain strong enough to win a war with china I dont think we will have to fight it

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

as long as we remain strong enough to win a war with china I dont think we will have to fight it

President Trump would have kept us strong. Biden's masters will weaken the country like every other Democrat president. America's weakness encourages a war we wont win

 

[GLASNOST]

...... America's weakness encourages a war we wont win

Right you are.

 

[Mac-7]

President Trump would have kept us strong. Biden's masters will weaken the country like every other Democrat president. America's weakness encourages a war we wont win

I agree

dems always skimp on the military.

 

[Canon Shooter]

If he wins the primary, hell get my vote, but I want DeSantis as the next president

I just can't see myself voting for Trump again.

That said, as much as I'd like to see DeSantis become President, I would hate to lose him as my Governor...

 

[GLASNOST]

What the US needs is a Dwight W.