MikeK
Gold Member
Those are absurdly invalid analogies. Prolific creativity produces no negative influences on anyone or anything.How many symphonies did Mozart really have to compose?
Hoe many sculptures did Michelangelo really have to carve?
McCartney is but one example of the negative effects of capitalism on the fields of creative entertainment and sports. The inordinate sums of money generated by these industries is counterproductive to the best interests of the national economy and should be regulated. And you are quite right about the greed factor, access to such massive sums of money fosters that ugly and destructive condition in some.Paul McCartney should have been content to have one Number 1 hit,why was he so greedy?