Who is your prediction to win the Dem Prez nomination

seems to me it's Mayor Pete


He and Klobuchar are the smartest of the bunch, which isn't saying much.

Do you really think an out of the closet homo can win a General?

I do not.


The public just doesn't approve of homosexuality. Their feeling is that its an exit not an entrance. Its going to be tough for the general public to endorse taking it in the caboose, particularly as America has a secret ballot.
Ya... what people are willing to say in public and what they think in private is truly two different things, and the fact of the matter is, the vast majority of people, ON THE PLANET, do not like homos, and they keep that to themselves just so they don't have to deal with the unhinged response from some homo lover leftist.

But BELOW, absolutely is NOT what Americans want to LOOK AT, or HAVE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. Buttplug will have to have his BUTT BUDDY somewhere other than the WHITE HOUSE... because that shit is flat out DISGUSTING...

homo.jpg
 
How was Eisenhower responsible for 'nam?

He is the president the decided to support the creation of South Vietnam in contradiction to the Geneva Treaty. He supported Deim despite the fact the the vast majority of Vietnamese HATED Deim, and he was the first to send U.S. advisors, trainers and military equipment to support Diem.

He had lost the war in Vietnam long before Kennedy, Johnson or Nixon ever became president.

When the religious leaders of a people start burning themselves alive, you have to be an IDIOT not to take heed!

He screwed the pooch royally!

Nullified the 1956 national elections simply because Ho would have won. Doesn't get more straightforward meddlesome than that. And this after Ho had been our ally and a CIA asset resisting Japanese incursion into southeast Asia.
 
Agreed. How many Christian "leaders" will endorse Pistol Pete?

Too many Americans vote the way they are told to vote on Sunday...

Who cares? Religion's got nothing to do with who we vote for. Besides which, they turned out for Rump didn't they?
Well, not counting Utah.
 
seems to me it's Mayor Pete


He and Klobuchar are the smartest of the bunch, which isn't saying much.

Do you really think an out of the closet homo can win a General?

I do not.


The public just doesn't approve of homosexuality. Their feeling is that its an exit not an entrance. Its going to be tough for the general public to endorse taking it in the caboose, particularly as America has a secret ballot.
Ya... what people are willing to say in public and what they think in private is truly two different things, and the fact of the matter is, the vast majority of people, ON THE PLANET, do not like homos, and they keep that to themselves just so they don't have to deal with the unhinged response from some homo lover leftist.

But BELOW, absolutely is NOT what Americans want to LOOK AT, or HAVE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. Buttplug will have to have his BUTT BUDDY somewhere other than the WHITE HOUSE... because that shit is flat out DISGUSTING...

homo.jpg

That's got zero to do with Presidenting anyway.

By that logic this guy should have won in a shutout.

90
 
I'll start.

I think the top 4 in the polls are all paper lions who go down. Pistol Pete is at least intelligent, but an outed gay has no chance in a general, and the Dem elites know that.

I am sticking with Amy Klobuchar, the "last one standing" after the rest are exposed as gutter garbage....

I don't care who wins.
It's a fool's choice.
 
seems to me it's Mayor Pete


He and Klobuchar are the smartest of the bunch, which isn't saying much.

Do you really think an out of the closet homo can win a General?

I do not.


The public just doesn't approve of homosexuality. Their feeling is that its an exit not an entrance. Its going to be tough for the general public to endorse taking it in the caboose, particularly as America has a secret ballot.
Ya... what people are willing to say in public and what they think in private is truly two different things, and the fact of the matter is, the vast majority of people, ON THE PLANET, do not like homos, and they keep that to themselves just so they don't have to deal with the unhinged response from some homo lover leftist.

But BELOW, absolutely is NOT what Americans want to LOOK AT, or HAVE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. Buttplug will have to have his BUTT BUDDY somewhere other than the WHITE HOUSE... because that shit is flat out DISGUSTING...

homo.jpg

That's got zero to do with Presidenting anyway.

By that logic this guy should have won in a shutout.

90
Well, nice try to compare bullets with balloons but, that was a fail.

The majority of people don't like homos... just face it.
 
The majority of people don't like homos... just face it.


Beyond that , most foreign leaders aren't keen on it either. Would Uncle Pooty give Uncle Petey any respect?

How about President Duterte, who successfully gave up the Butt Sex habit?

How about Latin America- where the men are oozing in machismo?
 
Vietnam War Allied Troop Levels 1960-73


grunt2.jpg
Vietnam War
Allied Troop Levels 1960-73
Permission granted to link this site to your Webpage
Vietnam War Allied Troop Levels 1960-73




43.jpg



Allied Troop Levels - Vietnam, 1960 To 1973
Year American SVN Aust. Korea New Zeal Philip Thai
1959
760 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1960
900 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1961
3205 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1962
11300 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1963
16300 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1964
23300 514000 198 200 30 20 --
1965
184300 642500 1560 20620 120 70 20
1966
385300 735900 4530 25570 160 2060 240
1967
485600 798700 6820 47830 530 2020 2200
1968
536100 820000 7660 50000 520 1580 6000
1969
475200 897000 7670 48870 550 190 11570
1970
334600 968000 6800 48450 440 70 11570
1971
156800 1046250 2000 45700 100 50 6000
1972
24200 1048000 130 36790 50 50 40
1973
50 1110000 --


LBJ made it a war....

23000 to 184000 in his first real year.

No, LBJ did not make it a war. He escalated the 'Police action', as it was called.

According to U.S. law there was never a war in Vietnam.

If there had been a war, Jane Fonda could have been charged with treason. Because there was not a war (legally), Fonda could not be charged.

It ain't the size of our involvement, it's whether Congress declared war or not.
 
I think...

... someone who wants free health care for illegals is going to win.
 
Vietnam War Allied Troop Levels 1960-73


grunt2.jpg
Vietnam War
Allied Troop Levels 1960-73
Permission granted to link this site to your Webpage
Vietnam War Allied Troop Levels 1960-73




43.jpg



Allied Troop Levels - Vietnam, 1960 To 1973
Year American SVN Aust. Korea New Zeal Philip Thai
1959
760 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1960
900 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1961
3205 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1962
11300 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1963
16300 243000 -- -- -- -- --
1964
23300 514000 198 200 30 20 --
1965
184300 642500 1560 20620 120 70 20
1966
385300 735900 4530 25570 160 2060 240
1967
485600 798700 6820 47830 530 2020 2200
1968
536100 820000 7660 50000 520 1580 6000
1969
475200 897000 7670 48870 550 190 11570
1970
334600 968000 6800 48450 440 70 11570
1971
156800 1046250 2000 45700 100 50 6000
1972
24200 1048000 130 36790 50 50 40
1973
50 1110000 --


LBJ made it a war....

23000 to 184000 in his first real year.

No, LBJ did not make it a war. He escalated the 'Police action', as it was called.

According to U.S. law there was never a war in Vietnam.

If there had been a war, Jane Fonda could have been charged with treason. Because there was not a war (legally), Fonda could not be charged.

It ain't the size of our involvement, it's whether Congress declared war or not.




Fine, but this is the real issue....


LBJ's "escalation" of the "police action" in 'nam was 100% about running US weapons factories and siphoning off the new arms to ISRAEL free of charge.

This is the proof....


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency



"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move."




Israel wanted arms from JFK, and thought the favorable media coverage JFK got in the 60 election would secure that. JFK did not arm Israel. Hence, he was offed... and replaced by a Zionist Traitor who did.
 

Forum List

Back
Top