BenNatuf
Limit Authority
As far as the deabte goes?
Mitt won because he got much, much more aitime than anyone else and he sounds really good saying nothing. The guys adept at identifying what Obama's doing wrong and then offering himself and his experience as a solution without saying a damned thing about what he'd "do" beyond generalities and bumber sticker talking points. he was only asked to explain himself once last night (by Newt) and he sounded just like a democratic. His best moment was in answer to Cains question where he basically said nothing but pointed out that simple sounds good, but simplistic ain't good.
Newt, Cain and Paul all held their own and niehter hurt nor helped themselves. Newts points were more insightful and thought out and his ability to communicate them was apparent, as always. Cain stayed on message which if you like 9-9-9 is all he had to do, but as always he comes with the bumper sticker and no substance to back it up. I get that he believes in it... why should anyone else? Paul was Paul, philisophically libertarian and I don't have a problem with that, but to go along with that philosophy you have to have a plan to impliment it... he doesn't.
Mitt won because he got much, much more aitime than anyone else and he sounds really good saying nothing. The guys adept at identifying what Obama's doing wrong and then offering himself and his experience as a solution without saying a damned thing about what he'd "do" beyond generalities and bumber sticker talking points. he was only asked to explain himself once last night (by Newt) and he sounded just like a democratic. His best moment was in answer to Cains question where he basically said nothing but pointed out that simple sounds good, but simplistic ain't good.
Newt, Cain and Paul all held their own and niehter hurt nor helped themselves. Newts points were more insightful and thought out and his ability to communicate them was apparent, as always. Cain stayed on message which if you like 9-9-9 is all he had to do, but as always he comes with the bumper sticker and no substance to back it up. I get that he believes in it... why should anyone else? Paul was Paul, philisophically libertarian and I don't have a problem with that, but to go along with that philosophy you have to have a plan to impliment it... he doesn't.