- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
It happens, you immerse yourself in the protest and get caught up in the melee.
It's okay when the people who beat you are cops. It's only a problem when they're black people.
^Publius logic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It happens, you immerse yourself in the protest and get caught up in the melee.
It happens, you immerse yourself in the protest and get caught up in the melee.
It's okay when the people who beat you are cops. It's only a problem when they're black people.
^Publius logic.
Wouldn't respecting the Bill of Rights entail innocent until proven guilty?.
The same presumption of innocence that you've given black people in Baltimore?
I still don't see where you claim the cops were wrong. Your logic is the cops beat a guy so the cops were wrong. There is no evidence to support your claim. Only an allegation. We don't know what were the circumstances of the reporter getting injured by the police do we?
I love it when people attempt to correct a wrong with what they perceive to be another wrong. But I'm game. Which of my claims are you referencing specifically? If you want me to assume black thugs rioting in the streets as innocent little lambs, well then, the video undercuts that presumption. I can't think of a legitimate reason for a thug to smash in a police car window unless he's helping the cops collect on the insurance claim.