While I am a Trump supporter,

Biden ~ A New World Order is out there, and we want to lead it. (They will lead us, we won't be leading them.) They plan to have control by 2030. The method of control will be Central Bank Digital Currency. Our banks are installing the systems now.

Trump ~ NO CBDC. NO NEW WORLD ORDER.

We will have become the biggest threat to democracy if we don't vote to stop this global take over. Vote accordingly, because nothing else matters if we lose our freedom...
 
I do admit that he makes it easy for some to dislike him. He’s everything the social justice warriors insist that we despise. He’s a white male multi-billionaire who had a privileged childhood. He has a jaded history with the ladies, and is inclined to get into verbal battles that would be better avoided. In other words: he’s just as flawed as the rest of us. But I realize that his unlikability to some is actually his superpower. He causes the Left to act out a self-destructive demonstration of their corrosiveness to the American experiment.

The radicals falsely perceive Trump’s personality as a weakness, drawing them into attacks that reveal their true nature. He’s the cheese, which temps the rats into the transparency trap. He triggers them into openly demonstrating their utter disregard for basic fairness and the rule of law -- things which most Americans still hold dear. Blinded by their hatred, the radicals can’t see that their actions offend most Americans, and result in unintended consequences.
The Left demonizes Trump without realizing that we don’t judge him by the contents of his heart. That’s God’s jurisdiction. We only care about his deeds -- which have been 100 percent beneficial to the citizens of the United States.
We also don’t care about what’s in the hearts of his opponents. We instead are judging them by their deeds, and we’re finding those deeds very disturbing. They have:
  • Trashed our civil rights,
  • Corrupted any notion of due process,
  • Weaponized the government against its citizens, and
  • Destroyed civil debate (i.e., calling opponents fascists).
It was all done to crush one man -- with no acknowledgement of the individual liberties which the Constitution guarantees.
The attorney general of New York, Letitia James, found a friendly judge and got a $464.5 million settlement and a suspension of Trump’s right to do business in New York. He was found guilty of defrauding banks, who claim they weren’t defrauded -- making it a victimless crime, if it was a crime at all. The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

E. Jean Carroll got an $83 million settlement from Trump for the liable of denying that he had raped her -- even though she can’t remember the year in which it supposedly happened. But she had a friendly New York jury, and she was relying on Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) to triumph over a preponderance of the evidence. The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicted Trump for a campaign finance violation, which the federal election commission ruled wasn’t illegal, and for which the statute of limitations had expired. But by calling it a “conspiracy,” Bragg was able to extend the statute of limitations, even if the act still wasn’t illegal. Bragg is counting on a TDS afflicted judge and jury also. Is that anyone’s idea of justice -- seeking a conviction because you can, rather than because you should? The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump for the same crime that Joe Biden committed -- having classified documents in his possession (but without Presidential authority in Biden’s case). Special Counsel Robert Hur explained that Biden wouldn’t be indicted because the jury would find him a “likeable old gentleman.” Left unsaid is what that statement reveals: Trump was indicted because he would come across as unlikeable, while Biden was excused because a jury would find him likeable. Again, justice has been turned into the pursuit of the unlikeable, rather than the guilty. Is that what the Supreme Court building inscription “Equal Justice Under Law” intends? The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis indicted Trump for the same action that every losing Democrat since Al Gore has committed -- challenging the outcome of the election with every legal means available. When Al Franken overturned an election in Minnesota, it was a defense of democracy. When Donald Trump didn’t overturn an election, it was a criminal conspiracy in violation of racketeering laws -- because he talked to people about his legal options. We’re not supposed to notice that what is justice for a Democrat is conspiracy for a Republican. Fani got her mugshot, and Trump’s campaign donations came rolling in. The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

One must ask: why did the radicals think they would benefit from such public displays of raw political corruption? Was it because they presumed that our values were aligned with theirs? Did they think that we hated Donald Trump more than we loved our republic? Were they expecting us to celebrate the destruction of due process -- if it was to “save our democracy”?


Surprise! The leftists were wrong. We value our country far more than any one man. We will not excuse them for trashing our justice system -- to “save our democracy.” Unlike them, we know that “saving our republic” depends on fairness -- especially towards those whom we may dislike. Lady Justice wears a blindfold for reasons which we understand -- and they clearly don’t.
The Left’s hatred of Donald Trump caused them to show the public their complete disdain for legal norms. In their lust to attack him, they revealed the lengths to which they are willing to go in attacking our republic. Considerations of justice, fairness, and the common good were of no consequence in their decision making.
Leftists put the question to us: Do you dislike Donald Trump enough to excuse us for trashing legal norms to keep him out of office? We have given them a resounding: No! But rather than hear us, the radicals continue to do the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result. They refuse to accept reality -- that we prefer the America of our founding over the North Cuba which they are creating. So, they continue to attack, and MAGA continues to grow.

I agree with the part that trump gets into needless name calling spats, they are needless and petty. It’s one of the reasons I’m not a trump supporter. I think the office of president deserves a certain level of dignity, despite my opposition to most left wing policies, I think Obama was “presidential”, I even think Biden is “presidential”.

To hold that office I think you have to conduct yourself in a certain way, and I simply don’t believe trump has that level of dignity. He’s not “presidential”.

That’s just my take on it. (Suits up for the inevitable flame throwers)…
 
I agree with the part that trump gets into needless name calling spats, they are needless and petty. It’s one of the reasons I’m not a trump supporter. I think the office of president deserves a certain level of dignity, despite my opposition to most left wing policies, I think Obama was “presidential”, I even think Biden is “presidential”.

To hold that office I think you have to conduct yourself in a certain way, and I simply don’t believe trump has that level of dignity. He’s not “presidential”.

That’s just my take on it. (Suits up for the inevitable flame throwers)…
In a better world I agree with some of what you say. Obama as much as I disagreed with him was good in front of the camera, but he unleashed the DOJ and IRS on his political opposition as is Biden who may not have Trump's mouthy ways but is not really Presidential. Hard times this day and age.
 
In a better world I agree with some of what you say. Obama as much as I disagreed with him was good in front of the camera, but he unleashed the DOJ and IRS on his political opposition as is Biden who may not have Trump's mouthy ways but is not really Presidential. Hard times this day and age.

Off prompter, Obama was a younger Biden.
 
I agree with the part that trump gets into needless name calling spats, they are needless and petty. It’s one of the reasons I’m not a trump supporter. I think the office of president deserves a certain level of dignity, despite my opposition to most left wing policies, I think Obama was “presidential”, I even think Biden is “presidential”.

To hold that office I think you have to conduct yourself in a certain way, and I simply don’t believe trump has that level of dignity. He’s not “presidential”.

That’s just my take on it. (Suits up for the inevitable flame throwers)…
Yep.

On one hand, there are issues than can be discussed and debated. Fortunately we live in a country in which that is possible. On the other hand, there is the way that discussion and debate are conducted.

It just isn't too much to ask that needed discussion and debate are conducted with decency, intelligence, honesty, and some degree of fundamental civility. Those are not signs of weakness or capitulation. Normally.
 
In a better world I agree with some of what you say. Obama as much as I disagreed with him was good in front of the camera, but he unleashed the DOJ and IRS on his political opposition as is Biden who may not have Trump's mouthy ways but is not really Presidential. Hard times this day and age.
Sure. Again, I don’t agree with their policies and actions, but the way they conducted themselves was more befitting the presidency than what trump does.
 
Democrats are complete gutter rats who bloviate vile hate speech 24/7, Trump is just fighting fire with fire.

Yep, I agree with you in that dems use a lot of hateful and divisive rhetoric, but you don’t see them doing this name calling and, what I consider to be a childish way of talking about people.

Look, I just don’t think trumps outward appearance is a good look for the country. Back when he was younger, he seemed to carry himself differently, he seemed much more refined. These days, he just seems to be very crass and petty. The silly name calling and one upsmanship just doesn’t look good.
 
Yep, I agree with you in that dems use a lot of hateful and divisive rhetoric, but you don’t see them doing this name calling and, what I consider to be a childish way of talking about people.

Look, I just don’t think trumps outward appearance is a good look for the country. Back when he was younger, he seemed to carry himself differently, he seemed much more refined. These days, he just seems to be very crass and petty. The silly name calling and one upsmanship just doesn’t look good.

“I try to step back and remember my first shallow reaction. The day I realized it can be smart to be shallow was, for me, a deep experience.” - Donald Trump

His primitive superficiality was a character choice he grew into.
 
Yep, I agree with you in that dems use a lot of hateful and divisive rhetoric, but you don’t see them doing this name calling
No? Catch up to the present, Joe Biden stated this week that name calling is his new campaign strategy. He intends to use insults and name calling to trigger Trump. He's already started with a rant taunting Trump calling him a loser.
 
You drink a lot of that cult cool-aid don't you?
If you mean I'm well informed of the truth you would be correct... now maybe you should catch up and stop letting the TDS lib media do your thinking for you......
 
“I try to step back and remember my first shallow reaction. The day I realized it can be smart to be shallow was, for me, a deep experience.” - Donald Trump

His primitive superficiality was a character choice he grew into.
I found the CNN article from where you sourced that quote, and for transparency, that quote was preceded by:

“And to make creative choices, he writes: ”

Now, what that means, I don’t know, but it seems it had something to do with his process of creativity. Again, I’m not sure what that means.

Also, CNN is the only place I found that quote, and they don’t source it. They only say:

CNN scoured thousands of pages of books, speeches, profiles and television interview transcripts from the past three decades to stitch together a portrait based entirely on the Republican presidential front-runner’s own words.

The part in bold is where many will question the credibility of their research.

Don’t get me wrong, I thoroughly believe trump is a narcissist, but then so is every other presidential candidate. You kind of have to be to believe YOU are the only one who can lead the country and that is why everyone must vote for you.
 
No? Catch up to the present, Joe Biden stated this week that name calling is his new campaign strategy. He intends to use insults and name calling to trigger Trump. He's already started with a rant taunting Trump calling him a loser.
Well, if Biden resorts to that, then he will be in the same boat, as far as I’m concerned.
 
I do admit that he makes it easy for some to dislike him. He’s everything the social justice warriors insist that we despise. He’s a white male multi-billionaire who had a privileged childhood. He has a jaded history with the ladies, and is inclined to get into verbal battles that would be better avoided. In other words: he’s just as flawed as the rest of us. But I realize that his unlikability to some is actually his superpower. He causes the Left to act out a self-destructive demonstration of their corrosiveness to the American experiment.

The radicals falsely perceive Trump’s personality as a weakness, drawing them into attacks that reveal their true nature. He’s the cheese, which temps the rats into the transparency trap. He triggers them into openly demonstrating their utter disregard for basic fairness and the rule of law -- things which most Americans still hold dear. Blinded by their hatred, the radicals can’t see that their actions offend most Americans, and result in unintended consequences.
The Left demonizes Trump without realizing that we don’t judge him by the contents of his heart. That’s God’s jurisdiction. We only care about his deeds -- which have been 100 percent beneficial to the citizens of the United States.
We also don’t care about what’s in the hearts of his opponents. We instead are judging them by their deeds, and we’re finding those deeds very disturbing. They have:
  • Trashed our civil rights,
  • Corrupted any notion of due process,
  • Weaponized the government against its citizens, and
  • Destroyed civil debate (i.e., calling opponents fascists).
It was all done to crush one man -- with no acknowledgement of the individual liberties which the Constitution guarantees.
The attorney general of New York, Letitia James, found a friendly judge and got a $464.5 million settlement and a suspension of Trump’s right to do business in New York. He was found guilty of defrauding banks, who claim they weren’t defrauded -- making it a victimless crime, if it was a crime at all. The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

E. Jean Carroll got an $83 million settlement from Trump for the liable of denying that he had raped her -- even though she can’t remember the year in which it supposedly happened. But she had a friendly New York jury, and she was relying on Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) to triumph over a preponderance of the evidence. The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicted Trump for a campaign finance violation, which the federal election commission ruled wasn’t illegal, and for which the statute of limitations had expired. But by calling it a “conspiracy,” Bragg was able to extend the statute of limitations, even if the act still wasn’t illegal. Bragg is counting on a TDS afflicted judge and jury also. Is that anyone’s idea of justice -- seeking a conviction because you can, rather than because you should? The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump for the same crime that Joe Biden committed -- having classified documents in his possession (but without Presidential authority in Biden’s case). Special Counsel Robert Hur explained that Biden wouldn’t be indicted because the jury would find him a “likeable old gentleman.” Left unsaid is what that statement reveals: Trump was indicted because he would come across as unlikeable, while Biden was excused because a jury would find him likeable. Again, justice has been turned into the pursuit of the unlikeable, rather than the guilty. Is that what the Supreme Court building inscription “Equal Justice Under Law” intends? The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis indicted Trump for the same action that every losing Democrat since Al Gore has committed -- challenging the outcome of the election with every legal means available. When Al Franken overturned an election in Minnesota, it was a defense of democracy. When Donald Trump didn’t overturn an election, it was a criminal conspiracy in violation of racketeering laws -- because he talked to people about his legal options. We’re not supposed to notice that what is justice for a Democrat is conspiracy for a Republican. Fani got her mugshot, and Trump’s campaign donations came rolling in. The Left attacked (action) and MAGA grew (unintended consequence).

One must ask: why did the radicals think they would benefit from such public displays of raw political corruption? Was it because they presumed that our values were aligned with theirs? Did they think that we hated Donald Trump more than we loved our republic? Were they expecting us to celebrate the destruction of due process -- if it was to “save our democracy”?


Surprise! The leftists were wrong. We value our country far more than any one man. We will not excuse them for trashing our justice system -- to “save our democracy.” Unlike them, we know that “saving our republic” depends on fairness -- especially towards those whom we may dislike. Lady Justice wears a blindfold for reasons which we understand -- and they clearly don’t.
The Left’s hatred of Donald Trump caused them to show the public their complete disdain for legal norms. In their lust to attack him, they revealed the lengths to which they are willing to go in attacking our republic. Considerations of justice, fairness, and the common good were of no consequence in their decision making.
Leftists put the question to us: Do you dislike Donald Trump enough to excuse us for trashing legal norms to keep him out of office? We have given them a resounding: No! But rather than hear us, the radicals continue to do the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result. They refuse to accept reality -- that we prefer the America of our founding over the North Cuba which they are creating. So, they continue to attack, and MAGA continues to grow.


I don't support Trump because of legitimate fiscally conservative reasons.

He's a big spending, big government dem lite who's assaulted our constitution and our liberties on several occasions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top