SniperFire
Senior Member
I already answered that in my above post
No, you didn't mention the lies by all of those Democrats, at all.
Did you just mean all the Democrat lies were 'hot air,' but not the rest?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I already answered that in my above post
I already answered that in my above post
No, you didn't mention the lies by all of those Democrats, at all.
Did you just mean all the Democrat lies were 'hot air,' but not the rest?
I didn't see you mention anything about the above quoted comments at all, unless the bag of hot air comment is saying that I made them up. To which I absolutely did not. All of you democrats after 9-11 supported the war on terror, well 90% I'm sure. You've lost your taste for it. Now you sit and blame a single person for going into Iraq, which is pure hyperbole. The liberal crutch.
My optimistic thoughts on the Iraq war...
After 9-11 tragically happened, President Bush declared a war on terror. A broad war agreed, but supported nontheless by republicans and most democrats. In a speech just after the attacks he said:
"Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated....
And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."
Iraq made their decision. They provided a safe haven for terrorists. Some very famous ones actually. The Senate voted 77-23 and the House 296-133 to authorize OIF. Also the Senate voted 98-0 and the House 420-1 to authorize the AMUF.
We've been after Sadam for quite a while, early 90's at least. We've tried coups, baiting the citizens to rebel on the radio, and other ways. Intelligence insisted Iraq had or was attempting to make WMD's, Sadam refused to let the UN inspectors in. Time and time again he refused. This leads one to believe you're hiding something. After the invasion we never found Nuclear weapons or nuclear WMD's, but we relieved a population of a cruel dictator. That's not enough? Well we've sent troops to Bosnia, Kosovo, Haiti, and Somalia for humanitarian reasons. Do you openly disagree with all of those? We also found thousands of tons of enriched uranium, and warheads filled with sarin gas.
Iraq became a terrorist breeding ground after the invasion and since then we've been killing terrorists in rapid fashion. More so in the beginning before the rediculous ROE's, and people in places other than on the ground making decisions that really put our troops in bad situations.
To put the cost into perspective.. while both wars were ongoing. We spent more per month on social programs (welfare, disability..etc) than on BOTH wars in Afghan and Iraq COMBINED. All in all, taking all of this into account. I truly believe we've prevented further terrorist attacks on US soil. Many attacks. Maybe another 9/11. To me that is worth the financil cost, saving innocent American lives.
Great reply, great way to get your views out there. This isn't wingnuttery, some of it is research, and some is personal experience.
I do not dislike social programs, I think too many Americans are on them, and that they are very abused.
I will vote for Romney as I sincerely believe 4 more years of Obama will be destructive to the country I have served, and love. You rabid, leftwing, self loathing liberals are doing everything you can to make us the next Greece.
Thanks for the link Lakhota, but I've been there, in person. You should check out those pics though.
I realize I'm not the only veteran, but I think being there first hand gives veterans a unique viewpoint. Even if some of those viewpoints are opposite of mine, I do respect their opinions.
I respect yours as well, I do wish you would explain it more thoroughly. What are your feelings on all of those comments those democrats made that I posted earlier?
The point is that, when a poster criticized Bush, you jumped in to defend him by pointing to someone who you believe is worse.I ain't defending shit, chump.There you go, defending your boy Bush again.Right...And the 58,000+ American boys killed by LBJ on a pack of lies was so much chump change.
Your claims to not be a BushBot are almost as big a joke as you are.
But maybe you can come up with a good rationale for sending more than 58,000 American men to their deaths, over a total lie known as "Gulf of Tonkin Incident".
G'head...We're all waiting with baited breath.
Only Bush defenders use 'BOOOOSH!'Over 58,000 dead young men, and all you can say is BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!
Goddammit, are you an asshole.
Only Bush defenders use 'BOOOOSH!'Over 58,000 dead young men, and all you can say is BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!
Goddammit, are you an asshole.
And how many of those 58,000 were under Nixon, retard?
It was Jimmy Carter until obama. It will take several generations to undo obama's damage if it can be done at all.
The poll is about long-term damage. There's no way Obama could have already committed long-term damage. If you think Carter has, then you can tell us what damage he committed.
You can hear a sigh of relief in plains Georgia, Jimmy Carter has been surpassed by obama as America worse president, of the 20TH century
obama had the distinction of being the first worst president of the 21ST century, and also the worse president of all time
Carter.... 444 days that convinced Islamic fundamentalists that there were no repercussions for terrorism and ultimately led us to today.
The point is that, when a poster criticized Bush, you jumped in to defend him by pointing to someone who you believe is worse.I ain't defending shit, chump.There you go, defending your boy Bush again.
Your claims to not be a BushBot are almost as big a joke as you are.
But maybe you can come up with a good rationale for sending more than 58,000 American men to their deaths, over a total lie known as "Gulf of Tonkin Incident".
G'head...We're all waiting with baited breath.
You're transparent, retard.
The poll is about long-term damage. There's no way Obama could have already committed long-term damage. If you think Carter has, then you can tell us what damage he committed.
You can hear a sigh of relief in plains Georgia, Jimmy Carter has been surpassed by obama as America worse president, of the 20TH century
obama had the distinction of being the first worst president of the 21ST century, and also the worse president of all time
It's too early to judge Obama's presidency against historical standards. But I doubt he can beat James Buchanan, Franklin Pierce, Jimmy Carter, and a few others who were really bad presidents.