Which of these two people would get fired first?

Which man most likely to get fired first?

  • A

    Votes: 9 64.3%
  • B

    Votes: 3 21.4%
  • equally probable

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • Total voters
    14

OohPooPahDoo

Gold Member
May 11, 2011
15,347
985
175
N'Awlins Mid-City
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?
 
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

You could at least make it sorta realistic. NO ONE is going to hire an unknown young man as CEO and it is highly unlikely that anyone would hire an unknown as head chef either.

Of course you are trying to claim that CEO's do nothing so an unknown could survive. But that is simply not true.
 
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

It depends.

.
 
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

You could at least make it sorta realistic. NO ONE is going to hire an unknown young man as CEO and it is highly unlikely that anyone would hire an unknown as head chef either.

Of course you are trying to claim that CEO's do nothing so an unknown could survive. But that is simply not true.


Congratulations. You've won an argument with yourself.
 
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

It depends.

.

On what? Everything else is the same. Each has the same education, the same training. Only the job is different.
 
Last edited:
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

It depends.

.

On what? Everything else is the same. Each has the same education, the same training. Only the job is different.

Well, for starters what if the restaurant that the cook works at is closed until next week because the kitchen wasn't up to health code standards? And all the while, the CEO has to give his first major boardroom presentation within a day of getting hired...

In that above example I'd say that the CEO would probably get fired first (after the shareholders see how incompetent he/she was at running a full-fledged company).

Also, what sort of company is the CEO the head of? That would certainly make a difference in answering your question (as companies comes in all shapes, sizes, and complexities).
 
With Obamacare, the small businesses are being destroyed, so probably the chef would lose his job first. If the second guy works at a big company that donates to Democrats, he'll survive even if he runs the company into the ground because the company will get a bail out and bonuses. If the company didn't contribute to Obama, then he'll cap CEO salaries, bad mouth them to the press and find a way to bring them down.
 
Better question:

Who goes to jail first?

A) The CEO who rips off millions from regular Joes like you and me through illegal trading and dirty schemes?

B) Regular Joe who steals a pack of ham from Wal-Mart to feed his kids?
 
Better question:

Who goes to jail first?

A) The CEO who rips off millions from regular Joes like you and me through illegal trading and dirty schemes?

B) Regular Joe who steals a pack of ham from Wal-Mart to feed his kids?

A goes to jail first. My brother got fired for stealing from his company. They didn't have him arrested.

Your opinion of business is total bullshit.
 
The head cook. CEO's can literally drive a company down and still not be fired while their pay doubles or even triples.

Unions and their "anti hostile takeover" legislation are to blame for that.
 
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

You could at least make it sorta realistic. NO ONE is going to hire an unknown young man as CEO and it is highly unlikely that anyone would hire an unknown as head chef either.

Of course you are trying to claim that CEO's do nothing so an unknown could survive. But that is simply not true.

What the racist was implying in the OP is that whites get jobs just because they're white.
 
Imagine two white males with identical qualifications - A and B. They each have a high school diploma and no work experience whatsoever. Neither has any experience cooking anything past boiling water or running a business past a lemonade stand. Somehow or another they fool potential employers and they each land a job. Each lands a different job. Man A gets a job as the head cook at mid sized restaurant. Man B gets a job as the CEO of a major corporation.

Which man is most likely to get fired first?

From experience with CEOs..

A would be fired almost immediately.

B?

Golden parachute. After many disastrous years.
 

Forum List

Back
Top