Which Is More Likely to Prevent School Shootings?

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
92,079
63,006
2,605
Right coast, classified
Which sign is more likely to keep someone who intends to murder children from acting on their hatred?
ArmedTeachers.png


Bonus in my opinion is with armed teachers student discipline will be greatly increased.
 
What we know *didn't* change and so could not possibly be driving any change in gun violence.

second.jpg
 
Something has changed.

View attachment 177902

Wonder what it was?

Depends on what makes up the data in your chart.
Most likely it contains bogus school shootings, as previously uncovered the alarming statistics being used by the left included instances where students brought empty guns (no shooting)...one was an accidental shot by a police officer during a demonstration, several instances of students who brought to school BB Buns and air pistols....all were counted as a School shooting event.
 
Something has changed.

View attachment 177902

Wonder what it was?

View attachment 177901
seems to me that when the flaming liberals came out of the closet back in the 1960s and if it feels good, just do it, went into full force, all those killings started 10 fold. Want to stop the killings? Round up every fucking miserable liberal and ship them to Cuba, let them deal with the wretches...
 
Which sign is more likely to keep someone who intends to murder children from acting on their hatred?
View attachment 177891

Bonus in my opinion is with armed teachers student discipline will be greatly increased.
Oh and by the way, I say the RIGHT SIGN would prevent innocent children from being executed by liberals who hate overpopulation and born and unborn babies...
 
Depends on what makes up the data in your chart.
Most likely it contains bogus school shootings, as previously uncovered the alarming statistics being used by the left included instances where students brought empty guns (no shooting)...one was an accidental shot by a police officer during a demonstration, several instances of students who brought to school BB Buns and air pistols....all were counted as a School shooting event.

Actually it doesnt depend on it for the point I was making. I doubt there is any entirely accurate data but we all know something has changed. Yeah I read that article wherein for example a student criminal justice class meeting off campus accidentally discharged a weapon they were being trained on and those anti-gun nutjobs counted it as a school shooting.
I dont know how accurate the chart is. I got it from wikipedia. But I feel like the trend is accurate. even if it ,might not be scientifically rigorous in its data. I am open to correction on it. File:School shooting deaths injuries by decade.png - Wikipedia

But my point is, whether the rate went up or down the 2nd amendment didnt change. Look to another variable for any uptick in violence. I myself lay the blame on the liberal destruction of our culture.
 
Depends on what makes up the data in your chart.
Most likely it contains bogus school shootings, as previously uncovered the alarming statistics being used by the left included instances where students brought empty guns (no shooting)...one was an accidental shot by a police officer during a demonstration, several instances of students who brought to school BB Buns and air pistols....all were counted as a School shooting event.

Actually it doesnt depend on it for the point I was making. I doubt there is any entirely accurate data but we all know something has changed. Yeah I read that article wherein for example a student criminal justice class meeting off campus accidentally discharged a weapon they were being trained on and those anti-gun nutjobs counted it as a school shooting.
I dont know how accurate the chart is. I got it from wikipedia. But I feel like the trend is accurate. even if it ,might not be scientifically rigorous in its data. I am open to correction on it. File:School shooting deaths injuries by decade.png - Wikipedia

But my point is, whether the rate went up or down the 2nd amendment didnt change. Look to another variable for any uptick in violence. I myself lay the blame on the liberal destruction of our culture.
my point is, whether the rate went up or down the 2nd amendment didnt change.
Back when I was growing up this was our entertainment.



Todays entertainment



Nothing about culture corrosion and the lefts push to marginalize violence, does it?
 
Something has changed.

View attachment 177902

Wonder what it was?

View attachment 177901
seems to me that when the flaming liberals came out of the closet back in the 1960s and if it feels good, just do it, went into full force, all those killings started 10 fold. Want to stop the killings? Round up every fucking miserable liberal and ship them to Cuba, let them deal with the wretches...

Poor Cuba. It already has been destroyed by leftists. More than 10% of its population have fled their socialist paradise...and those are only the ones who could escape that giant prison.

Imagine..they fled free healthcare, free college and strict gun control for the US...only to find Marxists working the same poison here!
 
Todays entertainment



Nothing about culture corrosion and the lefts push to marginalize violence, does it?


My kids watch the show Grease. I have never seen it myself other than as background while driving on trips when it was playing on the entertainment system in the car. They were fascinated with this lost exotic culture called "America". The nation that was stolen from them.


grease.jpg
 
What we know *didn't* change and so could not possibly be driving any change in gun violence.

View attachment 177903
What's well regulated about rampant and extreme abuses of a consumer good? We're in a territory where the gun culture and mass destruction industry are no longer protected by the 2nd amendment. They have failed to self regulate so it will be on the government to do so.
 

Forum List

Back
Top