healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,325
- 10,775
- 900
Would you Keystone critics explain how you are in favor of 1 million barrels shipped daily waiting for another Exxon Valdez disaster when there is:
1) Less of a risk of a pipeline being damaged by crew mistakes,weather,etc.
AND
2) if something DID happened in one mile of pipeline less then 325 barrels would spill.
Really folks WHY are environmentalists so in favor of another Exxon Valdez when a pipeline will do LESS DAMAGE! The total foot print of the 2,147 mile pipeline is less then
10 square miles at 25 feet width for pipeline.
Again.. Exxon Valdez DAMAGED 1,000s of SQUARE MILES of the ocean and coastlines, killed 100,000+ of wildlife and BILLIONS of dollars in costs!
1) Less of a risk of a pipeline being damaged by crew mistakes,weather,etc.
AND
2) if something DID happened in one mile of pipeline less then 325 barrels would spill.
Really folks WHY are environmentalists so in favor of another Exxon Valdez when a pipeline will do LESS DAMAGE! The total foot print of the 2,147 mile pipeline is less then
10 square miles at 25 feet width for pipeline.
Again.. Exxon Valdez DAMAGED 1,000s of SQUARE MILES of the ocean and coastlines, killed 100,000+ of wildlife and BILLIONS of dollars in costs!