When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

[Crepitus]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

First of all, John Solomon, an OPINION writer, has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals.

But much more important is the very FACT that Carter Page WAS working with Russian spies (who referred to him as a greedy idiot) AND was nonetheless hired by the moronic Trump campaign.

How fucked up are Trump ass kissers in NOT understanding that the FISA warrants were prompted precisely because a Trump staffer WAS a damn collaborator with Russian spies?

Since John Solomon is an OPINION writer, you would be what?

Correct.

 

[bripat9643]

Actually, much has already been done, firings, forced retirement, etc.

Yeah, nope.

Where was The Hill wrong?

They were dead on.

Yeah... Nope.

Yet you refuse to point out where The Hill is wrong.

Which makes you a pathetic partisan liar.

For starters, it's an Op/Ed by a conservative, not a news article. Second, it's just a re-hash of crap the conservatives have been pushing for months to keep.their minds offa the real stuff.

What "real stuff?"

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah, nope.

Where was The Hill wrong?

They were dead on.

Yeah... Nope.

Yet you refuse to point out where The Hill is wrong.

Which makes you a pathetic partisan liar.

For starters, it's an Op/Ed by a conservative, not a news article. Second, it's just a re-hash of crap the conservatives have been pushing for months to keep.their minds offa the real stuff.

What "real stuff?"

Look at a non rwnj news site once in a while.

 

[easyt65]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

The FBI was run by Obama criminals:

Protected Hillary from indictment / prison

Conspiracy / Coup Against Trump

Obstruction

Evidence Tampering
- Altering Witness Testimony After Given

Illegal Wire-Tapping / Spying

FISA Court Abuses

Perjury

Intimidation / Extortion

Violation Of Whistleblower Act

All exposed, all proven with evidence...

....which is why the FBI leadership under Obama have either been FIRED or have flees like rats from a sinking ship!

 

[Oddball]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

Obama makes Nixon look like a cub scout and the Press still adores him

The biggest difference in the Presidencies of Nixon, Obama and Trump is the Media. With Nixon and now with Trump, we have a Media obsession with taking down the President that is relentless. With Obama, the glaring corruption and dereliction of duty was completely ignored by an adoring Media. That cannot be overstated. The power of the Media to influence in the modern era is enormous much more so than when the Media only had the printed word.

Inside of every Liberal there is a Totalitarian screaming to get out, and now the Left is censoring the internet

 

[jc456]

Rushed to Approval by Obama Bin Spying who once again abused his power and the power of Goverment to attack his enemies. These are impeachable offenses and he needs to be made accountable for them.

IMPEACH 44!

Impeach 44? You understand Obama hasn't been president for a while, and you can't impeach someone who isn't in office, don't you goober?

he can still be impeached.

Please list all the times anyone has ever been impeached after leaving office.

what's that got to do with anything? LOL. your question should be is it allowed.

 

[kwc57]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

First of all, John Solomon, an OPINION writer, has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals.

But much more important is the very FACT that Carter Page WAS working with Russian spies (who referred to him as a greedy idiot) AND was nonetheless hired by the moronic Trump campaign.

How fucked up are Trump ass kissers in NOT understanding that the FISA warrants were prompted precisely because a Trump staffer WAS a damn collaborator with Russian spies?

Where do you dig this BS up?

Why Carter Page Was Worth Watching - POLITICO Magazine
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/03/carter-page-nunes-memo-216934
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/.../carter-page-nunes-memo-21693...
Feb 3, 2018 - The Russian spies, however, had one promising lead. ... In 1998 Page spent three monthsworking for the Eurasia Group, a strategy consulting ...
Trump-Russia: FBI believed Carter Page 'collaborated and conspired ...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ration-releases-carter-page-wiretap-documents
https://www.theguardian.com/.../trump-administration-releases-carter-page-wiretap-do...
Jul 22, 2018 - Former Trump advisor Carter Page denies working as Russian spy – ... to the surveillance of the former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, ...
Carter Page denies FBI claims he was Russian agent - BBC News
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44918133
Ex-Trump aide denies being Russian agent
Jul 22, 2018 - Documents show the FBI believed Carter Page was "collaborating and ... allegations that he worked with the Russian government during the 2016 US ... power to authorise wiretaps and surveillance of suspected foreign spies, ...
Was Carter Page a Spy? For the Russians? Or for the US? - Newsweek

LOL You criticize someone for posting an article you claim is written by a conservative opinion writer by posting something from a liberal opinion writer as if it is gospel. That's rich.

 

[EasyPeasy]

Counter what? It's all already been proven to be bullshit over and over again. It's just being revived as an attempted distraction.

Again.

Well, when the shit storm is about to hit, Trump ass kissers have NO choice but to distract to keep their base united in fucked up stupidity and ignorance.

Yes, any day now, any day now.

 

[nat4900]

LOL You criticize someone for posting an article you claim is written by a conservative opinion writer by posting something from a liberal opinion writer as if it is gospel. That's rich.

NO, moron....I posted that article to show smarter conservatives than you that opinions are like assholes........lol

 

[nat4900]

With Obama, the glaring corruption and dereliction of duty was completely ignored by an adoring Media.

"....and Hannity will be right back after these commercials......"

 

[dudmuck]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

The FBI was run by Obama criminals:

Protected Hillary from indictment / prison

Conspiracy / Coup Against Trump

Obstruction

Evidence Tampering
- Altering Witness Testimony After Given

Illegal Wire-Tapping / Spying

FISA Court Abuses

Perjury

Intimidation / Extortion

Violation Of Whistleblower Act

All exposed, all proven with evidence...

....which is why the FBI leadership under Obama have either been FIRED or have flees like rats from a sinking ship!

Thats all a bunch of hot air.
You guys are just a conspiracy to seize power, under Putin.

 

[kwc57]

LOL You criticize someone for posting an article you claim is written by a conservative opinion writer by posting something from a liberal opinion writer as if it is gospel. That's rich.

NO, moron....I posted that article to show smarter conservatives than you that opinions are like assholes........lol

No Natalie, you posted a liberal opinion piece that caters to your personal confirmation bias as if it were somehow more valid than a conservative opinion piece. That makes you a clueless partisan douche nozzle......which we've all known for years.

 

[nat4900]

No Natalie, you posted a liberal opinion piece that caters to your personal confirmation bias as if it were somehow more valid than a conservative opinion piece. That makes you a clueless partisan douche nozzle......which we've all known for years.

Go back to bed....(after another long drink of orange kool-aid) .LOL

 

[jc456]

Most Damning Evidence Yet of FISA Abuse by the FBI | RealClearPolitics

Only thing this article says is the FBI had concerns about the main evidence used to support the warrant. But fast-forward to today, we've found much of whats in that dossier turned up true. So effectively this is like "the issue is NOT that we were colluding with Russia, the issue is that YOU found out!"
Additionally, just look at John F Solomon... repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals.

name one thing from the dossier proven. I'll wait.

• Cohen played a "key role" in the Trump–Russia relationship by maintaining a "covert relationship with Russia", arranging cover-ups and "deniable cash payments", and that his role had grown after Manafort had left the campaign. (Dossier, pp. 18, 30, 32, 34–35)
  
  
• "COHEN now was heavily engaged in a cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of TRUMP's relationship with Russia being exposed." (Dossier, p. 32)

you should look up the word covert. LOL. Trump was doing business in Russia. We do that as part of globalization laws. Cohen was his lawyer. Ever buy a house? you should have a lawyer. just in case you didn't know. And again, look up what covert means. and then you can tell me how trump was having a covert relationship.
bullet two: huh? wtf are you talking about and how is that on the dossier exactly?

 

[jc456]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

What a dope and a liar.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

It was not used as justification and it was not used to "spy" on Trump, dope.

sure it was. if it wasn't, we'd see the warrant.

 

[jc456]

QUOTE="Crepitus, post: 21333831, member: 69759"]

Where was The Hill wrong?

They were dead on.

Yeah... Nope.

Yet you refuse to point out where The Hill is wrong.

Which makes you a pathetic partisan liar.

For starters, it's an Op/Ed by a conservative, not a news article. Second, it's just a re-hash of crap the conservatives have been pushing for months to keep.their kinds offa the real stuff.

Newsflash: Papers only allow editorials they agree with.

Not true, well not true for non-rwnj sites at least.[/QUOTE]
^^^^^^^STUPID^^^^^^^^

can't get any more stupid than your post here.

 

[jc456]

Actually, much has already been done, firings, forced retirement, etc.

Yeah, nope.

Where was The Hill wrong?

They were dead on.

Yeah... Nope.

LOL you just proved you’re a clueless hack yet again.

Wrong again kid. You gullible fools are allowing yourselves to be led around by the nose as usual.

no, I think he was spot on, you're a clueless hack.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Where was The Hill wrong?

They were dead on.

Yeah... Nope.

Yet you refuse to point out where The Hill is wrong.

Which makes you a pathetic partisan liar.

For starters, it's an Op/Ed by a conservative, not a news article. Second, it's just a re-hash of crap the conservatives have been pushing for months to keep.their kinds offa the real stuff.

Newsflash: Papers only allow editorials they agree with.

Not true, well not true for non-rwnj sites at least.

Oh? How many columns has any newspaper given you?

 

[koshergrl]

Even the Hill is finally taking notice.

As more of the secret evidence used to justify the Russia probe becomes public, an increasingly dark portrait of the FBI’s conduct emerges.

The bureau, under a Democratic-controlled Justice Department, sought a warrant to spy on the duly nominated GOP candidate for president in the final weeks of the 2016 election, based on evidence that was generated under a contract paid by his political opponent.

That evidence, the Steele dossier, was not fully vetted by the bureau and was deemed unverified months after the warrant was issued.

At least one news article was used in the FISA warrant to bolster the dossier as independent corroboration when, it fact, it was traced to a news organization that had been in contact with Steele, creating a high likelihood it was circular-intelligence reporting.

And the entire warrant, the FBI’s own text message shows, was being rushed to approval by two agents who hated Trump and stated in their own texts that they wanted to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

If ever there were grounds to investigate the investigators, these facts provide the justification.

FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet

Eliminate the fbi and all the other crap agencies. They're nothing but goons.

At the beginning of Trump's presidency I predicted that while he's fighting to imprison the criminals that have infested our government, he would quietly fail to back fill positions at every level.

That's exactly what he's doing now.

Trump's slow-motion staff 'shakeup' stunts 2019 planning