Pedro de San Patricio
Gold Member
I'm going to make a few assumptions here. The first is that Hillary is untouchable. There is literally nothing she could say or do that could cost her the nomination. Her supporters have proven themselves ready and eager to defend her innocence even after she lies herself into a corner and finally has to admit her guilt. The second is that the Democratic nominee - Hillary - will win in 2016. They've already got it on lock between the shoddy opposition, their electoral head start, and their brilliant registration of countless illegal immigrants, convicted felons, and dead bodies as solid blue voters. The third is that, if the Republican candidate somehow manages to pull a win out of his ass despite his debilitating stupidity and the countless advantages of the opposition, the Democratic candidate - Hillary - will still be giving her inauguration speech in 2017 (just like Bush did after Gore's victory in 2000). The fourth is that the average Democratic rank and file member here would agree with me and be okay with each of these points.
Now, my question is: After the coming regime change, will the problems she is going to inherit still be Bush's fault, or will we finally be allowed to acknowledge at least part of Obama's role in them? More specifically, will the news media be allowed to imply that he's in any way responsible for any of the negative impacts of his actions while in office?
Now, my question is: After the coming regime change, will the problems she is going to inherit still be Bush's fault, or will we finally be allowed to acknowledge at least part of Obama's role in them? More specifically, will the news media be allowed to imply that he's in any way responsible for any of the negative impacts of his actions while in office?