When do republicans stop talking about 1860 and face what they are now?

If that’s the case your better left to disseminate your grievances to your fellow blacks; rather than begging, and imploring white people to see things your way. Unless of course you “turn white”...

I'm not begging, that's where you got it wrong. Whites will either change or white America as you know it will be destroyed. That's how God works.
Uh huh... So now you expect god to fix your problems... lol!

We aren't the ones with the problem.
Wouldn’t know it from your posting history....

I think you might want to pay attention to your history nut case.
Funny thing that... I know mine. Posting, and otherwise. Too bad for you, that you can’t say the same...
 
Todays republican party is the one pushing voter suppression.
Bullshit.

Any black who votes Democrat is voting for the party that fought against their right to vote. They're idiots.

If this was 1860 you'd have a valid point.
The point is still valid. A Democrat likely owned you ancestors. And Democrats are still using the police to oppress blacks in poor neighborhoods all over the country.

Most like a southerner. Get over it, we know the southern Dems are now the GOP and the Cons.
Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that ridiculous conclusion, jackass?

Not if you call me a jackass. Talk nice to me and I might.
 
Last edited:
I'm not begging, that's where you got it wrong. Whites will either change or white America as you know it will be destroyed. That's how God works.
Uh huh... So now you expect god to fix your problems... lol!

We aren't the ones with the problem.
Wouldn’t know it from your posting history....

I think you might want to pay attention to your history nut case.
Funny thing that... I know mine. Posting, and otherwise. Too bad for you, that you can’t say the same...

I know my posting history. As for the other, I know it far better than you.
 
Uh huh... So now you expect god to fix your problems... lol!

We aren't the ones with the problem.
Wouldn’t know it from your posting history....

I think you might want to pay attention to your history nut case.
Funny thing that... I know mine. Posting, and otherwise. Too bad for you, that you can’t say the same...

I know my posting history. As for the other, I know it far better than you.
Sure you do. Sure you do...
 
Republicans keep talking about the Democratic party of 150 years ago. Funny how 150 years ago only counts when white republicans try lying to blacks. When do republicans stop talking about 1860 and face what they are now?

Report: GOP official resigns after calling kneeling NFL players 'baboons'



Published on Sep 2, 2018-notice the date republicans.
Democrats bought and sold blacks. The Republican party was formed to end that.


Time and time again this comes up, the same people that love and honor the Confederate flag were Southern.
They didn't want to work so had slaves.


You reasoning makes no sense.

None of hte people today, who like to honor the Confederate Flag, own slaves.


Try to be less cra cra.


They would if they could.



Support that shit, or apologize.
 
We aren't the ones with the problem.
Wouldn’t know it from your posting history....

I think you might want to pay attention to your history nut case.
Funny thing that... I know mine. Posting, and otherwise. Too bad for you, that you can’t say the same...

I know my posting history. As for the other, I know it far better than you.
Sure you do. Sure you do...

I know I do.
 
Wouldn’t know it from your posting history....

I think you might want to pay attention to your history nut case.
Funny thing that... I know mine. Posting, and otherwise. Too bad for you, that you can’t say the same...

I know my posting history. As for the other, I know it far better than you.
Sure you do. Sure you do...

I know I do.
You think you “know” all kinds of things. Unfortunately for you “knowing” something, and “believing something; are two totally different things...
 
No, it was not.
Oh. Was segregation in public accommodation not still legislated before 1964?

You're right, and that infamous racist troll on here was getting their diapers changed.

Who was it that passed all those civil rights acts?

Republican%20Civil%20Rights%20Accomplishments-L.jpg
 
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954),[1] was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional.
Yet reading gives me to understand the public school system is profoundly segregated to this day. No?

Very true. Because bussing failed dramatically.

Do you support allowing parents to send their children to the school of their choice? How about vouchers? I presume you also support vouchers allowing low income households to send their children to private schools.
 
Republicans keep talking about the Democratic party of 150 years ago. Funny how 150 years ago only counts when white republicans try lying to blacks. When do republicans stop talking about 1860 and face what they are now?

Report: GOP official resigns after calling kneeling NFL players 'baboons'



Published on Sep 2, 2018-notice the date republicans.


Never. The 2420 presidential election run up will feature essays about Chappaquiddick.
 
I think you might want to pay attention to your history nut case.
Funny thing that... I know mine. Posting, and otherwise. Too bad for you, that you can’t say the same...

I know my posting history. As for the other, I know it far better than you.
Sure you do. Sure you do...

I know I do.
You think you “know” all kinds of things. Unfortunately for you “knowing” something, and “believing something; are two totally different things...

You believe, I know. And can show.
 
No, it was not.
Oh. Was segregation in public accommodation not still legislated before 1964?

You're right, and that infamous racist troll on here was getting their diapers changed.

Who was it that passed all those civil rights acts?

Republican%20Civil%20Rights%20Accomplishments-L.jpg

Today's republicans are against things created out of the civil rights movement like equal opportunity, affirmative action, fair housing etc. If republicans were all so much for racial equality they would not be opposing these measures. You just don't get it.
 
Republicans keep talking about the Democratic party of 150 years ago. Funny how 150 years ago only counts when white republicans try lying to blacks. When do republicans stop talking about 1860 and face what they are now?

Report: GOP official resigns after calling kneeling NFL players 'baboons'



Published on Sep 2, 2018-notice the date republicans.



Alright, this woman is clearly a racist and said some pretty hurtful things, but your trying to say this is what the Republican Party is? Sure CNN is trying to link her to Trump, well fine then, I can show you a video with a lot more than one woman. A video that shows people who voted for Obama and Hillary in essence, the Face of the Democrat party. this is who you are as a political party. Can you all face it? These are the people that the Democrat party represent.



Yes, that is what the republican party is. I'm not trying to say anything. She was a republican party official. Not some random face in the crowd. I'm in here with 90 percent republicans reading racist crap that I would have read in the 1700's and1800's and you want to make claims about socialists.

You don't even know what socialism really is. You don't know that we have socialist programs in the US right now. You've listened to a bunch of mentally handicapped right wing college dropouts tell you what socialism is.



Your trying to say this woman represents that face of the Republican party, just like you guys have said Neo -Nazis and KKK represent the Republican party because they voted for Trump. I'm saying, those people in the video represent your party just as Antifa does. They are the radical wing of the Democrats. They voted for Hillary just as White Supremist are a Radiacal wing of the Republicans and voted for Trump. You cant have it one way and not the other.
Basically what I'm saying is that racist woman in no way represents most of Republicans but your just looking to find the worst examples.


She is a republican party official. Not just a voter. The president and leader of the republican party is a racist. I don't have to look for anything. I'm in here reading 1800's style white racism from the majority of you republicans but you want to tell me how this lady doesn't represent most republicans. Antifa stands for anti fascist. So if you want to compare people who fight fascism as the same as fascists you need to think about your mental state.
 
Today's republicans are against things created out of the civil rights movement like equal opportunity, affirmative action, fair housing etc. If republicans were all so much for racial equality they would not be opposing these measures. You just don't get it.

Equal rights and affirmative action is an oxymoron. You, or your ilk, if you really exist, don't want equal opportunity, you want an unwarranted step-up. You're the one pushing against equal opportunity.

Fair housing is no longer an issue.

You're a failure looking for someone to blame, as such, you're nothing but a troll.

Statically, only about seventeen percent of white Americans have little or no automatic preference for whites or blacks. Only twelve percent show a slight to strong preference of blacks to whites. This is part of the results and explained in the test. It is free and you can choose to register or not. It’s fun, but I have also seen people go off the handle which is why it comes with a warning.

It’s NATURAL to discriminate and be prejudiced; almost exclusively we all grew up with people like very much like ourselves. It is natural to trust those people more than people who are not like us. Obviously, we also pick up racist attitudes and beliefs from our parents too. We discriminate and use prejudice every day. There is nothing wrong with those feelings. It is what we learn and what is in someone’s heart, and what we DO with those feelings that matter.

If you are curious about yourself, take this test. It is NOT based on questions, which you could answer the way you THINK you should. Actually, it is fun. You can choose from a number of different tests but they only take about 15 minutes.

This web site presents a method that demonstrates the conscious-unconscious divergences much more convincingly than has been possible with previous methods. This new method is called the Implicit Association Test or IAT for short.

WARNING!

It does carry this disclaimer:
I am aware of the possibility of encountering interpretations of my IAT test performance with which I may not agree. Knowing this, I wish to proceed.

Project Implicit

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

Come on, no guts no glory!
 
Last edited:
No, it was not.
Oh. Was segregation in public accommodation not still legislated before 1964?

You're right, and that infamous racist troll on here was getting their diapers changed.

Who was it that passed all those civil rights acts?

Republican%20Civil%20Rights%20Accomplishments-L.jpg

Today's republicans are against things created out of the civil rights movement like equal opportunity, affirmative action, fair housing etc. If republicans were all so much for racial equality they would not be opposing these measures. You just don't get it.
Affirmative action, and equal opportunity, are opposing practices... Which proves my point. You know nothing...
 
Affirmative action, and equal opportunity, are opposing practices... Which proves my point. You know nothing...

I take it that English is a second language for you.

Try looking up the word oxymoron.

Donald%20Duck-S.gif
An oxymoron applies only to a single item, or practice whose name components conflict with each other. As such it isn't properly used when comparing to separate things... How's your English now Professor?
shakes-head-gif-22.gif

Probably best to keep your nose in your own pint in the future. You can avoid further embarrassment much easier that way...
Pro Tip: Better, and appropriate word choices exist for what you were trying to say. "Hypocritcal" being the obvious choice. But "duplicitous" would be even better. Besides it's more fun to say...
One last thing... Written English has puntuations, such as commas for a reason. Feel free to use them.
 
Last edited:
No, it was not.
Oh. Was segregation in public accommodation not still legislated before 1964?

You're right, and that infamous racist troll on here was getting their diapers changed.

Who was it that passed all those civil rights acts?

Republican%20Civil%20Rights%20Accomplishments-L.jpg

Today's republicans are against things created out of the civil rights movement like equal opportunity, affirmative action, fair housing etc. If republicans were all so much for racial equality they would not be opposing these measures. You just don't get it.


Crazy talk. But thanks for telling us what we think.
 
Affirmative action, and equal opportunity, are opposing practices... Which proves my point. You know nothing...

I take it that English is a second language for you.

Try looking up the word oxymoron.

Donald%20Duck-S.gif
An oxymoron applies only to a single item, or practice whose name components conflict with each other. As such it isn't properly used when comparing to separate things... How's your English now Professor?
View attachment 214720
Probably best to keep your nose in your own pint in the future. You can avoid further embarrassment much easier that way...
Pro Tip: Better, and appropriate word choices exist for what you were trying to say. "Hypocritcal" being the obvious choice. But "duplicitous" would be even better. Besides it's more fun to say...
One last thing... Written English has puntuations, such as commas for a reason. Feel free to use them.
Edit: “Punctuations”. Don’t type and drive...
 

Forum List

Back
Top