Zona
A guy in ariZONA
- Thread starter
- #41
Dang... Here is another exhibit showing the left's insanity.
First, you have no legal justification to delay Brown's seating if he wins. Franken was delayed because he didn't win and stole that election. [/COLOR][/COLOR] Link? Hence legal justification galore to delay it.
Second, the second Brown is elected, Kirk is no longer a Senator. He doesn't need to be certified under Mass. State law. Therefore, the left will no longer have 60 votes. Even if you somehow managed to delay his seating.
Third, Lieberman has absolutely nothing to do with this election. Id love to hear your reasoning on getting rid of him. Especially since you need him to pass this bill too.
Finally, unless the house passes the Senate bill, which they wont. You cant get this passed if Brown wins.
Because if we lost, we wouldn't have the 60 seats and wont need liebermann. You can have him and good riddance. Brown winning will speed up this bill passing and get rid of liebermann. Still don't get it?
Like I said, we really don't have to delay Browns seat really, there are a few ways to get this bill passed. If there is a close election, what exactly makes you think the same questions wont be asked like the Frankin election. (By the way, congrats Sen. Frankin).
Go Brown!
Rep. Weiner: Health Care "Dead" If Scott Brown Wins
RealClearPolitics - Video - Rep. Weiner: Health Care "Dead" If Scott Brown Wins
Suck on that, Autozona...
I guesss you never thought he said that to get the dems out and voting in ma? LOL