When a US Marine forced 3 Israeli tanks to stop!

A MARINE, PISTOL DRAWN, STOPS 3 ISRAELI TANKS
Wow. Talk about news I never heard about! Interesting stuff.
Fog of War.

“The Israeli statement said the three tanks were patrolling in an area that had been agreed upon by the Israeli forces and the Marines after an ambush last Sunday in which an Israeli soldier was killed. It said: ''After completion of the patrol, a U.S. Marine officer approached the Israeli unit and claimed that it should not be in this area. The Israeli commander explained that he was operating in the territory previously agreed upon and left.''

In a statement this evening, the embassy said the Marine captain had told the Israeli tank commander that he was not familiar with details of the agreement on a demarcation line. The embassy asserted that the Marine officer had failed to follow communications procedures intended to prevent misunderstandings and that the Marines had failed to take part in joint reconnaissance to set demarcation lines between American and Israeli areas of operations.”
 
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.

you are right----there has been a genocide going on in Lebanon for
more than 80 years and counting-----Muslims have DECIDED that
MARONITES do not belong there------the Lebanese jews all fled.
Now Iran wants that land and plugged one of their most vile terrorist
pigs into that land------NUSKHARAHALLAH. It is an ongoing tragedy
in a beautiful land

That is miniscule compared to the genocide committed by Jews in the creation of Israel and the ongoing occupation and oppression for six decades after.

Israel has an interest in provoking and instigating chaos in Lebanon.

I am intrigued-----what people were subjected to genocide by jews in the creation of Israel?-----and upon whom is there an ongoing
"oppression"? Try to consider the meaning of the words that you employ
 
The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.
???!!
pray tell, what country are you yakking about?

The "yakking" in your head is not my voice.
a very simple question--what is the country you are talking about?
you give NO answer = your claim is BULLSHIT

I don't want to be responsible for your suicide.
 
The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.

you are right----there has been a genocide going on in Lebanon for
more than 80 years and counting-----Muslims have DECIDED that
MARONITES do not belong there------the Lebanese jews all fled.
Now Iran wants that land and plugged one of their most vile terrorist
pigs into that land------NUSKHARAHALLAH. It is an ongoing tragedy
in a beautiful land

That is miniscule compared to the genocide committed by Jews in the creation of Israel and the ongoing occupation and oppression for six decades after.

Israel has an interest in provoking and instigating chaos in Lebanon.

I am intrigued-----what people were subjected to genocide by jews in the creation of Israel?-----and upon whom is there an ongoing
"oppression"? Try to consider the meaning of the words that you employ

Palestinians.
 
A MARINE, PISTOL DRAWN, STOPS 3 ISRAELI TANKS
Wow. Talk about news I never heard about! Interesting stuff.

An article from 1983?

I couldn't find any from 1389 which would be more to your taste.

When hundred of Jews in Prague were slaughtered in their homes by their xtian neighbors celebrating Easter?

You have finally mastered Google.

Pick any random date in European History ... it's a pretty good bet Jews were being killed. It's the one thing all Europeans can agree on.
 
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.

you are right----there has been a genocide going on in Lebanon for
more than 80 years and counting-----Muslims have DECIDED that
MARONITES do not belong there------the Lebanese jews all fled.
Now Iran wants that land and plugged one of their most vile terrorist
pigs into that land------NUSKHARAHALLAH. It is an ongoing tragedy
in a beautiful land

That is miniscule compared to the genocide committed by Jews in the creation of Israel and the ongoing occupation and oppression for six decades after.

Israel has an interest in provoking and instigating chaos in Lebanon.

I am intrigued-----what people were subjected to genocide by jews in the creation of Israel?-----and upon whom is there an ongoing
"oppression"? Try to consider the meaning of the words that you employ

Palestinians.

which "Palestinians"? the Jews who lived in Palestine and have been labeled "Palestinians" from approximately 100 AD until some time in the 1960s when SUDDENY a bunch of muslims decided to call themselves "PALESTINIANS" My hubby is a "Palestinian" according to his passport and government papers issued by the British
in the 1940s. He is a jew who was born in a muslim shit hole from which his parents managed to escape in the 1940s. As a JEW he was called a PALESTINIAN---when they got to the Palestine mandate. Had he been a muslim-----his papers would have described him as
ARAB---------you want to play semantics along with the rest of your fellow islamo Nazi dogs? It is true that lots of his community was murdered by your fellow islamo Nazi dogs-----but he survived much to your regret. As to the filth that NOW claim to be Palestinians-----their numbers have been increasing-----not decreasing. Do you know the definition of GENOCIDE?
 
.....I'm still waiting for Denizen to name the countries that the US has committed genocide on
????

??????

????
 
.....I'm still waiting for Denizen to name the countries that the US has committed genocide on
????

??????

????

The USA.
wrong
1. the NAs were not a country
2.
self defense is not genocide
3.
When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.
the NAs tortured/warred on/displaced/etc whites and other NAs
the USA did not take over a country
the USA could not have taken over the USA in 1800s as the USA was the USA by then!!
you argument is very ridiculous
 
.....I'm still waiting for Denizen to name the countries that the US has committed genocide on
????

??????

????

The USA.
wrong
1. the NAs were not a country
2.
self defense is not genocide
3.
When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.
the NAs tortured/warred on/displaced/etc whites and other NAs
the USA did not take over a country
the USA could not have taken over the USA in 1800s as the USA was the USA by then!!
you argument is very ridiculous

Man up and confess the crimes of your ancestors:

Atrocities Against Native Americans - United to End Genocide

... U.S. History of Atrocities
After the American Revolution, many Native American lives were already lost to disease and displacement. In 1830, the federal Indian Removal Act called for the removal of the ‘Five Civilized Tribes’ – the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole. Between 1830 and 1838, federal officials working on behalf of white cotton growers forced nearly 100,000 Indians out of their homeland. The dangerous journey from the southern states to “Indian Territory” in current Oklahoma is referred to as the Trail of Tears in which 4,000 Cherokee people died of cold, hunger, and disease.
As the United States expanded westward, violent conflicts over territory multiplied.

In 1784, one British traveler noted:
“White Americans have the most rancorous antipathy to the whole race of Indians; and nothing is more common than to hear them talk of extirpating them totally from the face of the earth, men, women, and children.” ...
 
.....I'm still waiting for Denizen to name the countries that the US has committed genocide on
????

??????

????

The USA.
wrong
1. the NAs were not a country
2.
self defense is not genocide
3.
When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.
the NAs tortured/warred on/displaced/etc whites and other NAs
the USA did not take over a country
the USA could not have taken over the USA in 1800s as the USA was the USA by then!!
you argument is very ridiculous

Man up and confess the crimes of your ancestors:

Atrocities Against Native Americans - United to End Genocide

... U.S. History of Atrocities
After the American Revolution, many Native American lives were already lost to disease and displacement. In 1830, the federal Indian Removal Act called for the removal of the ‘Five Civilized Tribes’ – the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole. Between 1830 and 1838, federal officials working on behalf of white cotton growers forced nearly 100,000 Indians out of their homeland. The dangerous journey from the southern states to “Indian Territory” in current Oklahoma is referred to as the Trail of Tears in which 4,000 Cherokee people died of cold, hunger, and disease.
As the United States expanded westward, violent conflicts over territory multiplied.

In 1784, one British traveler noted:
“White Americans have the most rancorous antipathy to the whole race of Indians; and nothing is more common than to hear them talk of extirpating them totally from the face of the earth, men, women, and children.” ...
the NAs did the SAME!!
...and they TORTURED--which was not a policy/culture of the whites like it was for the NAs--even the NA children participated in the TORTURE
 
.....I'm still waiting for Denizen to name the countries that the US has committed genocide on
????

??????

????

The USA.
wrong
1. the NAs were not a country
2.
self defense is not genocide
3.
When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.
the NAs tortured/warred on/displaced/etc whites and other NAs
the USA did not take over a country
the USA could not have taken over the USA in 1800s as the USA was the USA by then!!
you argument is very ridiculous

Man up and confess the crimes of your ancestors:

Atrocities Against Native Americans - United to End Genocide

... U.S. History of Atrocities
After the American Revolution, many Native American lives were already lost to disease and displacement. In 1830, the federal Indian Removal Act called for the removal of the ‘Five Civilized Tribes’ – the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole. Between 1830 and 1838, federal officials working on behalf of white cotton growers forced nearly 100,000 Indians out of their homeland. The dangerous journey from the southern states to “Indian Territory” in current Oklahoma is referred to as the Trail of Tears in which 4,000 Cherokee people died of cold, hunger, and disease.
As the United States expanded westward, violent conflicts over territory multiplied.

In 1784, one British traveler noted:
“White Americans have the most rancorous antipathy to the whole race of Indians; and nothing is more common than to hear them talk of extirpating them totally from the face of the earth, men, women, and children.” ...
the NAs did the SAME!!
...and they TORTURED--which was not a policy/culture of the whites like it was for the NAs--even the NA children participated in the TORTURE

Whites created the scalping culture which the Indians later adopted.

White societies paid money for Indian scalps, including those of Indian children.

Whites f your ilk killed Indian children by bashing their heads against the ground.
 
.....I'm still waiting for Denizen to name the countries that the US has committed genocide on
????

??????

????

The USA.
wrong
1. the NAs were not a country
2.
self defense is not genocide
3.
When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.
the NAs tortured/warred on/displaced/etc whites and other NAs
the USA did not take over a country
the USA could not have taken over the USA in 1800s as the USA was the USA by then!!
you argument is very ridiculous

Man up and confess the crimes of your ancestors:

Atrocities Against Native Americans - United to End Genocide

... U.S. History of Atrocities
After the American Revolution, many Native American lives were already lost to disease and displacement. In 1830, the federal Indian Removal Act called for the removal of the ‘Five Civilized Tribes’ – the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole. Between 1830 and 1838, federal officials working on behalf of white cotton growers forced nearly 100,000 Indians out of their homeland. The dangerous journey from the southern states to “Indian Territory” in current Oklahoma is referred to as the Trail of Tears in which 4,000 Cherokee people died of cold, hunger, and disease.
As the United States expanded westward, violent conflicts over territory multiplied.

In 1784, one British traveler noted:
“White Americans have the most rancorous antipathy to the whole race of Indians; and nothing is more common than to hear them talk of extirpating them totally from the face of the earth, men, women, and children.” ...
the NAs did the SAME!!
...and they TORTURED--which was not a policy/culture of the whites like it was for the NAs--even the NA children participated in the TORTURE

Whites created the scalping culture which the Indians later adopted.

White societies paid money for Indian scalps, including those of Indian children.

Whites f your ilk killed Indian children by bashing their heads against the ground.
that does not disprove anything I said
 
I am still wondering why the NON-EVENT---of US marines and
Israelis in verbal dispute as to WHO SHOULD SCOUT AROUND
WHERE --------came be NEWS----or just what is its significance
to the OP
 
I am still wondering why the NON-EVENT---of US marines and
Israelis in verbal dispute as to WHO SHOULD SCOUT AROUND
WHERE --------came be NEWS----or just what is its significance
to the OP

It was an act of bravery. Johnson had a bigger Johnson than the Israelis.
 

Forum List

Back
Top