When a US Marine forced 3 Israeli tanks to stop!

I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
307 people killed is "funny" to someone?


where did you see "funny"?
 
I’m sure America gave Israel a few extra billion dollars as recompense for our disobedience

I am sure that you are as desperate as is odious
Desperate for what? Without Israel, America is nothing.

desperate to dig around to find some non-event or non-situation to
create a libel against Israel. ------when all is lost, get into DA MONEEEEEEEEEEEE. I am old-----but learned all I need to know
about islamo-Nazi propaganda by age 12. I was an avid reader
back then. I read superman comics too
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also
Yes, and Eisenhower, a military man, put them up on the heights overlooking Beirut. Reagan put them in about the most dangerous position, and they got burned for it.
So, Granada got 'liberated'.


Reagan picked the site? I find that hard to believe. Why didn't any of the military men involved, say something about it?


ANd why the fuck didnt' anyone give the guards bullets for their guns!?
 
I’m sure America gave Israel a few extra billion dollars as recompense for our disobedience

I am sure that you are as desperate as is odious
Desperate for what? Without Israel, America is nothing.

desperate to dig around to find some non-event or non-situation to
create a libel against Israel. ------when all is lost, get into DA MONEEEEEEEEEEEE. I am old-----but learned all I need to know
about islamo-Nazi propaganda by age 12. I was an avid reader
back then. I read superman comics too
One does not need to be desperate or to dig around to find that stuff. I just find it interesting to see Americans siding against a marine in favor of Israel.
 
I’m sure America gave Israel a few extra billion dollars as recompense for our disobedience

I am sure that you are as desperate as is odious
Desperate for what? Without Israel, America is nothing.

desperate to dig around to find some non-event or non-situation to
create a libel against Israel. ------when all is lost, get into DA MONEEEEEEEEEEEE. I am old-----but learned all I need to know
about islamo-Nazi propaganda by age 12. I was an avid reader
back then. I read superman comics too
One does not need to be desperate or to dig around to find that stuff. I just find it interesting to see Americans siding against a marine in favor of Israel.

no desperation at all------it's all written out for you. I read similar stuff
circa 1960----that BACK then was already 50 years old. Where do
you see americans "siding" against a marine "in favor of Israel"?
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also
Yes, and Eisenhower, a military man, put them up on the heights overlooking Beirut. Reagan put them in about the most dangerous position, and they got burned for it.
So, Granada got 'liberated'.


Reagan picked the site? I find that hard to believe. Why didn't any of the military men involved, say something about it?


ANd why the fuck didnt' anyone give the guards bullets for their guns!?
The 'reason' is related to why Nancy was always on top.
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also
Yes, and Eisenhower, a military man, put them up on the heights overlooking Beirut. Reagan put them in about the most dangerous position, and they got burned for it.
So, Granada got 'liberated'.


Reagan picked the site? I find that hard to believe. Why didn't any of the military men involved, say something about it?


ANd why the fuck didnt' anyone give the guards bullets for their guns!?
The 'reason' is related to why Nancy was always on top.


The reason has to do with a fucked up military that Reagan inherited.
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
 
Israel said it never happened. Did anybody at the Times bother to interview Capt. Johnson or the Israeli tank crew before a digitalized version of the story was reprinted?

it is not clear to me why that non event was in the news at all

It was published to dispel your ignorance.

ignorance of what?

Real news, facts, and truth.

the "REAL FACT" that military officers from two different
countries had a disagreement as to which "side" had a right or
reason to be on which field of conflict? -------Ya gotta be kiddin'
You idiots consider that a NEWS WORTHY THINGY?.

You are evidently more interested in their bowel movements.
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.
 
it is not clear to me why that non event was in the news at all

It was published to dispel your ignorance.

ignorance of what?

Real news, facts, and truth.

the "REAL FACT" that military officers from two different
countries had a disagreement as to which "side" had a right or
reason to be on which field of conflict? -------Ya gotta be kiddin'
You idiots consider that a NEWS WORTHY THINGY?.

You are evidently more interested in their bowel movements.

kinda funny-----I am not a gastroenterologist-----but one of my brothers is
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.

you are right----there has been a genocide going on in Lebanon for
more than 80 years and counting-----Muslims have DECIDED that
MARONITES do not belong there------the Lebanese jews all fled.
Now Iran wants that land and plugged one of their most vile terrorist
pigs into that land------NUSKHARAHALLAH. It is an ongoing tragedy
in a beautiful land
 
I remember that
I was in the USMC at the time
sounds like something other Marines I know would do--especially my co-worker
he took no shit from anyone
he would get to the point/problem fast--and fix it
maybe too impulsive, but he would kick some a$$

....I remember-- distinctly/clearly when Reagan said they would send the Marines there---for peacekeeping
...I immediately thought--''this is not good'''
..you don't use a military force in a fked up area like that, and not give them free fire orders
..that place had more than just the Pals fighting the Israelis....
...there were all kinds of conflicts with so many different groups

and--I was right
the USMC is trained more for going in and kicking A$$--not sitting around, waiting for ''trouble''--where they don't have weapons free orders
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.
???!!
pray tell, what country are you yakking about?
 
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.

you are right----there has been a genocide going on in Lebanon for
more than 80 years and counting-----Muslims have DECIDED that
MARONITES do not belong there------the Lebanese jews all fled.
Now Iran wants that land and plugged one of their most vile terrorist
pigs into that land------NUSKHARAHALLAH. It is an ongoing tragedy
in a beautiful land

That is miniscule compared to the genocide committed by Jews in the creation of Israel and the ongoing occupation and oppression for six decades after.

Israel has an interest in provoking and instigating chaos in Lebanon.
 
One of Reagan's catastrophic errors.
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.
???!!
pray tell, what country are you yakking about?

The "yakking" in your head is not my voice.
 
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.
???!!
pray tell, what country are you yakking about?

The "yakking" in your head is not my voice.
I see you are full of shit--as you don't even name the country !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
the world should've been helping Israel eradicate the Pals
but the US should not have gone in
the USMC was there in 1958 also

The USA has not practiced genocide since the near extermination of the American Indian.
??
self defense is not genocide

When you kill people to take over their country that's not self-defense. Its genocide.

You are evidently sensitive about the genocide issue.
???!!
pray tell, what country are you yakking about?

The "yakking" in your head is not my voice.
a very simple question--what is the country you are talking about?
you give NO answer = your claim is BULLSHIT
 

Forum List

Back
Top