What's next for O'Reilly?

[Wry Catcher]

One very obvious reason for why "Moral Majority" went bye-bye as did "The Big Tent" and "Country First" from the Conservative Republican's lexicon is their blatant dishonesty. Once again the Conservative Movement exposes the once self named "Traditional Values Coalition" as it truly is, a tool for the power elite to gain power from biddable voters.

What does this have to do with O'Reilly? The Alt. Right Media which feeds the biddable voters may soon make offers for this misogynist pig to be their ace:

Bill O’Reilly: Conservative News Outlets Likely to Pounce Post-Fox News Ouster

Looking at the numbers of people who tune in to the real fake news - One America News Network & Newsmax for examples - it's obvious why Red State America is conservative; they listen/watch/read propaganda everyday and really believe such sources have Journalistic Integrity. These sources, as well as Limbaugh and other conservative radio broadcasters, have the credibility of the supermarket tabloids and one agenda above all, economic gain.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

A long and profitable career in the book business.

Maybe a "Killing Hillary" about the 2016 campaign.

 

[OldLady]

O’Reilly already has a “premium membership” plan on his website. Subscribers pay $4.95 per month for access to a newsletter, a message board, and the “O’Reilly Factor” archives. The site is rumored to have at least 20,000 paying subscribers, bringing in more than $1 million a year.

O’Reilly could launch a daily podcast or streaming show and substantially grow the premium subscriber base.

With relatively little effort, he could replace much of his lost earnings from Fox.

This is my guess. Eliminate the flack from advertisers.

 

[Corky]

What's next for O'Reilly?

He'll get his wiener cut off for grabbing the wrong woman.

 

[Wry Catcher]

A long and profitable career in the book business.

Maybe a "Killing Hillary" about the 2016 campaign.

Possibly, and I suspect conservative women will flock to his memoirs, unless of course he is indicted and convicted of a sexual assault (think Bill Cosby, hmmmm ... both are Bills too, but I digress) and cannot profit from writing a book after such a conviction.

 

[Wry Catcher]

O’Reilly already has a “premium membership” plan on his website. Subscribers pay $4.95 per month for access to a newsletter, a message board, and the “O’Reilly Factor” archives. The site is rumored to have at least 20,000 paying subscribers, bringing in more than $1 million a year.

O’Reilly could launch a daily podcast or streaming show and substantially grow the premium subscriber base.

With relatively little effort, he could replace much of his lost earnings from Fox.

This is my guess. Eliminate the flack from advertisers.

Very likely.

 

[miketx]

A long and profitable career in the book business.

Maybe a "Killing Hillary" about the 2016 campaign.

Possibly, and I suspect conservative women will flock to his memoirs, unless of course he is indicted and convicted of a sexual assault (think Bill Cosby, hmmmm ... both are Bills too, but I digress) and cannot profit from writing a book after such a conviction.

You are joke, by anyone's standards All you do is make up bullshit.

 

[Pogo]

He's gonna write a book for Sabra Foods called "Killing Falafel".

 

[Wry Catcher]

A long and profitable career in the book business.

Maybe a "Killing Hillary" about the 2016 campaign.

Possibly, and I suspect conservative women will flock to his memoirs, unless of course he is indicted and convicted of a sexual assault (think Bill Cosby, hmmmm ... both are Bills too, but I digress) and cannot profit from writing a book after such a conviction.

You are joke, by anyone's standards All you do is make up bullshit.

Thank you, your attack on my comments are the best evidence they succeed in their purpose.

 

[danielpalos]

What's next for O'Reilly?

He'll get his wiener cut off for grabbing the wrong woman.

He should ask women to "requite him" for the sake of "equal rights".

 

[Wry Catcher]

What's next for O'Reilly?

He'll get his wiener cut off for grabbing the wrong woman.

He should ask women to "requite him" for the sake of "equal rights".

Good idea, maybe we could ask Megan Anderson (MMA Champion) to requite O'Reilly? That would be really really fun to watch.

 

[Political Junky]

What's next? Hell likely.

 

[danielpalos]

What's next for O'Reilly?

He'll get his wiener cut off for grabbing the wrong woman.

He should ask women to "requite him" for the sake of "equal rights".

Good idea, maybe we could ask Megan Anderson (MMA Champion) to requite O'Reilly? That would be really really fun to watch.

You grab mine and I grab yours.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I'll hazard a guess at his own syndicated show on some network.

 

[blastoff]

Think he's a vindictive type so I'd look for a book telling his side of the story of his firing. Whether he's got stuff that'll clear his name or not I don't know, but I just can't imagine him not going down swinging.

Personally I'd bet he got what he deserved, but it will be interesting to hear what he's got to say whether a book or some other medium.

 

[MarcATL]

One very obvious reason for why "Moral Majority" went bye-bye as did "The Big Tent" and "Country First" from the Conservative Republican's lexicon is their blatant dishonesty. Once again the Conservative Movement exposes the once self named "Traditional Values Coalition" as it truly is, a tool for the power elite to gain power from biddable voters.

What does this have to do with O'Reilly? The Alt. Right Media which feeds the biddable voters may soon make offers for this misogynist pig to be their ace:

Bill O’Reilly: Conservative News Outlets Likely to Pounce Post-Fox News Ouster

Looking at the numbers of people who tune in to the real fake news - One America News Network & Newsmax for examples - it's obvious why Red State America is conservative; they listen/watch/read propaganda everyday and really believe such sources have Journalistic Integrity. These sources, as well as Limbaugh and other conservative radio broadcasters, have the credibility of the supermarket tabloids and one agenda above all, economic gain.

Here's where I have to differ with you my friend. These people don't believe these sources have journalistic integrity more than they believe that these sources "speak to them." They aren't looking for, or in no way interested in journalistic integrity. These people want to feel someone or some group is speaking to their issues and is promoting things they want to and like to hear/think. They then willingly falsely INTERPRET that as integrity, but they have no interest in integrity. That has been proved time and time again, because when they are given actual facts, even from these same sources that show they were wrong about previous propaganda issues, they still cling to their false narratives, like Obama's birth certificate and Benghazi for more recent examples.

They are willing and hapless tools and lemmings. The lot of them.

 

[MarcATL]

I'll hazard a guess at his own syndicated show on some network.

Will you be watching?

 

[MarcATL]

O’Reilly already has a “premium membership” plan on his website. Subscribers pay $4.95 per month for access to a newsletter, a message board, and the “O’Reilly Factor” archives. The site is rumored to have at least 20,000 paying subscribers, bringing in more than $1 million a year.

O’Reilly could launch a daily podcast or streaming show and substantially grow the premium subscriber base.

With relatively little effort, he could replace much of his lost earnings from Fox.

This is my guess. Eliminate the flack from advertisers.

So YOU'RE going to be a supporter?

 

[MarcATL]

Think he's a vindictive type so I'd look for a book telling his side of the story of his firing. Whether he's got stuff that'll clear his name or not I don't know, but I just can't imagine him not going down swinging.

Personally I'd bet he got what he deserved, but it will be interesting to hear what he's got to say whether a book or some other medium.

"Going down swinging" or "being wrong and strong." Which one of these do you think is more accurate here?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I see him registering as a Democrat and running against Trump in 2020