Rshermr
VIP Member
!So, the oil companies, in my opinion, have monopoly power which they utilize to make their profits very high.
That word monopoly, it doesn't mean what you think it means.
Really. I am certain of what monopoly, and monopoly power mean. Perhaps you are confused again.
And most voters, at this point, have swung to the understanding that global warming is real and a large problem.
View attachment 95410
As I stated. Here is Gallup's latest. Aces. You loose.
U.S. Concern About Global Warming at Eight-Year High
But here is another. Five aces? AND THE ABOVE IS A LINK.
Need more. These are 2016 charts, and the text is in the link also. Supports exactly what I said. But there are many more, but all say the same.
By the way, me boy, lying by chart is tacky. You have a chart with a single green line, undated, with no explanation and no link to the text. Very, very tacky. And it is, by the way, obviously very meaningless.
Maybe honesty and discussion are simply too hard for you.
I seldom say this, but in this case it is obvious. YOU LOOSE. Try again when you have valid data.
View attachment 95413
And most voters, at this point, have swung to the understanding that global warming is real and a large problem.
Your source showed 57% don't think it's a serious threat in their lifetime.
Looks like you have a way to go before you get to "most voters".
So, you disagree with what Gallup says. The chart says something slightly different in words from what you "mis" quoted. The chart was of serious threat to you (IE, those being polled). In other words, most think they will escape the problem. But they indicated on the other charts they believed it was a serious problem. So, the expectation of most, though certainly not cons, is that they will have concern for the human race, not just themselves. Being a con, you probably can not fathom that, but indications are that it is true. And it is true that the trend is upward,for the past year plus. And it is expected to continue,
Sorry, you global climate change deniers are.... what is the technical word? Oh yeah, you are SCREWED,
The biggest problem is obvious. If you read the Gallop article, you will understand. Er, probably not. Understand what thinking people see as obvious. People are getting more and more concerned at a rapid rate.
So, you disagree with what Gallup says.
I disagree with combining "Worry a great deal" and "Worry a fair amount".
Breaking them out is more useful.
Who cares what you disagree with. Gallup chose to add a second catagory. And, since they have a large number of professionals looking at the issue, my money is on them. What it is not on, as any rational person would know, is useing data over 2 years old instead of current data. We were, me boy, talking about 2016, which makes your chart of little value.
Funny thing is, if you put in the term gloval climate change poll, you would have found both. But there would be more of the 2016 polls, only one or so for 2014. Yet you picked the 2014 poll which better fitted your liking, with a lower percentage of those polled that thought CS was an issue. What a coincidence. Dipshit.
Sorry, you global climate change deniers are.... what is the technical word? Oh yeah, you are SCREWED,
Global climate change deniers? We were discussing global warming.
OK. Same issue. you can simply substitute warming, same issue for you. Different in that gw includes fewer variables.
Who cares what you disagree with
You do, otherwise you wouldn't have mentioned it. Well, you are wrong again. I care about what Gallup says, and know that you are, technically, full of shit.
Global climate change deniers? We were discussing global warming.
OK. Same issue.
Same issue? LOL!
That's why people don't take the fearmongering seriously anymore
Fearmongering? Is that what con trolls call the prediction of scientists? What I proved, using 2016 polling, is that people are taking the word of scientists more and more seriously. Only con talking points suggest otherwise.