TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 36,656
- 47,227
- 2,915
Do the Troglocrats need even more infamy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
I am quite well-versed in history, thank you.
It's you I think is funny.
You tards are the ones going against the will of the people!It's a beginning. What they really want is the Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence.
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
I am quite well-versed in history, thank you.
It's you I think is funny.
Yet it's the post that you mark as "funny" so apparently you're not as well-versed as you imagine.
And what kind of Democrats were they, liar by omission?In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
I am quite well-versed in history, thank you.
It's you I think is funny.
Yet it's the post that you mark as "funny" so apparently you're not as well-versed as you imagine.
Well versed enough to note that you omitted Democrat responsibility for the resurrection of the Klan, the surge in Jim Crow laws, the surge in lynchings and riots. What a funny guy you are.
And what kind of Democrats were theyIn the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
I am quite well-versed in history, thank you.
It's you I think is funny.
Yet it's the post that you mark as "funny" so apparently you're not as well-versed as you imagine.
Well versed enough to note that you omitted Democrat responsibility for the resurrection of the Klan, the surge in Jim Crow laws, the surge in lynchings and riots. What a funny guy you are.
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
I am quite well-versed in history, thank you.
It's you I think is funny.
Yet it's the post that you mark as "funny" so apparently you're not as well-versed as you imagine.
Well versed enough to note that you omitted Democrat responsibility for the resurrection of the Klan, the surge in Jim Crow laws, the surge in lynchings and riots. What a funny guy you are.
They are doing the same thing today in the hope of burying that history that is their albatross.
Removing a sportscaster because his name is Robert Lee? Oy vey ...
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
In the best case, attention to who put those monuments up, and why.
That being, the Lost Cause history revisionism, starring the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their fellow travellers, out to whitewash a sorry history by running around the country putting up statues, monuments and plaques in the most visible and official-looking places possible, as well as writing books and articles, producing movies and anything else they could come up with to rewrite that history into the collective culture.
You remember --- the same group that brought Thomas Dixon's "The Clansman" (1905), the revolutionary film made from it "Birth of a Nation" (1915), the resurrection of the Klan itself in response (1915), a surge in Jim Crow laws, a surge in lynchings, a surge in race riots --- and simultaneously it brought the statues and monuments being targeted (and, in some cases like the Liberty Place monument to a riot started by a white supremacist group of thugs, already removed by an embarrassed city). They are the propaganda devices of their time.
I call it The Golden Age of White Supremacy. That's when they date from, that's who put them there, and that's what they represent. The more awareness of that period of "lost" history --- the better.
Billy_Kinetta thinks it "funny" to be aware of one's history.
Isn't that eloquent.
I am quite well-versed in history, thank you.
It's you I think is funny.
Yet it's the post that you mark as "funny" so apparently you're not as well-versed as you imagine.
Well versed enough to note that you omitted Democrat responsibility for the resurrection of the Klan, the surge in Jim Crow laws, the surge in lynchings and riots. What a funny guy you are.
They are doing the same thing today in the hope of burying that history that is their albatross.
Removing a sportscaster because his name is Robert Lee? Oy vey ...