DrainBamage
Gold Member
- Dec 31, 2016
- 1,750
- 183
- 140
Well that sounds like a great idea, disregard the real data because someone on a message board with a chip on his shoulder says it's BS, and take his figures as gospel. No thanks.If you don't like the figures I came up with. look them up for yourself. Just be prepared for some bullshit. Because I wouldn't believe the government if they told me the sky was blue.
If you were looking for excuses instead of looking for work then you're not unemployed.1, there were no jobs. 2, I was too POOR to work!
This demonstrates that you have no idea how the number of jobs is calculated by BLS, which is a good example of reasons we roll our eyes at your amateur hour employment number calculations.Next, more BS! Net gains my ass. Not everybody who looks for work does so through the employment office. Where they "might" list those who are looking for work. And if any employer is required to contact the government every time somebody comes in to apply for a job, I've never heard about it. Neither have I or anybody I've heard of been required to contact the government and say "I stopped looking for work."
Math fail, "net" by it's very nature shows both sides of the story.Another thing about the "net gains" thing is that it paints an unrealistic picture. (Big surprise!) By showing only one side of the story.