What is the ideal Liberal world?

Kim Jong Ill

Akhmadinejaahd

Hugo Chavez

Ted Kennedy

Pol Pot

Fidel Castro

Charles Schumer

Hillary Clinton

Baroque O'Bama

Atilla D'Hun

Barbara Boxer

just to name a few.

Teddy, maybe, I don't know enough about him. Hillary, probably. The rest, no.
 
Actually it was a bi-partisan agreement with the leaders of congress at the president's urging to balance the budget. It sure pisses a lot of people off on this board that Bill Clinton was president when all of this occurred. I wonder why? See, Hillary would have made a horrible president. She doesn't even have the political fortitude of her husband!Clinton and G.O.P. Cheer Plan to Balance Budget - New York Times :eusa_whistle:
 
I am not even going to bother listing them, the list would be far to long. Suffice to say the entire Democrat leadership. Nancey, harry, Obama, Dean. Just to name a few.
 
liberals=
Barack Obama
Nancy Pelosi
Harry Reed
Russ Feingold
Teddy Kennedy
billary
Jimmy Carter
ALgore
John Kerry
Dennis Kasinich
Ruth Ginsberg
Steven Breyer
David Souter



the big daddy= FDR
the well from which all future liberals sprang
 
Last edited:
Actually it was a bi-partisan agreement with the leaders of congress at the president's urging to balance the budget. It sure pisses a lot of people off on this board that Bill Clinton was president when all of this occurred. I wonder why? See, Hillary would have made a horrible president. She doesn't even have the political fortitude of her husband!Clinton and G.O.P. Cheer Plan to Balance Budget - New York Times :eusa_whistle:

You are so clueless it is pathetic. Congress was taken over by 1996 by the Republicans. They forced Clinton to come to their positions, not the other way round retard. In 94 and 95 Republicans controlled the House and forced him as well to deal with them. Clinton did not want the budget as it ended up, he had no choice. Being a damn good politician he wisely chose to play along. He had no choice.
 
You are so clueless it is pathetic. Congress was taken over by 1996 by the Republicans. They forced Clinton to come to their positions, not the other way round retard. In 94 and 95 Republicans controlled the House and forced him as well to deal with them. Clinton did not want the budget as it ended up, he had no choice. Being a damn good politician he wisely chose to play along. He had no choice.

Revisionist Historians strike again. Most Americans are convinced the great economy and balanced budgets of the 90's were all Clinton's doing. No matter how many times we remind them that the conservative republicans in congress were the ones elected to balance the budget, and in fact the ones responsible for it.

As for the great economy, it was mainly the result of the Tech bubble, which we later found out was a false economy anyways, wholly unsustainable.
 
Kim Jong Ill, Akhmadinejaahd, Hugo Chavez, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, Atilla D'Hun
just to name a few.
Why do you incessantly post crap on this site that makes you look like a stupid idiot... seriously...explain how one of these people are liberal.. any one.. I am glad your name is Mr Right.. cause your comments only highlight the lack of intelligence that plagues your bretheren and has produced such a glorious leader as Gee Dubya...
 
Revisionist Historians strike again. Most Americans are convinced the great economy and balanced budgets of the 90's were all Clinton's doing. No matter how many times we remind them that the conservative republicans in congress were the ones elected to balance the budget, and in fact the ones responsible for it.

As for the great economy, it was mainly the result of the Tech bubble, which we later found out was a false economy anyways, wholly unsustainable.

MUCH CREDIT for the balanced budget of the Clinton years has to go to GEORGE BUSH SENIOR.

Remember he riased taxes and that cost him the re-election?

That man is seldom given credit for doing the right thing, given that he KNEW it would cost him the White House.

Would that his son had half as much sense or integrity.
 
Who called amagannakillyouall in Iran a liberal? Hardly. More like a far right Nationalist. In other words a Nazi

The left is closer to National Socialism.


confiscate guns, look out for your health, then decide who should live and die or who should be in the upper echelon of society.

Sounds pretty liberal to me.
 
The left is closer to National Socialism.


confiscate guns, look out for your health, then decide who should live and die or who should be in the upper echelon of society.

Sounds pretty liberal to me.

Well, you got the look out for your health part right. I guess you live in your own little world where everything wrong is the liberals fault. I suggest you turn off the talk radio for a few, take a deep breath, and remember that we are all Americans fighting for the exact same thing, freedom to be ourselves and live our lives.
 
Well, you got the look out for your health part right. I guess you live in your own little world where everything wrong is the liberals fault. I suggest you turn off the talk radio for a few, take a deep breath, and remember that we are all Americans fighting for the exact same thing, freedom to be ourselves and live our lives.

That would be why those on the left make as many ignorant , stupid comments about Bush as they do? Claiming he is a right wing Fundamentalist is a laugh riot. Yet you retards do it all the time.

What you REALLY mean is us low life right wing idiots should keep our mouths shut and stop voting so you left wing god's gift to mankind intelligent saviors can save us all.
 
That would be why those on the left make as many ignorant , stupid comments about Bush as they do? Claiming he is a right wing Fundamentalist is a laugh riot. Yet you retards do it all the time.

What you REALLY mean is us low life right wing idiots should keep our mouths shut and stop voting so you left wing god's gift to mankind intelligent saviors can save us all.

ha ha ha ha ha
Brilliant!
the very Idea that Bush is some right wing Iealogue
is too funny
that's my main problem with
Bush
neo-cons and even more so McCain
not conservatives at all
but still better than the commies
I mean the liberals
same thing
 
Well, you got the look out for your health part right. I guess you live in your own little world where everything wrong is the liberals fault. I suggest you turn off the talk radio for a few, take a deep breath, and remember that we are all Americans fighting for the exact same thing, freedom to be ourselves and live our lives.


Did you know that Hitler's government was avidly against tobacco?

The promoted good health and wellness.

This is how totalitarianism is sold to the masses.

They don't get serious until after they take power.

I shutter to think what might be in store for us if the wrong people get elected.

If Barak O'Bama were to pick Hillary Clinton to be his running mate and he were to win.

How long do you give it before he is assassinated with Hillary waiting in the wings?

I really believe she is the anti-Christ. She's willing to say or do anything to acquire power.

These people's ego's are so out of control that they are dangerous by nature.
 
The left is closer to National Socialism.


confiscate guns, look out for your health, then decide who should live and die or who should be in the upper echelon of society.

Sounds pretty liberal to me.

I don't think you understand the subtle difference between Nazi National Socialism and regular socialism or Communism. See National Socialism is at its core. Everything is for the state, where as Socialism or Communism is suppose to be everything is for the people. Of course in practice communism never was this, but on paper that is what is meant to be.

When you say the left in America is closer to National Socialism you are ignoring the National Part of it. In Nazi Germany everything was to better the state. In communist Russia everything was suppose to be for the betterment of the people. Like I said in practice that is not what happened, never the less it is what it was meant to be.

Personally I think Amagonnakillyoualls stated ideas more closely resemble Nazi national socialism than traditional For the people Socialism.
 
Last edited:
That would be why those on the left make as many ignorant , stupid comments about Bush as they do? Claiming he is a right wing Fundamentalist is a laugh riot. Yet you retards do it all the time.

What you REALLY mean is us low life right wing idiots should keep our mouths shut and stop voting so you left wing god's gift to mankind intelligent saviors can save us all.
We're not the retards that voted for him as such... and, please learn to hide your jealousy.. its very unbecoming of you there gay sgt guy...
 
I don't think you understand the subtle difference between Nazi National Socialism and regular socialism or Communism. See National Socialism is at its core. Everything is for the state, where as Socialism or Communism is suppose to be everything is for the people. Of course in practice communism never was this, but on paper that is what is meant to be.

When you say the left in America is closer to National Socialism you are ignoring the National Part of it. In Nazi Germany everything was to better the state. In communist Russia everything was suppose to be for the betterment of the people. Like I said in practice that is not what happened, never the less it is what it was meant to be.

Personally I think Amagonnakillyoualls stated ideas more closely resemble Nazi national socialism than traditional For the people Socialism.


google Jonah Goldberg "Liberal Fascism"

I'm against totalitarianism.

Nazi's, Marxists, Liberal Democrats are all out to control you.

They create a bad economy and then erode our freedom incrementally.

China is now Fascist. Europe is Fascist.

The left in America wants to be more like Europe.

All of this will lead to Marxist, Fascist style oppression.

It doesn't matter what you call it. They are anti personal freedom and free market.

The word liberal is now usd to describe oppressive people.

One only has to look at a news cat or go to a university to find leftist though unchallenged.

When an ideology is unchallenged it erodes into an oppressive ideology.

absolute power...
 

Forum List

Back
Top