What is the American Experiment?

[$ecular#eckler]

"American Experiment" is probably dismissed as a rhetorical device by sociology students, because it seems that it has never been deliberated into the components that satisfy our sense of a scientific experiment. The front and back ends of the American Experiment tend to be ambiguous and the standards of reference for measuring anything are subjective and susceptible to biased influences. The American Experiment concerns the processing of abstract information (composition of legislation), which probably does not have a measurement standard; and the product, law, and law enforcement, have to be compared to the behavior of the society, which usually has an unpredictable delayed reaction, and the measurement standards thereof, seem to be unreliable due to partisan, racial, and commercial biases.

It is an, obviously, messy experiment system, but there is an actual experiment that was deployed that guides our reality, and it is relatively skewed of the altruistic ambitions that we trust it to be approaching. There is no guarantee that the American governing system is reliable for delivering what it promises to its citizenry - it is an experiment. In fact, there is considerable evidence that the government perpetually fails to deliver its promises, while at the same time the government insists that honest hard-working people pay to endure life in its success at delivering what would probably be described as, "tolerable social disorder." Eventually, that will become intolerable, and that will lead to a redesign of the government using the improved technology revealed since the deployment of the American Experiment.

The first generation of the American Experiment has probably expired its trial parameters, and the over-run is probably repeating and compounding errors in the processing of social issues. The imperfections of the government organization (experiment control system) probably become less tolerable relative to the evolution of society's sophistication.

If a perfect government is destined to guide its society toward its expectation, then what happens with a government that is not perfect?

Chances are the symptoms of social disorder that we are enduring are relative to the imperfections of the government design.

 

[progressive hunter]

none of the above,,,

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The "american experiment" is test of self-governance.
The Left can't stand freedom.
They are control freaks.
Their contempt for freedom of speech is one of the symptoms of their sickness.
The totally corrupt Democratic Party is rapidly goosestepping towards a neo-marxist totalitarian police state.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

"American Experiment" is probably dismissed as a rhetorical device by sociology students, because it seems that it has never been deliberated into the components that satisfy our sense of a scientific experiment. The front and back ends of the American Experiment tend to be ambiguous and the standards of reference for measuring anything are subjective and susceptible to biased influences. The American Experiment concerns the processing of abstract information (composition of legislation), which probably does not have a measurement standard; and the product, law, and law enforcement, have to be compared to the behavior of the society, which usually has an unpredictable delayed reaction, and the measurement standards thereof, seem to be unreliable due to partisan, racial, and commercial biases.

It is an, obviously, messy experiment system, but there is an actual experiment that was deployed that guides our reality, and it is relatively skewed of the altruistic ambitions that we trust it to be approaching. There is no guarantee that the American governing system is reliable for delivering what it promises to its citizenry - it is an experiment. In fact, there is considerable evidence that the government perpetually fails to deliver its promises, while at the same time the government insists that honest hard-working people pay to endure life in its success at delivering what would probably be described as, "tolerable social disorder." Eventually, that will become intolerable, and that will lead to a redesign of the government using the improved technology revealed since the deployment of the American Experiment.

The first generation of the American Experiment has probably expired its trial parameters, and the over-run is probably repeating and compounding errors in the processing of social issues. The imperfections of the government organization (experiment control system) probably become less tolerable relative to the evolution of society's sophistication.

If a perfect government is destined to guide its society toward its expectation, then what happens with a government that is not perfect?

Chances are the symptoms of social disorder that we are enduring are relative to the imperfections of the government design.

All Republics Go Bananas

 

[Votto]

"American Experiment" is probably dismissed as a rhetorical device by sociology students, because it seems that it has never been deliberated into the components that satisfy our sense of a scientific experiment. The front and back ends of the American Experiment tend to be ambiguous and the standards of reference for measuring anything are subjective and susceptible to biased influences. The American Experiment concerns the processing of abstract information (composition of legislation), which probably does not have a measurement standard; and the product, law, and law enforcement, have to be compared to the behavior of the society, which usually has an unpredictable delayed reaction, and the measurement standards thereof, seem to be unreliable due to partisan, racial, and commercial biases.

It is an, obviously, messy experiment system, but there is an actual experiment that was deployed that guides our reality, and it is relatively skewed of the altruistic ambitions that we trust it to be approaching. There is no guarantee that the American governing system is reliable for delivering what it promises to its citizenry - it is an experiment. In fact, there is considerable evidence that the government perpetually fails to deliver its promises, while at the same time the government insists that honest hard-working people pay to endure life in its success at delivering what would probably be described as, "tolerable social disorder." Eventually, that will become intolerable, and that will lead to a redesign of the government using the improved technology revealed since the deployment of the American Experiment.

The first generation of the American Experiment has probably expired its trial parameters, and the over-run is probably repeating and compounding errors in the processing of social issues. The imperfections of the government organization (experiment control system) probably become less tolerable relative to the evolution of society's sophistication.

If a perfect government is destined to guide its society toward its expectation, then what happens with a government that is not perfect?

Chances are the symptoms of social disorder that we are enduring are relative to the imperfections of the government design.

It was for a limited government in order that people could have more freedom

As James Madison wrote about the General Welfare Clause James Madison put in the Constitution

If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion in to their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county, and parish and pay them out of the public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor . . . Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America.

But Progressives use the General Welfare Clause to do just the opposite of its intention.

 

[ReinyDays]

The experiment is social mobility ... and it's proven wildly successful ... even Merry Ol' England is depreciating her aristocracy ...

Before ... the estate or manor you were born on is where you stayed your whole life ... your sons practicing the trade you practiced ... daughters becoming mothers ... no right to travel, no right to choose your profession, and if you're not in that church pew Sunday morning, we'll kill you ...

After ... you can pursue any profession where ever you'd like and sit any place you want to Sunday mornings ... outrageously liberal ... never been tried before so we call it "an experiment" ...

Lords and Ladies have always enjoyed these rights ... as given by God above ... the question is can the commoner handle these new constitutional rights ... can they be responsible to the community at large ... The Rich aren't shooting up public schools, it's The Poor ...

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

It was for a limited government in order that people could have more freedom

As James Madison wrote about the General Welfare Clause James Madison put in the Constitution

If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion in to their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county, and parish and pay them out of the public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor . . . Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America.

But Progressives use the General Welfare Clause to do just the opposite of its intention.

Private-Sector Statism

Not Congress, but the Gayist Mafia, has taken the education of America's children into its own hands.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The experiment is social mobility ... and it's proven wildly successful ... even Merry Ol' England is depreciating her aristocracy ...

Before ... the estate or manor you were born on is where you stayed your whole life ... your sons practicing the trade you practiced ... daughters becoming mothers ... no right to travel, no right to choose your profession, and if you're not in that church pew Sunday morning, we'll kill you ...

After ... you can pursue any profession where ever you'd like and sit any place you want to Sunday mornings ... outrageously liberal ... never been tried before so we call it "an experiment" ...

Lords and Ladies have always enjoyed these rights ... as given by God above ... the question is can the commoner handle these new constitutional rights ... can they be responsible to the community at large ... The Rich aren't shooting up public schools, it's The Poor ...

Americans Who Support Preppy Rights Hate Their Own Daddies for Not Getting Rich and Spoiling Them

Inherited wealth and class mobility cannot co-exist. A self-made man is a self-destroyed man: a workoholic zombie or a bootlicker. That exception proves the rule.

Showing how deceptive your sacred-cow Constitution, it only forbids aristocratic titles. Those are meaningless without inheritance, and inheritance without titles is no different from an aristocracy.

Ironically, another thing missing is a coat of arms. The born-rich pull strings to get their gutless unpatriotic sons from having to fight in our wars. There is a connection between Lincoln's race treason and his allowing the plutes to buy their way out of fighting the Civil War. The heiristocratic Adamses, the family that had done the most to bring on that war, told the one family member who volunteered for it how foolish he was. The guillotine-fodder talk the talk but won't walk the walk.

 

[the other mike]

"American Experiment" is probably dismissed as a rhetorical device by sociology students, because it seems that it has never been deliberated into the components that satisfy our sense of a scientific experiment. The front and back ends of the American Experiment tend to be ambiguous and the standards of reference for measuring anything are subjective and susceptible to biased influences. The American Experiment concerns the processing of abstract information (composition of legislation), which probably does not have a measurement standard; and the product, law, and law enforcement, have to be compared to the behavior of the society, which usually has an unpredictable delayed reaction, and the measurement standards thereof, seem to be unreliable due to partisan, racial, and commercial biases.

It is an, obviously, messy experiment system, but there is an actual experiment that was deployed that guides our reality, and it is relatively skewed of the altruistic ambitions that we trust it to be approaching. There is no guarantee that the American governing system is reliable for delivering what it promises to its citizenry - it is an experiment. In fact, there is considerable evidence that the government perpetually fails to deliver its promises, while at the same time the government insists that honest hard-working people pay to endure life in its success at delivering what would probably be described as, "tolerable social disorder." Eventually, that will become intolerable, and that will lead to a redesign of the government using the improved technology revealed since the deployment of the American Experiment.

The first generation of the American Experiment has probably expired its trial parameters, and the over-run is probably repeating and compounding errors in the processing of social issues. The imperfections of the government organization (experiment control system) probably become less tolerable relative to the evolution of society's sophistication.

If a perfect government is destined to guide its society toward its expectation, then what happens with a government that is not perfect?

Chances are the symptoms of social disorder that we are enduring are relative to the imperfections of the government design.

The government isn't exactly the problem.
The shadow government behind the curtains is the biggest problem.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

The government isn't exactly the problem.
The shadow government behind the curtains is the biggest problem.

That means the government is not "working" correctly.