Mr. President
BOARD PRESIDENT..carry on
- Aug 22, 2008
- 1,423
- 346
- 98
You said you wanted "A GOOD ARGUEMENT" you didn't ask for a "couple good things about McCain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So kind of you to stop by.Gem's post was full of valid points, and flawlessly presented. It was also a thoughtful response to the question you posted. Your response in turn (having no other avenue I assume) was asinine and thin. If this is how you react to such an eloquent and thoughtful response... maybe that's why you hear crickets when you pose your questions.
I just stumbled on this forum today in search of real time thoughts on the Obama victory, and there are a few "gems" on this site, but for the most part I am once again disappointed and moving on. It shouldn't be that someone of average intelligence, such as myself, should feel superior to the majority. Me thinks the Internets is the wrong place for real political discussion. That or religion. no matter who wins the gold ... it's still the special Olympics.
Oh and when I say "win" I use it loosely... because it's usually fucktards like you who "win" the argument. Not because you are better or smarter, but because people finally give up trying to reason with you and your persistent ignorance.
You said you wanted "A GOOD ARGUEMENT" you didn't ask for a "couple good things about McCain.
Not a worthy question at all. Asking to give only pro McCain reasons as to why someone voted for him may not be entirely possible given the fact that the comparison is truly what made them vote for McCain. If McCain had an excellent economic plan but Mr. Donut had a better one I would vote for the better one. So the arguement that McCain had the best economic plan could only be made in "comparison too". Not soley based in and of itself.
I brought up the frequency of posts as an insinuation as too a need to just talk instead of think through the validity of statements. Which is not off the subject of this question given that my opinion is that a complete answer can not be given without the allowance of comparisons.
If RS didn't want "Obama Bashing" then all he need say is compare plans and use educated and solid interpretations of the candidates views when comparing and try to sway from generic opinions rendered without any validity or substance.