What do Trump supporters think of Steve Bannon’s exposé of Trump’s plot to steal the election?



This amazing tape recording was made three days before the 2020 election and explains exactly Trump’s criminal strategy to stay in power after losing the electoral vote.

The tape was made during a long private meeting in which Steve Bannon was boasting stupidly while prepping his Chinese partners at the TV station of corrupt ex-Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, who was at that time his financial patron (he earlier lost the support of the Mercer family in 2018).

The entire audio is transcribed below, and it indicates many pauses for Chinese translations. Guo Wengui was like a super-corrupt “Donald Trump” in Communist China who worked quietly but extremely closely with the previous powerful intelligence chief of Beijing (who was himself eventually purged). Guo is widely thought to have later worked as a “double agent” for XiJinping, pretending to be a “wanted” anti-communist billionaire who escaped to the United States with valuable inside information, while actually trying to bring chaos to the U.S. … by re-electing Donald Trump. XiJinping’s intelligence operators, like Putin, apparently thought “Trump was a chump” and an easily-manipulated moron.

Guo Wengui is today struggling mightily to stay out of prison and has declared bankruptcy, having sold his mansions and $35 million dollar yacht. He claims to be worth a mere $100,000 while being sued by countless investors for hundreds of millions. He has been abandoned by his once fanatic Chinese diaspora anti-communist followers, who now view him as a charlatan if not a Chinese spy. Trump advisor, lawyer and co-conspirator Rudy Giuliani was arrested for one of his own earlier crimes while meeting Guo on his yacht floating in the Long Island Sound near NYC.

The amazing story of the Steve Bannon-Guo Wengui pro-Trump grifter alliance should serve as a lesson to the “little people” who follow conspiracy politics pushed by rightwing media and “Dark Money.” This particular group actually originated many of the internet “Big Lies” that Trump’s campaigners used before, during and after the 2020 election.

So, Trumpster morons, see if you can answer this question …

How do you explain Steve Bannon’s audio exactly predicting Trump’s criminal attempt to steal the election … before it even occurred?

***

*The complete transcript of the Bannon audio: Here's the whole transcript of that leaked Steve Bannon tape, annotated

**The audio presented earlier at the Jan. 6th Congressional Investigation:

What's amazing is you psycho sob's can't stop crying about trump.
 
Last edited:
Mother Jones....roflmfao
Mother Jones has been a finalist for 31 National Magazine Awards, winning seven times (including three times for General Excellence in 2001, 2008 and 2010).[18]

The Park Center for Independent Media named Mother Jones the winner of the fifth annual Izzy Award in April 2013, for "special achievement in independent media," for its 2012 reporting, including its analysis of gun violence in the United States, coverage of dark money funding of candidates, and release of a video of Mitt Romney stating that 47 percent of the people of the United States see themselves as victims and are dependent on the government.[19]

In August 2013, Mother Jones' co-editors Monika Bauerlein and Clara Jeffery won the PEN/Nora Magid Award for Magazine Editing.[20] Also in 2010, Mother Jones won the Online News Association Award for Online Topical Reporting,[21] and in 2011 won the Utne Reader Independent Press Award for General Excellence.[22]

In 2017, Mother Jones won the Magazine of the Year award from the American Society of Magazine Editors.[23]

Mother Jones (magazine) - Wikipedia


can't wait to see your list
 
Oh? So the actual hearings were what then?

I have been really clear on this - they were infomercials.
You could say that they resembled a grand jury hearing with only 1 side represented.
That however is not how they sold it.
 


This amazing tape recording was made three days before the 2020 election and explains exactly Trump’s criminal strategy to stay in power after losing the electoral vote.

The tape was made during a long private meeting in which Steve Bannon was boasting stupidly while prepping his Chinese partners at the TV station of corrupt ex-Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, who was at that time his financial patron (he earlier lost the support of the Mercer family in 2018).

The entire audio is transcribed below, and it indicates many pauses for Chinese translations. Guo Wengui was like a super-corrupt “Donald Trump” in Communist China who worked quietly but extremely closely with the previous powerful intelligence chief of Beijing (who was himself eventually purged). Guo is widely thought to have later worked as a “double agent” for XiJinping, pretending to be a “wanted” anti-communist billionaire who escaped to the United States with valuable inside information, while actually trying to bring chaos to the U.S. … by re-electing Donald Trump. XiJinping’s intelligence operators, like Putin, apparently thought “Trump was a chump” and an easily-manipulated moron.

Guo Wengui is today struggling mightily to stay out of prison and has declared bankruptcy, having sold his mansions and $35 million dollar yacht. He claims to be worth a mere $100,000 while being sued by countless investors for hundreds of millions. He has been abandoned by his once fanatic Chinese diaspora anti-communist followers, who now view him as a charlatan if not a Chinese spy. Trump advisor, lawyer and co-conspirator Rudy Giuliani was arrested for one of his own earlier crimes while meeting Guo on his yacht floating in the Long Island Sound near NYC.

The amazing story of the Steve Bannon-Guo Wengui pro-Trump grifter alliance should serve as a lesson to the “little people” who follow conspiracy politics pushed by rightwing media and “Dark Money.” This particular group actually originated many of the internet “Big Lies” that Trump’s campaigners used before, during and after the 2020 election.

So, Trumpster morons, see if you can answer this question …

How do you explain Steve Bannon’s audio exactly predicting Trump’s criminal attempt to steal the election … before it even occurred?

***

*The complete transcript of the Bannon audio: Here's the whole transcript of that leaked Steve Bannon tape, annotated

**The audio presented earlier at the Jan. 6th Congressional Investigation:

Did you forget already? Trump could shoot someone on 5th Ave and his supporters would still support him. So, what difference does it make what Bannon says?
 
Mother Jones has been a finalist for 31 National Magazine Awards, winning seven times (including three times for General Excellence in 2001, 2008 and 2010).[18]

The Park Center for Independent Media named Mother Jones the winner of the fifth annual Izzy Award in April 2013, for "special achievement in independent media," for its 2012 reporting, including its analysis of gun violence in the United States, coverage of dark money funding of candidates, and release of a video of Mitt Romney stating that 47 percent of the people of the United States see themselves as victims and are dependent on the government.[19]

In August 2013, Mother Jones' co-editors Monika Bauerlein and Clara Jeffery won the PEN/Nora Magid Award for Magazine Editing.[20] Also in 2010, Mother Jones won the Online News Association Award for Online Topical Reporting,[21] and in 2011 won the Utne Reader Independent Press Award for General Excellence.[22]

In 2017, Mother Jones won the Magazine of the Year award from the American Society of Magazine Editors.[23]

Mother Jones (magazine) - Wikipedia


can't wait to see your list
Ooooo....The rest of the moonbat crackpot media vouches for Mother Jones!

Nothing more legit than a bunch of back-slappers sitting around giving one another awards!



noFUcks.jpg
 
I have been really clear on this - they were infomercials.
You could say that they resembled a grand jury hearing with only 1 side represented.
That however is not how they sold it.
Not too many infomercials feature sworn testimony..

But why do you persist in offering your opinion of something from which you dutifully averted your eyes?
 
I have been really clear on this - they were infomercials.
You could say that they resembled a grand jury hearing with only 1 side represented.
That however is not how they sold it.

WTF? People who pleaded not guilty and went to trial did not mount a defense? Or is it they didn't have a defense for their actions?
 
Not too many infomercials feature sworn testimony..

But why do you persist in offering your opinion of something from which you dutifully averted your eyes?

Only 1 narrative was presented.
I know that you don't know what that means.
 
Only 1 narrative was presented.
I know that you don't know what that means.
No, you're wrong...

A large number of narratives were offered by numerous witnesses.

Your problem is that they were consistent.

Grifty was invited to tell his side, under oath.....but you know how that goes - the buffoon would have been spitroasted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top