Peach
Gold Member
- Jan 10, 2009
- 20,864
- 2,730
- 245
He was indicted for FIRST degree murder, you want him charged with a less serious crime? WHY?
Making it a hate crime makes it more severe
No, you cannot get more severe than murder 1.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was indicted for FIRST degree murder, you want him charged with a less serious crime? WHY?
Making it a hate crime makes it more severe
No, you cannot get more severe than murder 1.
The crime occurred in 2000, why is it news NOW? He was indicted for 1st degree, and the posters are angry he didn't get a lesser charge? What ails you? He was properly charged. Why give a jury the option of less than life in prison? The story is fabricated, the crime did not occur a few months ago:
Shifflett Slaying Suspect Improving; Murphy Remains Unfit for Va. Trial - The Washington Post | HighBeam Research
And no "hate crime' was considered because 1st degree murder is more serious!
Several "blacks kills whites" sites are pretending this was a recent crime. I'm trying to find out what sentence the killer received; it is low life to use that child's life for the retense of "ERIC HOLDER" did something. [B]Holder was't AG in 2000.[/B]
I wonder why this piece of shit wasn't charged with a hate crime?
Too bad. Whatever happened to Lady Justice being blind to color of skin?I wonder why this piece of shit wasn't charged with a hate crime?
It's not a hate crime to kill a white.
This man should not have been charged with a hate crime. All such crimes are based upon hate. This man should have been charged with 1st degree murder and received a just sentence just as any other killer should be charged and convicted.
Adding "hate crime" to a charge because of political reasons is unamerican.
Whether the victim is black or white, all victims deserve at the very least equal justice. I hope this SOB rots in prison.
Immie
I wonder why this piece of shit wasn't charged with a hate crime?
If he killed the boy simply because he was white, that is a hate crime and he should have been charged as such.
But let us not forget that only blacks can be the victim of hate crimes, because they are somehow 'special'.
I wonder why this piece of shit wasn't charged with a hate crime?
It's not a hate crime to kill a white.
On October 7, 1989, Todd Mitchell, a young black man, instigated an attack against a young white boy. He was subsequently convicted of aggravated battery in the Circuit Court for Kenosha County. According to Wisconsin statute, Mitchell's sentence was increased, because the court found that he had selected his victim based on race.
Wisconsin v. Mitchell | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law
This man should not have been charged with a hate crime. All such crimes are based upon hate. This man should have been charged with 1st degree murder and received a just sentence just as any other killer should be charged and convicted.
Adding "hate crime" to a charge because of political reasons is unamerican.
Whether the victim is black or white, all victims deserve at the very least equal justice. I hope this SOB rots in prison.
Immie