West's Communist Party claim about Democrats

[bripat9643]

How are you going to redistribute the money when Buffett doesn't pay it? Or is he the only one who gets a pass on that?

I suspect that MikeK traditionally used a .38 snub nose to redistribute liquor store cash drawers...

The difference between armed holdups and Obama is only a matter of scale.

I have more respect for Al Capone that I do for Obama. At least he provided a service that people actually wanted, and he didn't tell people he was doing it for their benefit when he was shaking them down.

 

[JakeStarkey]

None of the Carter years' excess in the economy justified Reagan's redistribtion of the wealth scheme from the working and middle classes to the wealthy and corporatiions.

The process needs to be reversed to an extent, then balanced, and MR will do that. Thank God he does to have to worry about wing nut nutters like you guys anymore to the far right.

 

[Uncensored2008]

None of the Carter years' excess in the economy justified Reagan's redistribtion of the wealth scheme from the working and middle classes to the wealthy and corporatiions.

Just in case anyone missed that you're not just a leftist, but a really fucking stupid leftist....

The process needs to be reversed to an extent, then balanced, and MR will do that. Thank God he does to have to worry about wing nut nutters like you guys anymore to the far right.

A 90% marginal tax rate is all you seek, huh Jake?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Uncensored acting like a doosh does not pass for confidence in his pronouncements.

The wealthy and corporations have to pay their fair share, period. That will not balance the budget, but it is a start.

The entitlement programs need reforming (e.g., means testing, increased SS maxium income levels, retirement age increases).

Defense is going to have to be mightily cut.

Increased wages and salaries for the working and middle classes will produce increased production, thus raising profit lines and distribution net works.

Radical so called 'free markets' is a lie: that leads only to monopoly, and that leads to enslavement of the working people.

Nope, The Rabbi is spinning on the tip of his pointy head.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Uncensored acting like a doosh does not pass for confidence in his pronouncements.

The wealthy and corporations have to pay their fair share, period.

Thanks Comrade Obama....

That will not balance the budget, but it is a start.

It's not a start, it's just the class warfare that you and your Messiah® think are the ticket to another term for him.

The entitlement programs need reforming (e.g., means testing, increased SS maxium income levels, retirement age increases).

Ah yes, Social Security is an "entitlement" to be denied to those who are not part of Obama's core support.

Gee, who saw THAT one coming...

You fucking democrats are so clever, you had everyone fooled...

Defense is going to have to be mightily cut.

But no worries, bailouts of GM and Goldman Sachs are safe - we HAVE to have priorities, after all....

Increased wages and salaries for the working and middle classes will produce increased production, thus raising profit lines and distribution net works.

Ohh, nothing spell "increased production" like our Ruler dictating what business pays their employees....

I take it that Obama has a "5 year plan?"

Radical so called 'free markets' is a lie: that leads only to monopoly, and that leads to enslavement of the working people.

Got it, so you'll provide a fully managed economy that is centrally planned entirely by the state. No one guessed that this was your agenda...

I mean, none of us read Marx and understood the script or anything....

Nope, The Rabbi is spinning on the tip of his pointy head.

My only question is why you don't just move to North Korea, where they already run things exactly the way you want, and leave us alone?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Too all:

Be sure to vote for comrade Jake, to show you believe he is a Republican...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/218698-i-believe-jake-starkey.html

He's as Republican as Joe Stalin and Pol Pot, so show your support...

 

[bripat9643]

Uncensored acting like a doosh does not pass for confidence in his pronouncements.

The wealthy and corporations have to pay their fair share, period. That will not balance the budget, but it is a start.

The entitlement programs need reforming (e.g., means testing, increased SS maxium income levels, retirement age increases).

Defense is going to have to be mightily cut.

Increased wages and salaries for the working and middle classes will produce increased production, thus raising profit lines and distribution net works.

How will increasing taxes on the wealthy increase salaries for the middle class?

Do libturds think this stuff through before they post it, or do they just mindlessly use any complaint about the economy to justify tax increases?

Radical so called 'free markets' is a lie: that leads only to monopoly, and that leads to enslavement of the working people.

And your proof for this claim is what? Can you provide an example of a monopoly that "Radical free markets" produced?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

None of the Carter years' excess in the economy justified Reagan's redistribtion of the wealth scheme from the working and middle classes to the wealthy and corporatiions.

The process needs to be reversed to an extent, then balanced, and MR will do that. Thank God he does to have to worry about wing nut nutters like you guys anymore to the far right.

Wrong as usual Komrade

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Uncensored acting like a doosh does not pass for confidence in his pronouncements.

The wealthy and corporations have to pay their fair share, period. That will not balance the budget, but it is a start.

The entitlement programs need reforming (e.g., means testing, increased SS maxium income levels, retirement age increases).

Defense is going to have to be mightily cut.

Increased wages and salaries for the working and middle classes will produce increased production, thus raising profit lines and distribution net works.

Radical so called 'free markets' is a lie: that leads only to monopoly, and that leads to enslavement of the working people.

Nope, The Rabbi is spinning on the tip of his pointy head.

BOLO Marxist Code words: "Working people"

 

[Dragon]

It's interesting and revealing that, given any encouragement at all, the usual suspects on this thread are quick to abandon talk of Communism and revert to what their real agenda is: an attack on liberalism. In fact, since Communists have never been a strong presence in America while liberals have, it's a reasonable hypothesis, well borne out by observation, that anti-Communism is only a tool for such people in the quest to attack liberalism.

That being so, confusion of liberalism with Communism isn't a mistake but the entire point.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Modern American Liberalism is Neo-Marxism just with slicker packaging. Hope. Change. Transformation of the USA. Negative Rights. It's all there

 

[JakeStarkey]

Uncensored acting like a doosh does not pass for confidence in his pronouncements.

The wealthy and corporations have to pay their fair share, period. That will not balance the budget, but it is a start.

The entitlement programs need reforming (e.g., means testing, increased SS maxium income levels, retirement age increases).

Defense is going to have to be mightily cut.

Increased wages and salaries for the working and middle classes will produce increased production, thus raising profit lines and distribution net works.

How will increasing taxes on the wealthy increase salaries for the middle class?

Do libturds think this stuff through before they post it, or do they just mindlessly use any complaint about the economy to justify tax increases?

Radical so called 'free markets' is a lie: that leads only to monopoly, and that leads to enslavement of the working people.

And your proof for this claim is what? Can you provide an example of a monopoly that "Radical free markets" produced?

U. S. Steel? Standard Oil of Ohio? Thus the trust busting by TR, thank heavens. He knew that businesses should not grow so large that they couldn't fail. Sound familiar, little one. . . hmmm?

You would have been one of JP's sycophants laughing him on as he urged every lion to do its duty when TR went on safari to Africa after his presidency.

 

[bripat9643]

It's interesting and revealing that, given any encouragement at all, the usual suspects on this thread are quick to abandon talk of Communism and revert to what their real agenda is: an attack on liberalism. In fact, since Communists have never been a strong presence in America while liberals have, it's a reasonable hypothesis, well borne out by observation, that anti-Communism is only a tool for such people in the quest to attack liberalism.

That being so, confusion of liberalism with Communism isn't a mistake but the entire point.

The belief that there's any significant difference between communism and what liberals believe is harbored only by the delusional communist and liberals. A laboratory rat may think the other rats in his cage are as different as night and day, but to the lab assitant, they all look the same.

The differences among lefties don't amount to a hill of beans when you understand that they all avocate the exact same policies: punative taxes on the rich, massive increases in government spending, strangling regulations on business, nationalization of private industry and endless interference in our daily lives. In the end, what is the net effect of their petty doctrinal squabbles?

Not a damn thing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

bripat is now writing like a nutter doosh from the far wing nut right. This type of nonsense damages Romney far more than Obama. Obama's supporters could care less what a doosh nutter thinks. Some on the right might pay attention to this nonsense.

 

[kaz]

bripat is now writing like a nutter doosh from the far wing nut right. This type of nonsense damages Romney far more than Obama. Obama's supporters could care less what a doosh nutter thinks. Some on the right might pay attention to this nonsense.

It cracks me up every time you call someone else a "nutter." Carry on...

 

[Uncensored2008]

U. S. Steel?

Comrade Fakey Jake, didn't U.S. Steel us the NY State police to intimidate workers and competitors?

In fact, they had Albany in their hip pocket.

So, even a shit fer brains communist like you should be able to grasp that ONLY government can bestow a monopoly, as a monopoly (other than natural monopoly) requires coercion to exist.

Standard Oil of Ohio? Thus the trust busting by TR, thank heavens. He knew that businesses should not grow so large that they couldn't fail. Sound familiar, little one. . . hmmm?

You would have been one of JP's sycophants laughing him on as he urged every lion to do its duty when TR went on safari to Africa after his presidency.

You sure are dumb, Jake.

Most rat turds score higher on standardized testing than you - it's why you're an Obama supporter.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Uncensored is dooshy, some how confusing hard core monopolies like U.S. Steel as the tools for communists.

Uncensored is a doosh nutter, no two ways about it. We ran him out of the GOP, and he can't find his way back.

 

[bripat9643]

Radical so called 'free markets' is a lie: that leads only to monopoly, and that leads to enslavement of the working people.

And your proof for this claim is what? Can you provide an example of a monopoly that "Radical free markets" produced?

U. S. Steel? Standard Oil of Ohio? Thus the trust busting by TR, thank heavens. He knew that businesses should not grow so large that they couldn't fail. Sound familiar, little one. . . hmmm?

Nope. Neither were monopolies. Both had numerous competitors. Standard Oil of Ohio was one of the pieces of the original Standard Oil, for your information.

You would have been one of JP's sycophants laughing him on as he urged every lion to do its duty when TR went on safari to Africa after his presidency.

You're babbling now, Jakey. Time to put down the crack pipe.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Uncensored is dooshy, some how confusing hard core monopolies like U.S. Steel as the tools for communists.

ROFL

Jake, you're so incredibly dumb.

U.S. Steel and the other monopolies were looters who used a corrupt government to subvert the market.

In a free market, monopolies cannot exist. Someone will always compete. Only through violence and threats of violence can competition be stopped. The state is the final arbiter of violence. Violence on wide scale cannot exist without the collusion of the state.

Carnegie had no army, he used the state to achieve his aims.

Uncensored is a doosh nutter, no two ways about it. We ran him out of the GOP, and he can't find his way back.

Jake, you're a stupid little guy, even for a douche. Republican isn't spelled "CCCP," moron.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Uncensored tries to have it both ways. A free market guarantees the emergence of monopolies like U. S. Steel and Standard Oil of Ohio, which requires the regulation of government to keep them from subverting the market.

The doosh dishonestly argues against his premise that free markets prevent monopolies when in fact our history show quite the opposite. Corporations always try to bribe government; that's what corporations and businesses do as a part of thriving and surviving. The doosh randomly babbles but offers nothing compelling.

No wonder real conservatives and general Republicans have no respect for folks like Uncensored.