Where is TruthDon't Mean Shit. this mawning? Has she shown her partisan hack face yet?
Just look in the mirror!
I'm looking over your shoulder! I see you.
So, that was the creepy shiver that went up my back!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is TruthDon't Mean Shit. this mawning? Has she shown her partisan hack face yet?
Just look in the mirror!
I'm looking over your shoulder! I see you.
Suddenly! It doesn't matter! That's the spin.
Suddenly! It doesn't matter! That's the spin.
It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.
Suddenly! It doesn't matter! That's the spin.
It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.
oh it mattered on both sides.
If walker had lost libs would have proclaimed this was a national mandate for obama., to finish the job.
It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.
oh it mattered on both sides.
If walker had lost libs would have proclaimed this was a national mandate for obama., to finish the job.
Instead, it is a mandate that Obama is finished.
liberty just might be on an up-tick thankfully.
liberty just might be on an up-tick thankfully.
You have a rather jaded sense of liberty. What did we see in WI? The rights of some taken away by the majority.
I'll ask again what was taken away?liberty just might be on an up-tick thankfully.
You have a rather jaded sense of liberty. What did we see in WI? The rights of some taken away by the majority.
Who needs a topic when some can just continue to shamelessly gloat like childish sore winners? God, the conservatives are turning into such whiny drama queens.
The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ran Eugene McCarthy for President.)
The party could best be described as social democratic in orientation, although party statements almost invariably used the terms "small-d democratic" or "progressive" instead. Its founders chose the name "New Party" in an effort to strike a fresh tone, free of associations with dogmas and ideological debates.
How about a discussion on the New Party and what it stands for?
The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ran Eugene McCarthy for President.)
The party could best be described as social democratic in orientation, although party statements almost invariably used the terms "small-d democratic" or "progressive" instead. Its founders chose the name "New Party" in an effort to strike a fresh tone, free of associations with dogmas and ideological debates.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Party_(United_States)
Interesting this sounds so familiar does this sound like what the president has been trying to do?
How about a discussion on the New Party and what it stands for?
The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ran Eugene McCarthy for President.)
The party could best be described as social democratic in orientation, although party statements almost invariably used the terms "small-d democratic" or "progressive" instead. Its founders chose the name "New Party" in an effort to strike a fresh tone, free of associations with dogmas and ideological debates.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Party_(United_States)
Interesting this sounds so familiar does this sound like what the president has been trying to do?
Sounds better than the old party, minus the grand.
I would prefer not to have an American plutocracy, tell me, who has the more realistic concerns?