Well the recall election is over with what shall we discuss now?

[konradv]

Where is TruthDon't Mean Shit. this mawning? Has she shown her partisan hack face yet?

Just look in the mirror!

I'm looking over your shoulder! I see you.

So, that was the creepy shiver that went up my back!

 

[konradv]

Suddenly! It doesn't matter! That's the spin.

It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Suddenly! It doesn't matter! That's the spin.

It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.

oh it mattered on both sides.
If walker had lost libs would have proclaimed this was a national mandate for obama., to finish the job.

 

[SniperFire]

Suddenly! It doesn't matter! That's the spin.

It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.

oh it mattered on both sides.
If walker had lost libs would have proclaimed this was a national mandate for obama., to finish the job.

Instead, it is a mandate that Obama is finished.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It matters to the people of WI. Nationally it shouldn't be more than a blip, considering the slap in the face the Reps gave women yesterday. With unions, women and Latinos up in arms against Rep propaganda, Romney isn't being helped out by his party, at all.

oh it mattered on both sides.
If walker had lost libs would have proclaimed this was a national mandate for obama., to finish the job.

Instead, it is a mandate that Obama is finished.

Exactly.

 

[Wry Catcher]

liberty just might be on an up-tick thankfully.

You have a rather jaded sense of liberty. What did we see in WI? The rights of some taken away by the majority.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

liberty just might be on an up-tick thankfully.

You have a rather jaded sense of liberty. What did we see in WI? The rights of some taken away by the majority.

What was taken away?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

liberty just might be on an up-tick thankfully.

You have a rather jaded sense of liberty. What did we see in WI? The rights of some taken away by the majority.

I'll ask again what was taken away?

 

[bitterlyclingin]

One suggestion, bigreb, is the 'journolist' up and operational again? It seems there is a ban on any of the MSM networks allowing Ed Klein on air to promote his new book "The Amateur" because of its devasting criticism of Obama.
Then there was the apparently now confirmed report of Obama's membership in the New Party, a Communist leaning organization when he was running for Illinois State Senator. This report was brought up during the 2008 campaign but the Lefty conspirators on the journolist (The Unofficial Campaign To Elect Barack Hussein Obama) managed to deep six it out of the news cycle. One of this board's members tried to bring this reported Obama membership up today, but the mods here apparently deep sixed his post as well.

The Spike (Ed Klein edition) | Power Line

Obama’s Third-Party History - Stanley Kurtz - National Review Online

 

[occupied]

Who needs a topic when some can just continue to shamelessly gloat like childish sore winners? God, the conservatives are turning into such whiny drama queens.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Who needs a topic when some can just continue to shamelessly gloat like childish sore winners? God, the conservatives are turning into such whiny drama queens.

Whiny? Why would the conservatives whine after kicking the shit out of the left during this recall election that the left wanted? Sounds like the left is whining.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How about a discussion on the New Party and what it stands for?

The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ran Eugene McCarthy for President.)
The party could best be described as social democratic in orientation, although party statements almost invariably used the terms "small-d democratic" or "progressive" instead. Its founders chose the name "New Party" in an effort to strike a fresh tone, free of associations with dogmas and ideological debates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Party_(United_States)

Interesting this sounds so familiar does this sound like what the president has been trying to do?

 

[occupied]

How about a discussion on the New Party and what it stands for?

The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ran Eugene McCarthy for President.)
The party could best be described as social democratic in orientation, although party statements almost invariably used the terms "small-d democratic" or "progressive" instead. Its founders chose the name "New Party" in an effort to strike a fresh tone, free of associations with dogmas and ideological debates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Party_(United_States)

Interesting this sounds so familiar does this sound like what the president has been trying to do?

Sounds better than the old party, minus the grand.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How about a discussion on the New Party and what it stands for?

The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states. The party was active from 1992 to 1998. (There had been an earlier, unrelated New Party in 1968 that ran Eugene McCarthy for President.)
The party could best be described as social democratic in orientation, although party statements almost invariably used the terms "small-d democratic" or "progressive" instead. Its founders chose the name "New Party" in an effort to strike a fresh tone, free of associations with dogmas and ideological debates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Party_(United_States)

Interesting this sounds so familiar does this sound like what the president has been trying to do?

Sounds better than the old party, minus the grand.

I prefer not to have a european socialist America.

 

[occupied]

I would prefer not to have an American plutocracy, tell me, who has the more realistic concerns?

 

[Rozman]

How Obama single handedly saved the world from the evil Republican horde advancing on the villages raping,plundering and pillaging and acting downright totally tacky.

Or we can tell the truth about our Food Stamp President.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I would prefer not to have an American plutocracy, tell me, who has the more realistic concerns?

It's not the socialist. that's for sure.