g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 127,128
- 70,849
- 2,605
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
Those drug tests make conservatives feel good but they yield painfully few violators
A waste of taxpayer dollars
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
Yo, drug testing should pay for itself after catching a few? The money used for Welfare should pay for it in the long run!!! The Radicals don`t like it because it might cost them voters in the long run!!! Because the ones who get caught will have to find a JOB, and eventually their mindset will change, hey, being responsible for yourself is the "RIGHT" thing to do!!!!!!
"GTP"
View attachment 37436
1stRambo
Prove who she is and that she actually does all of that.
Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
Bottom line is libtards are liars. I more than libs love my country. Commie puke.Thinkprogress is Soros, your source sucks as most libtarded ideas suck. Yawn, moving on.Those drug tests make conservatives feel good but they yield painfully few violators
A waste of taxpayer dollars
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
AmericanFirst who always posts that he believes in America LAST can't post proof to the contrary.
Bottom line is RWs want to see the poor starve.
Many of those who tested positive were combat veterans which is a group the right despises. Yeah, they'll put little "support our troops" stickers on their cars but don't expect them to actually do that.
RWs also want to give even more to the 1%. That's why they don't demand an end to corporate welfare and why they vote for politicians who take from the poor and give to the rich.
Those drug tests make conservatives feel good but they yield painfully few violators
A waste of taxpayer dollars
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
Yo, drug testing should pay for itself after catching a few? The money used for Welfare should pay for it in the long run!!! The Radicals don`t like it because it might cost them voters in the long run!!! Because the ones who get caught will have to find a JOB, and eventually their mindset will change, hey, being responsible for yourself is the "RIGHT" thing to do!!!!!!
"GTP"
View attachment 37436
1stRambo
Prove who she is and that she actually does all of that.
Yo, go to any Ghetto, you will learn something!!!
"GTP"
"Obama Hates America"
Sooner or later the truly ignorant were bound to appear...Multigenerational profesional layabouts should be sterilized and put in work camps. They are a bane on society.
Better than leftwingbats thinking. Commie puke.Make the welfare recipient pay for it.
You clearly did not think this through before you said it.
I missed that post but it's really typical of RW "thinking".
Bottom line is libtards are liars. I more than libs love my country. Commie puke.Thinkprogress is Soros, your source sucks as most libtarded ideas suck. Yawn, moving on.Those drug tests make conservatives feel good but they yield painfully few violators
A waste of taxpayer dollars
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
AmericanFirst who always posts that he believes in America LAST can't post proof to the contrary.
Bottom line is RWs want to see the poor starve.
Many of those who tested positive were combat veterans which is a group the right despises. Yeah, they'll put little "support our troops" stickers on their cars but don't expect them to actually do that.
RWs also want to give even more to the 1%. That's why they don't demand an end to corporate welfare and why they vote for politicians who take from the poor and give to the rich.
So, we deny them benefits, then we take the children away, and then what? We break up families because someone smokes weed? We take children away from parents because the parents smoke weed? Are we going to Colorado and do the same? What do we do with disabled Vets cut from the program? Are we to allow them to go without food after being disabled in combat?Are the ones cutting people out going to be tested also? They get paid with tax dollars. Local, county, and state employees get paid with tax dollars. Shouldn't they also be tested? And, what is the states going to do with those that fail the drug tests? If a mother fails, and has three very small children to feed, what will happen to the children? Are the states going to allow them to starve because their mother failed the drug test? And, what about testing everyone that gets tax dollars? Those that are requiring the tests, get paid via tax dollars. Are we going to be fair across the board, or just single out the poor, the less fortunate, and the disabled? Are we going to deny disabled Vets benefits? Are we going to deny small children food? What happens to those cut from the program?I support this
Lets get it expanded to cover all 50 states
-Geaux
In most states, people collecting welfare can “earn” more money than if they worked full time at a minimum wage job, and these welfare payouts can take up roughly one-quarter to one-third of eachindividual state’s budget.
In order to cut down on these insanely high and growing costs, many states have moved to crack down on waste, fraud and abuse in their welfare programs.
One method many states have chosen to do this, and that 12 more states are now seriously looking at, is through drug testing for welfare recipients, the theory being that if someone has enough money to buy and use drugs, they don’t need or deserve welfare assistance from taxpayers.
Of course liberals will weep and wail and gnash their teeth, calling the drug testing of welfare recipients cruel, unfair and discriminatory, apparently oblivious to the fact that a majority of the workers who pay the taxes that fund welfare were required to pass a drug test in order to get their jobs
Welfare Abusers in 12 States Just Got Some Brutal Bad News
( P.S. --- I'm NOT Liberal, Conservative, Republican, Democrat, nor anything other than an American for America )
Yo, put them up for Adoption? The Mother doesn`t deserve to have kids if she is on drugs!!!
"GTP"
"Obama Hates America"
Sooner or later the truly ignorant were bound to appear...Multigenerational profesional layabouts should be sterilized and put in work camps. They are a bane on society.
If you want to keep your liberal ghetto pets, YOU pay for them!
Sooner or later the truly ignorant were bound to appear...Multigenerational profesional layabouts should be sterilized and put in work camps. They are a bane on society.
If you want to keep your liberal ghetto pets, YOU pay for them!
Please stop for his sake...facts,logic and thinking will result in this for him:So, we deny them benefits, then we take the children away, and then what? We break up families because someone smokes weed? We take children away from parents because the parents smoke weed? Are we going to Colorado and do the same? What do we do with disabled Vets cut from the program? Are we to allow them to go without food after being disabled in combat?Are the ones cutting people out going to be tested also? They get paid with tax dollars. Local, county, and state employees get paid with tax dollars. Shouldn't they also be tested? And, what is the states going to do with those that fail the drug tests? If a mother fails, and has three very small children to feed, what will happen to the children? Are the states going to allow them to starve because their mother failed the drug test? And, what about testing everyone that gets tax dollars? Those that are requiring the tests, get paid via tax dollars. Are we going to be fair across the board, or just single out the poor, the less fortunate, and the disabled? Are we going to deny disabled Vets benefits? Are we going to deny small children food? What happens to those cut from the program?I support this
Lets get it expanded to cover all 50 states
-Geaux
In most states, people collecting welfare can “earn” more money than if they worked full time at a minimum wage job, and these welfare payouts can take up roughly one-quarter to one-third of eachindividual state’s budget.
In order to cut down on these insanely high and growing costs, many states have moved to crack down on waste, fraud and abuse in their welfare programs.
One method many states have chosen to do this, and that 12 more states are now seriously looking at, is through drug testing for welfare recipients, the theory being that if someone has enough money to buy and use drugs, they don’t need or deserve welfare assistance from taxpayers.
Of course liberals will weep and wail and gnash their teeth, calling the drug testing of welfare recipients cruel, unfair and discriminatory, apparently oblivious to the fact that a majority of the workers who pay the taxes that fund welfare were required to pass a drug test in order to get their jobs
Welfare Abusers in 12 States Just Got Some Brutal Bad News
( P.S. --- I'm NOT Liberal, Conservative, Republican, Democrat, nor anything other than an American for America )
Yo, put them up for Adoption? The Mother doesn`t deserve to have kids if she is on drugs!!!
"GTP"
"Obama Hates America"
Are we going to test the social workers, the county and state employees, and everyone else getting tax dollars? Or, do we just single out the poor, less fortunate, and the disabled?
Lets put it to the test and find out
-Geaux
What 7 States Discovered After Spending More Than 1 Million Drug Testing Welfare Recipients ThinkProgress
According to state data gathered by ThinkProgress, the seven states with existing programs — Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah — are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferret out very few drug users. The statistics show that applicants actually test positive at a lower rate than the drug use of the general population. The national drug use rate is 9.4 percent. In these states, however, the rate of positive drug tests to total welfare applicants ranges from 0.002 percent to 8.3 percent, but all except one have a rate below 1 percent. Meanwhile, they’ve collectively spent nearly $1 million on the effort, and millions more may have to be spent in coming years.
Yo, drug testing should pay for itself after catching a few? The money used for Welfare should pay for it in the long run!!! The Radicals don`t like it because it might cost them voters in the long run!!! Because the ones who get caught will have to find a JOB, and eventually their mindset will change, hey, being responsible for yourself is the "RIGHT" thing to do!!!!!!
"GTP"
View attachment 37436
1stRambo
Prove who she is and that she actually does all of that.
Yo, go to any Ghetto, you will learn something!!!
"GTP"
"Obama Hates America"
You posted a phony photo.
Make the welfare recipient pay for it. Why the fuck does everything have to be free?Wouldn't drug testing all welfare recipients cost more? Who is expected to pay for that additional expense?
Illegal drugs are legal in Colorado. A lot of people smoke weed. So, we exclude some and punish others? What about those on pain killers? What about those with health issues that have to take Hydrocodone, and other powerful drugs? What about tests for members of Congress, the president, governors, state legislators, members of law enforcement, and all others receiving tax dollars? Do we just single out the poor, the less fortunate, the disabled, and the elderly? And, what do we do with them once we cut their benefits? What is plan "B" if they fail the tests?We should have drug tested every banker before giving them any TARP money.
You should have to take a piss test to get a deduction, credit, or exemption on your taxes.
Dude, that was a "what's good for the goose" post.Illegal drugs are legal in Colorado. A lot of people smoke weed. So, we exclude some and punish others? What about those on pain killers? What about those with health issues that have to take Hydrocodone, and other powerful drugs? What about tests for members of Congress, the president, governors, state legislators, members of law enforcement, and all others receiving tax dollars? Do we just single out the poor, the less fortunate, the disabled, and the elderly? And, what do we do with them once we cut their benefits? What is plan "B" if they fail the tests?We should have drug tested every banker before giving them any TARP money.
You should have to take a piss test to get a deduction, credit, or exemption on your taxes.