"We were told if we don’t get money from patients, in the ER, we will be fired.”

Greenbeard

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2010
7,352
1,518
200
New England
NYT has an interesting look today at some of the more aggressive medical debt collection tactics.

Debt Collector Is Faulted for Tough Tactics in Hospitals
One of the nation’s largest medical debt-collection companies is under fire in Minnesota for having placed its employees in emergency rooms and other departments at two hospitals and demanding that patients pay before receiving treatment, according to documents released Tuesday by the Minnesota attorney general. The documents say the company also used patient health records to wrangle for more money on overdue bills.

In its pitches to hospitals, Accretive boasts that it trains its staff to focus on getting payment. Employees in the emergency room were told to ask incoming patients first for a credit-card payment. If that fails, employees are told to say, “If you have your checkbook in your car I will be happy to wait for you,” internal documents show.

In July 2010, a manager at Accretive told staff members at Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota hospital group, that they should “get cracking on labor and delivery,” since there is a “good chunk to be collected there,” according to internal company e-mails.

As part of its collection strategy, Accretive fostered a boiler-room environment at the hospitals it works with, according to hospital employees and the newly released documents.

While hospital collections increased, patient care plummeted, the employees said. “Patients are harassed mercilessly,” a hospital employee told Ms. Swanson. Another hospital employee complained, “We were told if we don’t get money from patients, in the emergency room, we will be fired.”

Accretive debt-collection employees, calling themselves “financial counselors,” are instructed by the upper management ranks to stall patients entering the emergency room until they have agreed to pay a prior balance, according to the documents.

Reminiscent of a trend the WSJ noted four years ago:

Why Hospitals Want Your Credit Report - WSJ.com
In a development that consumer groups say raises privacy issues, a growing number of hospitals are mining patients' personal financial information to figure out how likely they are to pay their bills.

Some hospitals are peering into patients' credit reports, which contain information on people's lines of credit, debts and payment histories. Other hospitals are contracting with outside services that predict a patient's income and whether he or she is likely to walk away from a medical bill. Hospitals often use these services when patients are uninsured or have big out-of-pocket costs despite having health insurance.

Hospitals say the practice helps them identify which patients to pursue actively for payment because they can afford to pay. They say it also allows them to figure out more quickly which patients are eligible for charity care or assistance programs.
 
Will this stop illegals from going to ER rooms for an aspirin for their headaches?

Without knowing more, I would bet that these are private hospitals, not charity or county hospitals.
 
I wonder if you can go to a car dealership and expect to get a car without paying for it
 
NYT has an interesting look today at some of the more aggressive medical debt collection tactics.

Debt Collector Is Faulted for Tough Tactics in Hospitals
One of the nation’s largest medical debt-collection companies is under fire in Minnesota for having placed its employees in emergency rooms and other departments at two hospitals and demanding that patients pay before receiving treatment, according to documents released Tuesday by the Minnesota attorney general. The documents say the company also used patient health records to wrangle for more money on overdue bills.
In its pitches to hospitals, Accretive boasts that it trains its staff to focus on getting payment. Employees in the emergency room were told to ask incoming patients first for a credit-card payment. If that fails, employees are told to say, “If you have your checkbook in your car I will be happy to wait for you,” internal documents show.

In July 2010, a manager at Accretive told staff members at Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota hospital group, that they should “get cracking on labor and delivery,” since there is a “good chunk to be collected there,” according to internal company e-mails.

As part of its collection strategy, Accretive fostered a boiler-room environment at the hospitals it works with, according to hospital employees and the newly released documents.

While hospital collections increased, patient care plummeted, the employees said. “Patients are harassed mercilessly,” a hospital employee told Ms. Swanson. Another hospital employee complained, “We were told if we don’t get money from patients, in the emergency room, we will be fired.”

Accretive debt-collection employees, calling themselves “financial counselors,” are instructed by the upper management ranks to stall patients entering the emergency room until they have agreed to pay a prior balance, according to the documents.
Reminiscent of a trend the WSJ noted four years ago:

Why Hospitals Want Your Credit Report - WSJ.com
In a development that consumer groups say raises privacy issues, a growing number of hospitals are mining patients' personal financial information to figure out how likely they are to pay their bills.

Some hospitals are peering into patients' credit reports, which contain information on people's lines of credit, debts and payment histories. Other hospitals are contracting with outside services that predict a patient's income and whether he or she is likely to walk away from a medical bill. Hospitals often use these services when patients are uninsured or have big out-of-pocket costs despite having health insurance.

Hospitals say the practice helps them identify which patients to pursue actively for payment because they can afford to pay. They say it also allows them to figure out more quickly which patients are eligible for charity care or assistance programs.

Why is this in healthcare? Are you actually so stupid you do not understand the difference between debt collectors and doctors?
 
I wonder if you can go to a car dealership and expect to get a car without paying for it
If the car is reasonably priced, then a person doesn't mind paying for it (if have to have one), but when it is priced to gouge someone, and then the car breaks down just about as soon as it leaves the lot, many refuse to pay for that car anylonger.

The same with anything else in life, where as if it is over priced and set far beyond what a person can deal with fairly to begin with, but yet the person is forced to have to get it at that moment in their life, then it's only a matter of time before they will default on the product in which was sold to them in this manor, and the company who sold it knows this, but no fear by the corrupt company who sold the product, because they will just await the person to turn to the government for help or they will submit it themselves, and the bill is then taken care of no matter how outrageous the bill might have been or how bad the product was in which was sold to them in a time of their desperate need (especially when it comes to ones heath in life).

Thank God that the car salesman hasn't figured out how to get the government to pay for the car to, because we as working taxpayers, could no longer afford to live and pay taxes in the nation in which would then be called the United States of Gougeville North America.
 
Last edited:
The same with anything else in life, where as if it is over priced and set far beyond what a person can deal with fairly to begin with, but yet the person is forced to have to get it at that moment in their life, then it's only a matter of time before they will default on the product in which was sold to them in this manor, and the company who sold it knows this, but no fear by the corrupt company who sold the product, because they will just await the person to turn to the government for help or they will submit it themselves, and the bill is then taken care of no matter how outrageous the bill might have been or how bad the product was in which was sold to them in a time of their desperate need (especially when it comes to ones heath in life).

Indeed, when you get to the point where debt collectors are actually stationed in the emergency room, interfering with the work of medical professionals, you've got a serious problem with your system. It's not good for the patients, it's not good for the doctors, and it's not even good for the suits at the hospital.
 
you've got a serious problem with your system.

yes the problem is, no capitalism, just in effect a government monopoly. Remember how they made customers wait in line all day in the USSR. When there is no capitalism you have no incentive to be nice and to be cheap and to be high quality.

A liberal will lack the IQ to grasp these basics
 
The same with anything else in life, where as if it is over priced and set far beyond what a person can deal with fairly to begin with, but yet the person is forced to have to get it at that moment in their life, then it's only a matter of time before they will default on the product in which was sold to them in this manor, and the company who sold it knows this, but no fear by the corrupt company who sold the product, because they will just await the person to turn to the government for help or they will submit it themselves, and the bill is then taken care of no matter how outrageous the bill might have been or how bad the product was in which was sold to them in a time of their desperate need (especially when it comes to ones heath in life).

Indeed, when you get to the point where debt collectors are actually stationed in the emergency room, interfering with the work of medical professionals, you've got a serious problem with your system. It's not good for the patients, it's not good for the doctors, and it's not even good for the suits at the hospital.
No other industrialized country experiences that kind of thing.
No one goes bankrupt because they are unfortunate enough to have a heart attack or cancer.
 
So, now how will the wingnuts spin the free health care for the poor and uninsured?

If you don't die in the ER waiting room, you may die while being badgered/harassed by a debt collector.
 
The same with anything else in life, where as if it is over priced and set far beyond what a person can deal with fairly to begin with, but yet the person is forced to have to get it at that moment in their life, then it's only a matter of time before they will default on the product in which was sold to them in this manor, and the company who sold it knows this, but no fear by the corrupt company who sold the product, because they will just await the person to turn to the government for help or they will submit it themselves, and the bill is then taken care of no matter how outrageous the bill might have been or how bad the product was in which was sold to them in a time of their desperate need (especially when it comes to ones heath in life).

Indeed, when you get to the point where debt collectors are actually stationed in the emergency room, interfering with the work of medical professionals, you've got a serious problem with your system. It's not good for the patients, it's not good for the doctors, and it's not even good for the suits at the hospital.

It's just two hospitals in one state. Calm down.
 
The same with anything else in life, where as if it is over priced and set far beyond what a person can deal with fairly to begin with, but yet the person is forced to have to get it at that moment in their life, then it's only a matter of time before they will default on the product in which was sold to them in this manor, and the company who sold it knows this, but no fear by the corrupt company who sold the product, because they will just await the person to turn to the government for help or they will submit it themselves, and the bill is then taken care of no matter how outrageous the bill might have been or how bad the product was in which was sold to them in a time of their desperate need (especially when it comes to ones heath in life).

Indeed, when you get to the point where debt collectors are actually stationed in the emergency room, interfering with the work of medical professionals, you've got a serious problem with your system. It's not good for the patients, it's not good for the doctors, and it's not even good for the suits at the hospital.
No other industrialized country experiences that kind of thing.
No one goes bankrupt because they are unfortunate enough to have a heart attack or cancer.

No one in this country goes bankrupt for that either.
 
So, now how will the wingnuts spin the free health care for the poor and uninsured?

If you don't die in the ER waiting room, you may die while being badgered/harassed by a debt collector.

It isn't spin it's just fact.

It's two hospitals in one state.

ERs cannot refuse to treat a patient.

If you cannot pay, they cannot take back the stitches, or the CPR, or even the bandages.

No one has a right to healthcare and no one has a right to use the government as a tool of plunder
 
Indeed, when you get to the point where debt collectors are actually stationed in the emergency room, interfering with the work of medical professionals, you've got a serious problem with your system. It's not good for the patients, it's not good for the doctors, and it's not even good for the suits at the hospital.

I think Hell just froze over, as I actually agree with you.

No hospital should allow this to happen. Collection agents should NOT be allowed to badger patients in an ER, or in the ER waiting room, period. Either the hospital should prevent it, or congress (yeah, like that'll happen right?) should.
 
Indeed, when you get to the point where debt collectors are actually stationed in the emergency room, interfering with the work of medical professionals, you've got a serious problem with your system. It's not good for the patients, it's not good for the doctors, and it's not even good for the suits at the hospital.

I think Hell just froze over, as I actually agree with you.

No hospital should allow this to happen. Collection agents should NOT be allowed to badger patients in an ER, or in the ER waiting room, period. Either the hospital should prevent it, or congress (yeah, like that'll happen right?) should.

I don't think we need Congress to get involved. They've butt fucked us enough over the last 40 years as it is with our health care system.
 
ERs cannot refuse to treat a patient.

They most certainly can refuse to treat.

No they can't and you can thank Ronnie for that one.

EMTALA

Yes, they can.

2. What are the provisions of EMTALA?
EMTALA.COM, 23 April 2011 (created 22 April 2011)

  • no tags

The essential provisions of the statute are as follows:

Any patient who "comes to the emergency department" requesting "examination or treatment for a medical condition" must be provided with "an appropriate medical screening examination" to determine if he is suffering from an "emergency medical condition". If he is, then the hospital is obligated to either provide him with treatment until he is stable or to transfer him to another hospital in conformance with the statute's directives.

What constitutes "coming to the emergency department"? See our special note on the 250 yard rule and its discussion of presentations to locations other than the emergency room, as well as the further discussion below.

If the patient does not have an "emergency medical condition", the statute imposes no further obligation on the hospital.

The definition provided under the statute is:
A medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) such that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in —
placing the health of the individual (or, with respect to a pregnant woman, the health of the woman or her unborn child) in serious jeopardy,
serious impairment to bodily functions, or
serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part
, or

With respect to a pregnant woman who is having contractions —
that there is inadequate time to effect a safe transfer to another hospital before delivery, or
that the transfer may pose a threat to the health or safety of the woman or her unborn child."
 
Last edited:
They most certainly can refuse to treat.

No they can't and you can thank Ronnie for that one.

EMTALA

Yes, they can.

2. What are the provisions of EMTALA?
EMTALA.COM, 23 April 2011 (created 22 April 2011)

  • no tags

The essential provisions of the statute are as follows:

Any patient who "comes to the emergency department" requesting "examination or treatment for a medical condition" must be provided with "an appropriate medical screening examination" to determine if he is suffering from an "emergency medical condition". If he is, then the hospital is obligated to either provide him with treatment until he is stable or to transfer him to another hospital in conformance with the statute's directives.

What constitutes "coming to the emergency department"? See our special note on the 250 yard rule and its discussion of presentations to locations other than the emergency room, as well as the further discussion below.

If the patient does not have an "emergency medical condition", the statute imposes no further obligation on the hospital.

Ok, you may be right. They can't deny life saving treatment, however. That's where I was coming from.
 
So, now how will the wingnuts spin the free health care for the poor and uninsured?

If you don't die in the ER waiting room, you may die while being badgered/harassed by a debt collector.


ERs cannot refuse to treat a patient.

They most certainly can refuse to treat.

I'm sitting here trying to figure out the trick. Knowing you, if you've posted something like this there must be some kind of trick, but you got me. I can't figure it out. Emergency rooms, by law, are not allowed to refuse emergency patients.
 
They most certainly can refuse to treat.

No they can't and you can thank Ronnie for that one.

EMTALA

Yes, they can.

2. What are the provisions of EMTALA?
EMTALA.COM, 23 April 2011 (created 22 April 2011)

  • no tags

The essential provisions of the statute are as follows:

Any patient who "comes to the emergency department" requesting "examination or treatment for a medical condition" must be provided with "an appropriate medical screening examination" to determine if he is suffering from an "emergency medical condition". If he is, then the hospital is obligated to either provide him with treatment until he is stable or to transfer him to another hospital in conformance with the statute's directives.

What constitutes "coming to the emergency department"? See our special note on the 250 yard rule and its discussion of presentations to locations other than the emergency room, as well as the further discussion below.

If the patient does not have an "emergency medical condition", the statute imposes no further obligation on the hospital.

The definition provided under the statute is:
A medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity (including severe pain) such that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in —
placing the health of the individual (or, with respect to a pregnant woman, the health of the woman or her unborn child) in serious jeopardy,
serious impairment to bodily functions, or
serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part
, or

With respect to a pregnant woman who is having contractions —
that there is inadequate time to effect a safe transfer to another hospital before delivery, or
that the transfer may pose a threat to the health or safety of the woman or her unborn child."

I see it now. The post I was reponding to, was the one that staed people would die. I'd call that an emergency.
 

Forum List

Back
Top