Watch Newt Gingrich on CNN on election night all night!

[Judicial review]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

 

[Nyvin]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

Omg, you actually listen to him???

 

[Judicial review]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

Omg, you actually listen to him???

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

 

[Nyvin]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

Omg, you actually listen to him???

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

 

[WelfareQueen]

A pompous idiot....sorry.

 

[Judicial review]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

Omg, you actually listen to him???

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

 

[Nyvin]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

Omg, you actually listen to him???

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

 

[Judicial review]

This guys has been through this before while speaker of the house and this will be the best insight you will get. Screw foxnews or msnbc. Wankers.

Omg, you actually listen to him???

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

 

[Nyvin]

Omg, you actually listen to him???

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

 

[Judicial review]

Yes. He is the true leader of the GOP. The most qualified of them all. The 1 of 2 guys that can win in 2016. The former speaker of the House who screwed both Clintons while in congress.

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

You are reaching now.

 

[Nyvin]

His entire campaign in 2012 was funded by Sheldon Adelson, one of the most misinformed big donors out there. Newt couldn't even get much support from the Chamber of Commerce. After his primary went down in flames and he finished fourth (even Ron Paul beat him) he went on to say on Faux News that Romney would win in a landslide and the GOP would take the Senate.

The 95-96 GOP government shutdown was largely seen as a disaster for the GOP and Newt took center stage of it. What do you possibly see in this guy?

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

You are reaching now.

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Why would anybody listen to that flatulating butt head?

 

[Judicial review]

He lost because EVERYONE was out spent 20-30:1. Check your facts. After the standing ovation in SC and the win there had he had money to commit to Florida ahead of time he would have won it and won everything. The shutdown in the mid 90's did wonders for the GOP. It lead to Bush and lead to a full GOP Government control for 8 years. Ideas and leadership to answer your question. The guy has lead from the 2nd highest position in Government and got a ton of major reforms done.

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

You are reaching now.

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

 

[Nyvin]

The shutdown caused Clinton's popularity to surge, get re-elected, and in the 6th year midterms (98) the GOP actually "lost" 5 seats during a Democrat President's term.

The private polls that Gingrich put out about pushing the lewinsky scandal on Clinton would ruin him were all dead wrong and Clinton's popularity surged during the scandal.

Both the shutdown and the lewinsky scandal were almost directly attributed to Gingrich and both results were terrible. He was almost forced to resign from Speaker in 97 but somehow made it out alive just to be forced to resign Speaker the day after the 98 election, and retiring early from the house the next January.

I'm sorry but this guy's history is nothing but a plethora of failures.

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

You are reaching now.

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

ROFL....Dole was Majority leader in the Senate. Wow....really???

 

[Judicial review]

He did lose seats in the house, but he played hardball with a very determined liberal and won with balanced budgets and welfare reform and he got rid of Clinton. What more do you want the speaker of the house to do? How much more can he do? Elect him as president and it's worth finding out. You don't want to argue with me on this I will win every time.

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

You are reaching now.

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

ROFL....Dole was Majority leader in the Senate. Wow....really???

Bills start in the house and if they are changed they end in the house a go for Presidential signature. Newt Gingrich is responsible for the balanced budgets and negotiating with Bill Clinton. Not dole. That's what the speaker of the house does. Also, get's his party on board. There's no arguing with it.

 

[Nyvin]

Calling Clinton a liberal is kind of a joke first of all. Also Newt didn't win...Dole negotiated with Clinton and they passed a budget more on Clinton's terms then Dole's. After that in the face of huge public scrutiny Newt was forced to accept the Dole/Clinton budget. He didn't get rid of Clinton as the Senate never did impeach him. It's kind of ironic Gingrich had to leave the House before Clinton left the Presidency.

Without Sheldon Adelson, Gingrich would be a distant memory right now, maybe a fox news panelist but not much more.

You are reaching now.

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

ROFL....Dole was Majority leader in the Senate. Wow....really???

Bills start in the house and if they are changed they end in the house a go for Presidential signature. Newt Gingrich is responsible for the balanced budgets and negotiating with Bill Clinton. Not dole.

Like how 2013 Harry Reid had nothing to do with negotiating the budget?? Please, you have no clue what you're talking about.

 

[Judicial review]

You are reaching now.

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

ROFL....Dole was Majority leader in the Senate. Wow....really???

Bills start in the house and if they are changed they end in the house a go for Presidential signature. Newt Gingrich is responsible for the balanced budgets and negotiating with Bill Clinton. Not dole.

Like how 2013 Harry Reid had nothing to do with negotiating the budget?? Please, you have no clue what you're talking about.

They play a part, but the real work is done in the House with the speaker of the house. There's a reason why the Speaker is 3rd in line to be President. This argument is futile so give up.

 

[Nyvin]

Reaching with what? That the Senate didn't impeach Clinton? It didn't. That Clinton wasn't a liberal? He wasn't, he was the person who brought the Democrats to the right to be competitive in national elections, unlike Dukakis in 88.

The budget was not a win for Gingrich, it included the tax increases that Newt was against, and it didn't cut the non-defense spending as much as he wanted either. Clinton got the better deal. Dole was willing to work with Clinton more or less from the beginning, and various polls showed the public blaming the Republicans overwhelming more then the Democrats, just like 2013.

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

ROFL....Dole was Majority leader in the Senate. Wow....really???

Bills start in the house and if they are changed they end in the house a go for Presidential signature. Newt Gingrich is responsible for the balanced budgets and negotiating with Bill Clinton. Not dole.

Like how 2013 Harry Reid had nothing to do with negotiating the budget?? Please, you have no clue what you're talking about.

They play a part, but the real work is done in the House with the speaker of the house. There's a reason why the Speaker is 3rd in line to be President. This argument is futile so give up.

The reason why the Speaker is 3rd in line is because the Vice President who is the acting president of the Senate is 2nd in line....

Okay, so you admit they play a part, which is all I ever said from the beginning. Thanks for showing you were arguing about nothing.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Why is the OP ignoring posters other than Nyvin in his thread?

 

[Judicial review]

Gingrich was the speaker of the house during the balanced budget not Dole.

ROFL....Dole was Majority leader in the Senate. Wow....really???

Bills start in the house and if they are changed they end in the house a go for Presidential signature. Newt Gingrich is responsible for the balanced budgets and negotiating with Bill Clinton. Not dole.

Like how 2013 Harry Reid had nothing to do with negotiating the budget?? Please, you have no clue what you're talking about.

They play a part, but the real work is done in the House with the speaker of the house. There's a reason why the Speaker is 3rd in line to be President. This argument is futile so give up.

The reason why the Speaker is 3rd in line is because the Vice President who is the acting president of the Senate is 2nd in line....

Okay, so you admit they play a part, which is all I ever said from the beginning. Thanks for showing you were arguing about nothing.

Where does that leave Dole? Case and point. Gingrich created the 4 balanced budgets and welfare reform and without him it wouldn't have happened.