Watch: Mark Levin breaks down obama's wiretapping of President Trump

[MindWars]

WATCH: MARK LEVIN BREAKS DOWN OBAMA’S WIRETAPPING OF PRESIDENT TRUMP
Obama administration accused of illegally spying on Trump campaign



While the media claims President Trump has “no evidence” for accusing his predecessor of wiretapping, radio host and former constitutional attorney Mark Levin breaks down evidence showing the Obama administration indeed spied on the Trump campaign, backing up his claims with various mainstream media reports.

Who did they spy on and what was the extent of it?


===========================================================

Break it down and they still won't get it the lefties prefer to deny what information is laying right in front of them. oh well that's how they keep the DIMocrats in their hypnotic trances.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

They better not let this go! "Plow ahead without them" (the Demonrats).

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I was just reading about it yesterday. I do not know why they are claiming there is no evidence to prove Obama was wiretapping Trump. Of course there is!

Mark Levin to GOP: Investigate Obama's 'Silent Coup' vs. Trump


1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.

2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.


5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.

6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly or leaked.

7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.

8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Postreports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well.

Mark Levin to GOP: Investigate Obama's 'Silent Coup' vs. Trump

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Mark Levin to GOP: Investigate Obama's 'Silent Coup' vs. Trump

In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media.

Levin called the effort a “silent coup” by the Obama administration and demanded that it be investigated.

_____________
Why does the media ignore the facts of this story? Any ideas?

 

[mamooth]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

Bringing you up to speed here:

Mark Levin to GOP: Investigate Obama's 'Silent Coup' vs. Trump

In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media.

Levin called the effort a “silent coup” by the Obama administration and demanded that it be investigated.

_____________
Why does the media ignore the facts of this story? Any ideas?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

Does Merkle know? Or that reporter?

Obama spox says Obama never wiretapped a US citizen — immediately receives harsh history lesson

 

[mamooth]

Does Merkle know? Or that reporter?

I think everyone who isn't a complete 'tard knows that the President can't order wiretaps.

Why is that concept so tough for you?

No, the Justice Department is not the President. Why do you think it is? Just how many lead paint chips did you eat as children?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

Does Merkle know? Or that reporter?

Obama spox says Obama never wiretapped a US citizen — immediately receives harsh history lesson

Obama spox says Obama never wiretapped a US citizen — immediately receives harsh history lesson
From your link:

Lewis’ comments, however, struck a cord on Twitter — and many were quick to fact check his claim that the Obama administration never targeted a U.S. citizen with surveillance.

In fact, it’s widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013, most famous Fox News’ James Rosen and his family. The wiretaps were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. The Associated Press was also a target of the surveillance.

Here’s how Twitter reacted:

Except James Rosen, his parents the AP. Evan Rosenfeld on Twitter

— Kerry Picket (@KerryPicket) March 4, 2017



Let's not forget in 2013 Obama had Fox News reporter James Rosen's phone tapped, calling him a "co-conspirator" under the Espionage Act. Donald J. Trump on Twitter

— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) March 4, 2017



@tiffeloyx @KLewis44 Its a lie, we know for a fact they were illegally wiretapping journalist… selective memory doesn't make you educated

— Ruby Jean (@jewel531) March 4, 2017



@KLewis44 James Rosen and his mom think they're lying

— SicSemp (@SempSicEternal) March 4, 2017



Remember folks, Obama had phone tap on Fox News reporter, James Rosen. Even spied on his parents.

— Jane Spillane (@jane_spillane) March 4, 2017



You wiretapped 20 AP phones, seized the phone records of James Rosen's parents & said he was a criminal conspirator. Twitter

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 4, 2017



@ValerieJarrett you are LYING. Obama had Holder monitor James Rosen pic.twitter.com/6Idv17oNvL

— BudaVision (@BudaVision32) March 4, 2017



Could @JamesRosenFNC comment on this? Susan Davis on Twitter

— Ben Domenech (@bdomenech) March 4, 2017



Democrats: "Lol Obama would never #wiretap anyone."

James Rosen: pic.twitter.com/zAZcGXEzFB

— ScottInSC (@ScottInSC) March 4, 2017



@Evan_Rosenfeld Well @JamesRosenFNC would probably argue otherwise!

— #ArrestObama TJ (@UK88TL) March 4, 2017



@Evan_Rosenfeld Ha! Tell that to @JamesRosenFNC !
______________
Ut-oh! People with a memory expose Obama for the liar that he is! Good job!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

Bringing you up to speed here:

Mark Levin to GOP: Investigate Obama's 'Silent Coup' vs. Trump

In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media.

Levin called the effort a “silent coup” by the Obama administration and demanded that it be investigated.

_____________
Why does the media ignore the facts of this story? Any ideas?

Ignore? Don't be silly. Its been all over the news.

This accusation is easy to prove.

Its time he demanded proof in order to exonerate him from his usual lies.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

COMEY IMPLICITLY SAYS DRUMPF IS A DEPLORABLE AND DISGUSTING PIECE OF LYING TRASH

WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to publicly reject President Trump’s assertion that President Barack Obama ordered the tapping of Mr. Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. Mr. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement.

Mr. Comey made the request on Saturday after Mr. Trump leveled his allegation on Twitter. Mr. Comey has been working to get the Justice Department to knock down Mr. Trump’s claim because there is no evidence to support it and it insinuates that the F.B.I. broke the law, the officials said.

A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment. Sarah Isgur Flores, the spokeswoman for the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

A statement by the Justice Department or Mr. Comey refuting Mr. Trump’s allegations would be a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president, putting the nation’s top law enforcement officials in the position of questioning the truthfulness of the government’s top leader. The situation underscores the high stakes of what the president and his aides have set out by accusing the former president of a conspiracy to undermine Mr. Trump’s young administration.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/...gNews&contentID=64989981&pgtype=Homepage&_r=1

 

[MindWars]

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

White House Says It Will No Longer Comment On Trump’s Wiretapping Claim


White House Spokeswoman Walks Back Trump Wiretapping Claims

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Looks like Mindwars sn't getting what's obvious to most.

The cheeto in chief lied.
The cheeto in chief always lies.
The cheeto in chief will always lie.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

White House Says It Will No Longer Comment On Trump’s Wiretapping Claim


White House Spokeswoman Walks Back Trump Wiretapping Claims
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry..._58bc1dcee4b0b99894182989?section=us_politics

Well, that didn't take long.

Damn, he is one chicken shit liar.

You should put this in a new thread. Its well worth it!

 

[Markle]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

Yep, petulant, former President Barack Hussein Obama cannot ORDER a FISA request, but as he told us, in no uncertain terms, he has a phone! He knows who to call to make things happen.

If you believe that President Obama knew nothing about what was happening, the old cliche...I have some land....

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

COMEY IMPLICITLY SAYS DRUMPF IS A DEPLORABLE AND DISGUSTING PIECE OF LYING TRASH

WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to publicly reject President Trump’s assertion that President Barack Obama ordered the tapping of Mr. Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. Mr. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement.

Mr. Comey made the request on Saturday after Mr. Trump leveled his allegation on Twitter. Mr. Comey has been working to get the Justice Department to knock down Mr. Trump’s claim because there is no evidence to support it and it insinuates that the F.B.I. broke the law, the officials said.

A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment. Sarah Isgur Flores, the spokeswoman for the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

A statement by the Justice Department or Mr. Comey refuting Mr. Trump’s allegations would be a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president, putting the nation’s top law enforcement officials in the position of questioning the truthfulness of the government’s top leader. The situation underscores the high stakes of what the president and his aides have set out by accusing the former president of a conspiracy to undermine Mr. Trump’s young administration.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/...gNews&contentID=64989981&pgtype=Homepage&_r=1

Of course he would say that about President Trump. Comey's brother worked as an accountant on the Clinton Foundation, right? It's all one big happy family so to speak. Who did they appoint to lead the investigation for the DOJ? Another Clinton friend who just happened to be a lawyer for John Podesta. How can justice prevail when the foxes are in charge of the hen house? THINK.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Crazy people being crazy. Film at 11.

Do you liars really think nobody notices that you have zero evidence Obama ordered anything? Presidents can't order wiretaps, dumbasses. Reality says you're all profoundly stupid people.

Yep, petulant, former President Barack Hussein Obama cannot ORDER a FISA request, but as he told us, in no uncertain terms, he has a phone! He knows who to call to make things happen.

If you believe that President Obama knew nothing about what was happening, the old cliche...I have some land....

Markle try to keep up.

The cheeto in chief has backed down. He lied and now he's turned tail and run.