Watch A Girl Call Out ‘F**king Idiot’ Infowars Reporter Right To His Face

[Camp]

Yeah, that would work with an actual perv that intended to harm her wouldn't it.

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

He actually said "Young Ma'am"
But dont let that get in the way of praising the foul mouth little shit.

No, he didn't say Ma'am. That is what he is now claiming, but he is lying and only a deaf person would believe him. In any case, who has ever heard of that phrase, "Young Ma'am". It's either young man or young lady. Young Ma'am, you people make up more shyt than a dairy cow.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

He actually said "Young Ma'am"
But dont let that get in the way of praising the foul mouth little shit.

No, he didn't say Ma'am. That is what he is now claiming, but he is lying and only a deaf person would believe him. In any case, who has ever heard of that phrase, "Young Ma'am". It's either young man or young lady. Young Ma'am, you people make up more shyt than a dairy cow.

You know the real issue is not what he said but what she said.
That liberals think she's a hero tells me all I need to know about the left.

 

[mamooth]

So, the Trump fans are, true to form, crying like the delicate snowflakes that they are.

Meanwhile, everyone else is laughing at them.

Since this image is what's sending the Trumpflakes into a weepy meltdown, it needs to be shown to them over and over. Trumpflakes need to be dragged out of their SafeSpaces and shocked into reality. They need to understand how normal people reflexively react to them.

 

[Chuz Life]

The young girl reacted properly when being confronted by an adult stranger calling her a young man. She responded in an aggressive manner and quickly walked away. In other words, she showed the intruding adult stranger she was not intimidated, got him off balance, and got away from him quickly.

When did it become OK for strangers to approach little girls and start conversations with them?

Yeah, that would work with an actual perv that intended to harm her wouldn't it.

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

 

[Chuz Life]

So, the Trump fans are, true to form, crying like the delicate snowflakes that they are.

Meanwhile, everyone else is laughing at them.

Since this image is what's sending the Trumpflakes into a weepy meltdown, it needs to be shown to them over and over. Trumpflakes need to be dragged out of their SafeSpaces and shocked into reality. They need to understand how normal people reflexively react to them.

With all the tie die and all... if I worked at info wars, this poster would be my badge of honor. Nothing more motivating than this kind of feedback from leftardz in meltdown at any age. The sad this is is that this one is so young, one can only imagine how much more indoctrinated it will get before it's a really old enough to sign up for it's government handouts and all.

 

[Camp]

Yeah, that would work with an actual perv that intended to harm her wouldn't it.

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

 

[Camp]

You are the one having a meltdown you dope. The liberals are celebrating and cheering that the little girl knew how to stand up for herself and bitch slap that creep and the creeps at INFO Wars.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

That tweener knows jackshit about politics and is being manipulated by her parents.

When I was a kid my parents explained both sides of the issue when I had questions and never told me I should hate one side or the other.
You liberals are sick in the head.

 

[mamooth]

That girl doesn't know to shut up and obey authority.

Therefore, she threatens the insecure Trumpflake "men" a great deal.

 

[mamooth]

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

You seem to be saying you were unable to tell that the girl was a girl.

Have you always had such gender confusion issues?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That girl doesn't know to shut up and obey authority.

Therefore, she threatens the insecure Trumpflake "men" a great deal.

Not hardly.
I feel sorry for her and I'm disgusted by her parents.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

You seem to be saying you were unable to tell that the girl was a girl.

Have you always had such gender confusion issues?

I'd bet the farm he knows which bathroom to use.

 

[jknowgood]

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

But a guy can can walk into a girls locker undress in front of her. That's not a big deal to you, fuck off you have no credibility.

 

[Camp]

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

But a guy can can walk into a girls locker undress in front of her. That's not a big deal to you, fuck off you have no credibility.

No, you fuck off you lying POS. You have no clue as how I would react in that situation or what my beliefs are. You are just a trash talking insult poster without the intellect to participate in discussions without showing your vile and foul inner self.

 

[jknowgood]

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

But a guy can can walk into a girls locker undress in front of her. That's not a big deal to you, fuck off you have no credibility.

So your against transgendered using the bathroom as the sex of their choice.

 

[Camp]

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

But a guy can can walk into a girls locker undress in front of her. That's not a big deal to you, fuck off you have no credibility.

So your against transgendered using the bathroom as the sex of their choice.

As a matter of fact, yes, I am, particularly when it comes to pre-adults.

 

[jknowgood]

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

But a guy can can walk into a girls locker undress in front of her. That's not a big deal to you, fuck off you have no credibility.

So your against transgendered using the bathroom as the sex of their choice.

As a matter of fact, yes, I am, particularly when it comes to pre-adults.

Color me shocked.

 

[Chuz Life]

It worked for her. She got away from him fast. But when did it become OK for a couple of adult men to approach and film young girls and start asking them questions without consent from the parents? Why was it the mans right to make judgments about a child's behavior or how her mother taught her to react to insults and strangers. She was a kid minding her own business and was approached by an adult male under the pretense of reporting so he was filming her also. The fact the idiot called the little girl a young man tipped the girl off that he was not a professional or real reporter. He was some guy pretending to be a reporter. A fake reporter. He is lucky the parents were not around. Most parents I know would not take kindly to guys videoing their young daughters without consent.

Are you for sure that little girl wasn't a boy? Liberal logic.

Great point!

It would be so non pc for that reporter to assume that person was what it appeared to be biologically on the first glance. Given the event, he was wise to not be gender specific.

He was gender specific, you dunce. That is what caused the little girl to respond the way she did. He referred to her as a boy. This is a female kid we are talking about. Do you have a clue as to how sensitive a girl that age is?

Still, the overriding question should be why this adult male thought it was OK and appropriate to video and question a young child without permission or the presence of her parents? Can all adult men now go out with a video camera and stop pre teen girls, video and question them?

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

In your warped and perverted mind it is perfectly OK for you and people like you to attack and demonize an eleven year old kid for the sin of calling a creepy stranger that insulted her a f'in idiot.

Lame desperation to defend a creep that thinks it is OK to impose himself on a child. In the warped mind of the reporter defenders it is perfectly OK to do what this creep did and the little girl is the demon.

It's obvious that 11 year old libtard has thicker skin and more backbone than you or many of the other snowflake libtardz here on USMB have.

 

[Chuz Life]

You are the one having a meltdown you dope. The liberals are celebrating and cheering that the little girl knew how to stand up for herself and bitch slap that creep and the creeps at INFO Wars.

Roflmfao!

And you don't have a fucking clue about the irony in that or how fucking lame, petty and indicative of a leftard in meltdown grasping at straws that is.... Do you.

 

[Chuz Life]

And you know this reporter did NOT engage with the (possibly gay) parents of this pre-op gender confused leftard in training HOW, exactly?

You seem to be saying you were unable to tell that the girl was a girl.

Have you always had such gender confusion issues?

No. Not always.

Been watching too many commercials for "I am Jazz" being pushed by leftards and their agenda I think.