Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by abu afak, Jun 22, 2018.
sounds like some psuedo scientist needs to be thrown out a window to test their theory.....~S~
Much of what you say is based on your imaginary science. You think people of today are better able to explain the past than one who was there. In fact, he explained so people in ancient times would understand as would people of today.
Dividing by zero does not give results that are without logic. For example 2/0 = n. It means n x 0 = 2. Any elementary school pupil who has learned division can tell you this. There is no n multiplied by zero will give you 2. I just used 2 as an example. It could be any number. What it means is only a creator or God can make it work as they can create something from nothing and it adds up to 2. QED.
It is evidence for God or ∞. Instead, atheist science makes up imaginary stuff like infinite multiverses and infinite singularity that defy the laws of physics and you believe them.
"The gods can do magic because I say so", is not an answer to anything.
Haha. "size of a circle line," "you need 'infinity' to solve such a problem. Are you referring to circumference of a circle? I have no idea why you need "infinity." I suspect you are referring to pi, but it's an irrational number.
Like You, Genepiss is stupid, and in the wrong order, even allowing for grotesque time-fudging.
newsflash it wasn't an historical or scientific book, the Babylons already had the 60 minute hour, 24 hour day, figured out solar eclipses..... it was written to say their is only one deity.....GOD
You never say anyhting, isn't it?
Real numbers, complex numbers, quaternions and octillions are the only systems of numbers we are able to use, if we like to stay in control about divisions by zero. Why 4 systems, why 1, 2, 4 or 8 "dimensions", why not 3 or 5 or any other number? Has this to do with the psychology of our species, with the nature of our concrete universe - or has this spiritual and/or philosophical reasons? What part of such a from of knowlegde is "natural" and what kind is "eternal"? Will another species find the same mathmatical structures - or completely different mathematical structures - or not any mathematics (and music) at all?
"Funny" was now only that I used a wrong word. "Octillions" instead of the german word "Oktonionen" - but I'm not able to find in the moment the correct English word for this expression. I guess it's quite simple "Octonions" - for sure it is not "Octilliions" - but that's not very important.
You never write more than one line you dishonest little Shltbag.
Separate names with a comma.