War Pursued By Other Means….

[PoliticalChic]

….and not by diplomacy.
Or….when is immigration not really immigration?




1.When the Ilhan Omar sort of immigrant, those who are neither grateful for their welcome by this nation, nor wish to assimilate our values and history, students of history see an eon long struggle for supremacy over Western Civilization by a 7th century cult.

Possibly the greatest weapon the other side has is patience, and our weakness is to fail to recognize nothing but the contemporary.




2. Back to the start:

"The extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews." Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust.”

Has much changed in 1400 years?

Not if one judges by immigrants such a Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. They represent war pursued by other means.....

“Since Omar took office in January, she has repeatedly made anti-Semitic tropes. She has continually pushed the notion that those who believe in defending Israel have "dual loyalty." And she can't even call the people who carried out the attack on September 11th "terrorists." No. In her eyes, they're just "some people who did something." Oh, and let's not forget her defending Rep. Rashida Tlaib's comments about the Holocaust giving her a "calming feeling."
Dems, You Might Want To Re-Evaluate Having Omar Talk About 'Racist Tropes'




3. But in their hatred of everything American, the Democrats are quick to embrace the enemies of their enemies. After all, both Islam and the Democrats demand submission.



Democrat Party refuses to call their ‘fresh, new faces’ for bias and bigoty….where is NBC News?
“Democrats’ refusal to call out Ilhan Omar’s anti-semitism is just appalling

What’s hard is bringing a resolution to the House floor condemning a representative’s bigotry when you don’t want to and you’re afraid of making people mad, even though what we’re talking about here is Jew-hatred. We’re talking about a member of Congress attacking a small minority group.

Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, said she believed Omar’s remarks “were not intentionally anti-Semitic.”
https://nypost.com/2019/03/06/democ...-ilhan-omars-anti-semitism-is-just-appalling/




Here is the Democrat military wing chanting that wish:







Is it possible that modern Muslims share the same worldview that the 7th century barbarians had?

You betcha’!

And Ilhan Omar is but the tip of the iceberg.

 

[Edgetho]

Nice play on Von Clausewitz

 

[Taz]

Copy&paste queen is at it again.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Is it possible that modern Muslims share the same worldview that the 7th century barbarians had?

You betcha’! And Ilhan Omar is but the tip of the iceberg.




4. "Alleged Would-be ISIS Bomber Could Have Lived American Dream
...Mustafa Mousab Alowemer was arrested for allegedly plotting to bomb a small Christian church in Pittsburgh's North Side.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, his motivation was to support the cause of ISIS. And he was "aware that numerous people in or around the Church could be killed by the explosion."

That's a lousy way to show gratitude.

You see, Alowemer is a refugee from Syria. He entered the United States three years ago and lived with his family in an apartment in a public housing complex.
They lived there because Pittsburghers are generous."
Alleged Would-be ISIS Bomber Could Have Lived American Dream





I’d say that, with he support of the major political party, and the loss of believe in our Founder’s religion, and belief in the country itself, ….

….these fifth columnists of Islam will….eventually…win.

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. We can see the effect of the threats and attacks, in our once-sister nation, Britain….appeasement and cowardice from the elites.



How generous our societies are, welcoming every immigrant culture, encouraging their values and…eccentricities….what could go wrong???



This:

“ Having allowed the country to turn into a global hub of the Islamic jihad without apparently giving it a second thought, the British establishment is still failing even now— despite the wake-up calls of both 9/11 and the London bomb attacks of 2005—to acknowledge what it is actually facing and take the appropriate action. Instead, it is deep into a policy of appeasement of the phenomenon that threatens it, throwing sops to both radical Islamism and the Muslim community in a panic-stricken attempt to curry favor and buy off the chances of any further attacks.

Britain has a long and inglorious history of appeasing terrorism…. this dubious national trait has been cemented even more firmly into the national psyche by the governing doctrine of multiculturalism, which has made it all but impossible even to acknowledge that this is a problem rooted within the religion of a particular minority community.”
Phillips, “Londonistan,” p. 182


Herein we see the effect of the warning in this adage: If You Don’t Stand for Something, You’ll Fall for Anything. And worse: you society, your values, your heritage, will be subsumed under those of a 7th century barbaric cult.
They know what they stand for....and it hasn't changed in 1400 years.

 

[Old Man Grumbles]

She has continually pushed the notion that those who believe in defending Israel have "dual loyalty.

And just what is Omar in defending Palestine? "Dual loyalty"?

 

[PoliticalChic]

She has continually pushed the notion that those who believe in defending Israel have "dual loyalty.

And just what is Omar in defending Palestine? "Dual loyalty"?

Are you saying she is guilty of what she claims about others???


That would be rule #2 for understanding Democrats....

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.”

― Mark Twain

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Do we really wish to invite in immigrants who want no part of assimilation, who bring radical and atavistic views to our shores?


Or, to put it another way, consider the lengths that one must go to to determine the extent of radicalization. According to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” one should ask if the subject of questioning supports the following:


A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays





7. Here is an even shorter test:

“Rep. Ilhan Omar Refuses To Denounce Al-Qaeda, Islamic Terrorism”

Rep. Ilhan Omar Refuses To Denounce Al-Qaeda, Islamic Terrorism



This Democrat, Omar, finds terrorism and terrorist organization simply a laughing matter:

 

[jc456]

She has continually pushed the notion that those who believe in defending Israel have "dual loyalty.

And just what is Omar in defending Palestine? "Dual loyalty"?

anti Semitic? right?

 

[Old Man Grumbles]

Agreed jc456. Her loyalty is over there, She defends people who have little to no rights to the land they occupy. To be clear, yes I support Israel. I'll sit back now and await the left to come in and bash hell out of me.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. If one were Islamist, and had control of the government, how would he advance Islamization?

Obama’s plan:

"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communitiesthroughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart





Of course, the Democrat Party is with that plan…..

“…Hillary Clinton wants to increase number of Syrian refugees by 500 percent”

Gingrich says Clinton wants to increase number of refugees





Whose side are the Democrats on???????

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. Of all the subject poorly addressed in government school, history is probably the best example.

The march of Islam, from its inception, was, with near regularity, a victory for Islam.
Then, they were powerful enough to pursue war in the usual way.



Not only was territory taken from Christendom, but huge numbers of formerly-Christian peoples converted by the scimitar, resulting in armies of formerly-Christian Muslims who continued the trend.

"The military history of Islam and the West covers a thousand years, from the Battle of Yarmuk (636) until 1683. For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain [711] to the second Turkish siege of Vienna [1683], Europe was under constant threat from Islam," Bernard Lewis elaborates: "All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers... North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe.

Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe," as wave after wave of Islamic attacks crashed against the continent."
The Dire Consequences of Rewriting Western-Muslim History




But the King of Poland, John III Sobieski, relieved the siege of Vienna, routed the largest Muslim army ever assembled, and the Pope proclaimed September 12th as a feast day.

“The Holy League formed under Pope Innocent, spearheaded by Sobieski’s Poles and the Austro-German forces, …went on the offensive against the Turks. Two years later, Orthodox Russia joined the Catholic League. Between 1683 and 1697, fifteen major battles were fought between the Turks and the Christians, twelve won by the latter.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279.





Treaties were signed, territories re-claimed by the Christian forces…..but no one who has studied the history of Islam, or its doctrines, would be led to believe the millennia-long war was over.
It is the weakness of the West, day-dreaming through wish-fulfillment, that has lowered it’s guard.
The willingly-blind imagine the unsuccessful siege of Vienna to be “the last great Muslim assault on Europe.” Far from the truth.



“…wherever and whenever Islamic empires waned but Muslims remained…the jihad collapsed back to its more primordial, piratical form.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. “Every Muslim who is well aware of the history of Islam, knows that the holy war against infidels is an integral part of Islam, and those who read history would know.”
Islamic State video calls for jihad after Brussels blasts - Reuters




According to a manual distributed by ISIS, would be jihadi mass murderers in the West are urged “to blend in with the western way of life and to avoid ‘looking like a Muslim’ so as to stay below the radar of the security services…. Readers are urged to wear a Christian cross, splash on the aftershave, cut off beards and even shun prayer meetings and mosques to avoid detection.” Islamic State’s Ancient Jihadi Tactics ‘Shock’ the West




“Following the September attacks in the United States, Abu Basir, one of the leading scholars supporting the ideology of al-Qa`ida, published a book of Islamic rulings on issues of immigration. In his book of rulings, Abu Basir uses the Islamic principle of “the necessities allow the prohibited.” Just as Muslims can drink wine or eat pork in order to save them from starving, so they can immigrate to the Western “infidel countries” to save themselves from the oppression of the governments of their homelands.

But he goes even further: immigration is allowed also “in order to enforce the Muslims and weaken the infidels. One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of Jihad and enforcement of their power over the infidels. Immigration and Jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it. The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the other.” https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/589c/1fc2080075bccaf3e0caa168ffbcfb1df261.pdf



The jihadi next door knows the plan.
It includes immigration.

 

[PoliticalChic]

11. Modern leaders of political Islam recognize that the scimitar will not lead them to the victory they seek.

[President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan from Turkey when he said, ‘Islam is Islam. There are no modifiers [e.g., Islamic extremism]. Democracy is the train we ride to our ultimate objective.[ world domination.] It must be understood that Islam is a political movement masquerading as a religion. The Islamic movement will seize power as soon as it is able.
http://www.aim.org/guest-column/obamas-distorted-strategy/




Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997:

"We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration

How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?
How will you vote?





Immigration….war pursued by other means.

 

[PoliticalChic]

12. “Derek Gilbert of Sky Watch News recently interviewed me [Raymond Ibrahim]. Among other topics, we discussed why “jihad” is better translated as “struggle” and not “holy war” — and why that actually makes it more dangerous;

why in this sense characters like Linda Sarsour are practitioners of jihad; and why, unlike their descendants, premodern Europeans were not duped by such Islamist stratagems.”
Video: Ibrahim on the Many Faces of Jihad throughout History - Raymond Ibrahim