Waking up in Trump America from a Coma....and your Docotor is a liberal

It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today
 
The only Liberal doctors are those teaching in state run and Ivy League medical schools. You know the old saw them that can, do. Them that can't, teach.
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.


Moron, today's "liberal" is not the definition of the Founders as "Classical Liberals." You dope.......the Founders are essentially the same as todays Conservatives......todays "Liberals" are socialists, who hate the founding of this country, you moron.
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.

No, it isn't. It's what the poster Stratford did. When lexicographical boners hit the fan the thing to do is not let them sit there.
To quote Gilda Radner, I clean up, OK?
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.


Moron, today's "liberal" is not the definition of the Founders as "Classical Liberals." You dope.......the Founders are essentially the same as todays Conservatives......todays "Liberals" are socialists, who hate the founding of this country, you moron.

Here's a wag who thinks he can make a point by writing out a Doublethink and hanging the word "Moron" in front of it.

When you sign your name it's supposed to go at the end, K?

So it would go more like this:

"Up is not up; it's down. Signed, Moron".
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
And that's why you look so fucking stupid when you call them liberals.

There is nothing liberal about the Democrats' authoritarian ideologies.
 
It would be funny if it was not sad. Liberals have been killing the country for quite a while....

]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
And that's why you look so fucking stupid when you call them liberals.

There is nothing liberal about the Democrats' authoritarian ideologies.

No.
Right here all the time I use to also correct people for calling leftist liberals. I would also say the leftist are a very small minority in the liberal landscape.
But that isn't true anymore. Look at the Democrat Presidential candidates. They spend their campaigns trying to out-left each other. Mainstream Democrats have willingly allowed leftist to take over the party. So, in essence... it IS accurate.
 
]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
And that's why you look so fucking stupid when you call them liberals.

There is nothing liberal about the Democrats' authoritarian ideologies.

No.
Right here all the time I use to also correct people for calling leftist liberals. I would also say the leftist are a very small minority in the liberal landscape.
But that isn't true anymore. Look at the Democrat Presidential candidates. They spend their campaigns trying to out-left each other. Mainstream Democrats have willingly allowed leftist to take over the party. So, in essence... it IS accurate.

You just got done proving that it is not. You're sitting here purporting to equate "Liberals" and "leftist" as if they're the same thing, IMMEDIATELY after confirming the point that they are not. How the fuck do you do that?

Here's one thing I've truly never figured out:

I would also say the leftist are.....

You would. And you did, twice in this post alone. "... willingly allowed leftist [sic] to...."

The question is, WHY would you say that? Are you actually unable to navigate the distinction between simple singular and plural verbs? Can you count past "one"?
 
]It would be funny if it wasn't sad that you have yet to figure out that Liberals are responsible for having created this country.
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
And that's why you look so fucking stupid when you call them liberals.

There is nothing liberal about the Democrats' authoritarian ideologies.

No.
Right here all the time I use to also correct people for calling leftist liberals. I would also say the leftist are a very small minority in the liberal landscape.
But that isn't true anymore. Look at the Democrat Presidential candidates. They spend their campaigns trying to out-left each other. Mainstream Democrats have willingly allowed leftist to take over the party. So, in essence... it IS accurate.


The leftists took to calling themselves Liberals because of the way the word sounds.....they aren't liberals, they are totalitarians to their core. Actual Liberals are the American Conservatives......who are the ones who are the philosophical descendants of the Founders....
 
Hardly.
A liberal from the late 1700's has pretty much nothing in common with what people call liberals today

Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
And that's why you look so fucking stupid when you call them liberals.

There is nothing liberal about the Democrats' authoritarian ideologies.

No.
Right here all the time I use to also correct people for calling leftist liberals. I would also say the leftist are a very small minority in the liberal landscape.
But that isn't true anymore. Look at the Democrat Presidential candidates. They spend their campaigns trying to out-left each other. Mainstream Democrats have willingly allowed leftist to take over the party. So, in essence... it IS accurate.

You just got done proving that it is not. You're sitting here purporting to equate "Liberals" and "leftist" as if they're the same thing, IMMEDIATELY after confirming the point that they are not. How the fuck do you do that?

Here's one thing I've truly never figured out:

I would also say the leftist are.....

You would. And you did, twice in this post alone. "... willingly allowed leftist [sic] to...."

The question is, WHY would you say that? Are you actually unable to navigate the distinction between simple singular and plural verbs? Can you count past "one"?
Touch a nerve did I?
I did none of what you say.
I said, not long ago I also use to "correct" people by equating leftist and liberals as one.
I use to say, that liberals and conservatives have the same goals, just differences in opinions on how to get there. That BOTH want a successful America, love their country and believe that it is a great country.
I can't say that anymore. Why would any America loving liberal allow binary thinking control freak leftist take over their party.... WILLINGLY?
Leftist now OWN the Democrat party. One of the few, and this is not easy to say, but few clear thinking Democrats - Pelosi... you think she really wants to impeach Trump?? You think she likes what is happening to the Democrat party? But what did she do? She gave in because otherwise she is done. Toast. Gone.
Biden... another example, in the first debates he was challenging the insanity..almost scoffing it off. Now? He embraces it.
The Democrat Party, and binary control freaks are now one.
 
Wags who misuse terms they don't understand are not my concern. That's on them.
Well...that's kinda what you did no?
There are unfortunately few conservatives left, but I can't think of a single liberal that is actually a liberal.
Liberals of old were more conservative than today's conservatives.
And that's why you look so fucking stupid when you call them liberals.

There is nothing liberal about the Democrats' authoritarian ideologies.

No.
Right here all the time I use to also correct people for calling leftist liberals. I would also say the leftist are a very small minority in the liberal landscape.
But that isn't true anymore. Look at the Democrat Presidential candidates. They spend their campaigns trying to out-left each other. Mainstream Democrats have willingly allowed leftist to take over the party. So, in essence... it IS accurate.

You just got done proving that it is not. You're sitting here purporting to equate "Liberals" and "leftist" as if they're the same thing, IMMEDIATELY after confirming the point that they are not. How the fuck do you do that?

Here's one thing I've truly never figured out:

I would also say the leftist are.....

You would. And you did, twice in this post alone. "... willingly allowed leftist [sic] to...."

The question is, WHY would you say that? Are you actually unable to navigate the distinction between simple singular and plural verbs? Can you count past "one"?
Touch a nerve did I?
I did none of what you say.
I said, not long ago I also use to "correct" people by equating leftist and liberals as one.
I use to say, that liberals and conservatives have the same goals, just differences in opinions on how to get there. That BOTH want a successful America, love their country and believe that it is a great country.
I can't say that anymore. Why would any America loving liberal allow binary thinking control freak leftist take over their party.... WILLINGLY?
Leftist now OWN the Democrat party. One of the few, and this is not easy to say, but few clear thinking Democrats - Pelosi... you think she really wants to impeach Trump?? You think she likes what is happening to the Democrat party? But what did she do? She gave in because otherwise she is done. Toast. Gone.
Biden... another example, in the first debates he was challenging the insanity..almost scoffing it off. Now? He embraces it.
The Democrat Party, and binary control freaks are now one.


UNBELIEVABLE. You did it AGAIN even after it was pointed out TWICE. You really don't know the difference between singular and plural do you. What is your native language? I mean even that dolt Captain Kirk 1967 can figure out number agreement between subject and verb, and he's a self-admitted moron.

You also did the same Doublethink thing trying to equate "Liberal" with "leftist" DIRECTLY after admitting they can't be equated. Maybe English is just not your thing. And now you try to inject a political party, whose name you can't even figure out, into the fray equating three different things.
 
See definitions of words dont change they're set in stone...Until you need to change the definition or attach a different meaning to suit your agenda
See :spinner: weeeeeee
Theyre the lefts rules for retards
 
You're now a classical liberal if you're for hate speech laws ,health care for criminal invaders, and the eradication of the 2nd amendment !

Thats very center ...normal ,,,and very american
derp

god damn right wing reactionaries !
 

Forum List

Back
Top