Vindman translated


Trump Administration Will Remove Anti-Trump Deep State Operative Alex Vindman from NSC Following His Role in Sham Impeachment

Vindman was behind the leaks ‘outside his chain of command.’

During his trip to Ukraine Vindman told Ukrainians to ignore President Trump — Vindman actually thinks he is superior to Trump even though he is an inferior official in the intel department.

Vindman, during his closed-door testimony also flatly denied he knew the identity of the whistleblower (Eric Ciaramella); however, it is believed he was the primary source for Eric Ciaramella.

Vindman’s boss Tim Morrison testified that Vindman was untrustworthy, was a leaker who thought he was in charge.

On Thursday night news broke that Vindman will be removed from the National Security Council!
Yes! Now it's Trumps turn to go on the offensive.

He may have to drag along the (R) "leadership" kicking and screaming though.

Investigate, they will, but that is clearly not enough. The coup plotters must be indicted, tried, and CONVICTED!.....JAIL TIME!
The GOP leadership has no energy on this. Remembering Schumer's warning about what happens to those that take on the Deep State, I think they have them all buffaloed.

These guys will blatantly misuse their snooping authority, and maybe them have let them all know, that they know all about their secrets, and if they want them to remain secrets, you don't mess with them.

This didn't work on Trump because he is fearless and is pretty open about his moral failings, so they were unable to intimidate him.


It "didn't work" because there is no rule of law in America, there is the entitled aristocracy and then there is everyone else. Nothing is trustworthy in America, everything is for sale and renegotiation, wherein "the law" is merely the starting point, the puck drop, the jump ball.

America has not had a legal legit constitutional war since WWII, the entire world knows we are lawless and the quintessential rogue nation when it comes to war and violence across the globe.

The entire world also knows we support 73% of the world's dictatorships via the above.

The entire world watched as Jeffrey Epstein was conveniently disappeared, and Ghislaine Maxwell was allowed to slither back off into the shadows so as not to embarrass our aristocracy with its patronage of child sex trafficking for decades. There's your/our law; it won't even protect children from aristocratic pedophile predators. And the people did nothing but watch.

The entire world saw us bail out American style capitalism with socialism, yet again in 2007-08.

The entire world knows "one hominid one vote" has never been true in America and has always been cockblocked by concentrated capital.

Only americans cannot see for "believing" in shit.
We have Administrative Agencies completely out of control because of the Chevron Decision and another that built on it. Chevron doctrine has greatly empowered administrative agencies to recast the law in accord with current policy preferences, without having to go to Congress for legislative change.

The reasoning of the Chevron decision was not based on statute, and not genuinely on precedent. The relevant language of the Administrative Procedure Act, which the Supreme Court did not even bother to quote, seems quite opposite to the decision. The Act provides that “a reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law” and shall “interpret constitutional and statutory provisions.” In other words, Congress invested the courts, not the regulatory agencies, with the power to interpret the law.

The Chevron Court emphasized agency expertise. To the extent that statutory interpretation is shaped by how best to effectuate statutory purposes, the Court reasoned that expert agencies are better than generalist courts in making these decisions. “Judge are not experts in the field,” the opinion pointed out. The Chevron doctrine was justified on technocratic grounds.

40 years on, the idea that most decisions by regulatory agencies are based on non-political expert judgment now appears quaint and naive. The most important regulatory choices are political or ideological in the most fundamental sense, nothing more than unelected Administrative Appointees prioritizing fads of economics or social "justice". When the agency adopts one reading of its statute under the Bush Administration and another reading under Obama and yet another under Trump, it is hard to attribute the change to dispassionate, neutral expertise. Laws were never intended to be made by the Executive Branch, they are rightly made in the Executive Branch, a difficult process, that ensures that Americans aren't dealing with an ongoing blizzard of rapidly changing laws. And with the Agency Deference enshrined in Chevron, the Courts have not been able to effectively curb the out of control Administrative State.

Both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are ready to reel them in. Read Gorsuch's book "A Republic If You Can Keep It!"
 

Forum List

Back
Top