Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
I've already stated my retort to your position, you say a god is self-evident because the universe exists to which I say no god is required. Reread the thread if you need further expansion of my obviously futile effort to show the holes in your logic, you can also hold the silly ridicule if you wish me to respond further.So how do you convince someone to take your interpretation on faith? Your logic is flawed, ridicule does not make it less flawed...
Neither does your assertion make my position flawed. (See how that works?)
If you'd care to state your claim in specific terms, I'll happily consider what ya have to say. But given your demonstrated intellectual means, there is virtually no chance that you will be able to provide anything even remotely valid, let alone something intellectually sound.
God is Nature... That you claim such does not exist, is as irrelevant to this discussion as it is to nature.
Who says that God is nature?
Your arguments begin with an foundational assumption that you simply can't factually support.
Last edited: