occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,202
- 1,590
Look here doofus, I am not going to argue this topic with someone who cannot argue their side without preaching and seeing my arguments as an attack on their faith, you started out OK but then went off the rails about the time you realized that hard logic does not support your position. I've already said that I do not attack a person's personal faith but I will jump all over faith masquerading as logic. You have faith that there is a god, that's wonderful, why do you need scientific proof? I have a pretty high bar for proof of God's existence and this trash you have presented does not meet the standard of scientific proof. Be happy in your faith and accept that you are not going win any converts with this.Oh well, if you reject my rebuttal out-of-hand instead of sticking to logical debate then I guess we are done here, enjoy your thread.Second even if we assume that such is true, that the universe has a beginning does not have any bearing on whether that beginning has a cause.
A beginning, actually does, in fact, require causation.
Nothing, in fact, suggests your gawds of anyone else's gawds were a causation for anything.
Nothing, IN FACT, suggests that your recognition or rejection of God, is in any way relevant to even this very discussion, let alone God's existence.
Your rebuttal amounts, in effect, to: "Nuh Huh". It's logically invalid and intellectually unsound.